Back to @ElijahKyama_'s profile

Kyama ⚽ engagement report

@ElijahKyama_ - 168K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.104%
of 168K followers
Per impression
1.00%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
10.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
175
interactions (median)
Saved
0.04%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 175 interactions against 168K followers, an engagement rate of 0.104%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 113x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mufc, #latenightfinds, #trinitypodcast.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026. Recurring tags: #mufc, #latenightfinds, #trinitypodcast.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kyama ⚽'s engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.104%, Kyama ⚽ sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,233 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,048 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video76% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 76% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 224 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 14, 2025113x their median

    Jose Mourinho explaining to Gary Neville the difference between tactical system & principles of play. "All the good teams they defend compact. It’s just a basic principle.” Pundits blaming Amorim's system for bad defending are clueless. Football basics! https://t.co/Y1hEsnkK75

    18K1.8K147992.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202693x their median

    How does Brighton keep losing their best players and still come back looking even stronger every season?

    15K94418242225K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202656x their median

    The only manager who could have achieved the so called process and complete rebuild is Ruben Amorim and the main reason he failed is because of Bruno Fernandes.

    8.9K52226781224K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202644x their median

    Fabian Hürzeler is going to be the new Premier League manager in demand next summer if he keeps this up.

    7.3K2348624126K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202615x their median

    Funny Carrick is somehow under pressure yet Amorim was allowed to lose games for literally months and not once did I see anything to suggest he was under pressure

    2.2K3051416194K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20264.9x their median

    Gary Neville in Jan 2026 : "There cannot be any consideration Carrick takes the job beyond this season.. Pochettino, Tuchel & Ancelotti." Roy Keane: "Enrique?" GN: "I ruled out Enrique" RK: " Bizarre. We're talking options, you're ruling people out!" https://t.co/Mq0n28o8js

    767601414131K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20263.4x their median

    Micah Richards blasting Amorim when Man Utd lost at Brentford. "All he had to do is go into a 433." Xabi Alonso adapts but Chelsea still lost.. You see why the system talk every matchday was an overreaction? https://t.co/vVXOxufXwp

    533516262K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.3x their median

    tenHag is that manager United should have stuck with till date! what a horrible mistake sacking him. SMH

    38351964978K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.3x their median

    United spent big on Šeško, but what’s the point of signing a striker if the team won’t play to his strengths? 😭   #TrinityPodcast https://t.co/Tzb06Ga6Om

    46759361316K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20262.7x their median

    📊 Pressure and counter-pressure regains | 30 December 2025 (Amorim was sacked a match later) When United lost the ball, they were the best in the Premier League at instantly winning it back. They also won the ball back from pressing more often than almost anyone else. Via @DataAnalyticEPL 👏

    35892151555K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#mufc#latenightfinds#trinitypodcast

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 175 interactions against 168K followers, an engagement rate of 0.104%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 113x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mufc, #latenightfinds, #trinitypodcast.

What is Kyama ⚽'s engagement rate on X?
Kyama ⚽ (@ElijahKyama_) has an engagement rate of 0.104%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 168,207 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.104%, Kyama ⚽ sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ElijahKyama_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ElijahKyama_ post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going