Back to @ELLIPAL's profile

ELLIPAL engagement report

@ELLIPAL - 153K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.011%
of 153K followers
Per impression
0.535%
3.2K views on a typical post
Reach
2.08%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
17
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 17 interactions against 153K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.2K times each, and 0.535% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 106x its own typical post.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026. Recurring tag: #bitcoin.

Compared with accounts its own size

ELLIPAL's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, ELLIPAL sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,102 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,052 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video36% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 36% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 207 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 22, 2026106x their median

    ELLIPAL App 5.0 is coming. Before that, a question for wallet users. Tell us one thing your wallet app should do better, or the one feature you would not give up. Any wallet, including ours. 250 USDT for five answers. 5 winners, 50 USDT each

    6384846681316K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202655x their median

    Traditional millionaires have lawyers, trusts, and insurance. Crypto millionaires have a cold wallet hidden in a sock drawer. One group treats wealth like a business, the other treats it like a lottery ticket. If your security depends entirely on not losing a piece of paper

    8324256464K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202612x their median

    🎁 CONCOURS 🎁 Avec @Neowalt_supply, on vous fait gagner 6 lots pour plus de 500 € de cadeaux : • 5 hardware wallets offerts par Neowalt • 1 carte cadeau de 30 $ en Bitcoin que j’ajoute de mon côté Pour participer : 1. Suivre @maurganecrypto et @Neowalt_supply 2. Liker ce post 3. Le reposter 4. Taguer 1 personne en commentaire Tirage au sort le lundi 28/09 🇫🇷🇧🇪 Concours ouvert à la France et à la Belgique Bonne chance à tous 🤩

    70656214.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20262.8x their median

    gm to everyone who checked the market before checking the weather.☕️

    3131303.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.5x their median

    Here’s your first look at ELLIPAL App 5.0. A refreshed experience that brings the actions you use most into clearer focus. Coming soon.

    314713.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20262.5x their median

    Importing an existing recovery phrase into a hardware wallet restores the same keys. It does not create new ones. If that phrase was previously entered into an online wallet, moving it to new hardware does not change that history. A new phrase creates a new wallet. Your funds move only when you send them to it.

    344403.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20262.1x their median

    gm to everyone who holds their own keys.☕️

    2601003.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20261.5x their median

    BTC chose green today. ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 keeps signing offline. https://t.co/DqhYEpMbsW

    241102.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20261.5x their median

    How many wallets do you actually use? Not what's in them. Just the number.

    1311114.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20261.5x their median

    gm☕️ to everyone who checks the address twice, then refreshes the block explorer ten times after sending.

    210503.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bitcoin

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 17 interactions against 153K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.2K times each, and 0.535% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 106x its own typical post.

What is ELLIPAL's engagement rate on X?
ELLIPAL (@ELLIPAL) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 152,847 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, ELLIPAL sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ELLIPAL have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ELLIPAL post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going