Back to @Disrupttor's profile

The Disruptor engagement report

@Disrupttor - 212K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.009%
of 212K followers
Per impression
0.343%
5.3K views on a typical post
Reach
2.48%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
18
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.7/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 212K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 0.343% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 9% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.6K interactions, about 534x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

The Disruptor's engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 20% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, The Disruptor sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,233 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,048 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video9% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 9% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 77 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 3, 2026534x their median

    There are people who don't mingle with their neighbors. They just say “Hello” and mind their own business.

    8.0K629651293438K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202611x their median

    I’ve started using my weightloss coffee to eat bread. I’m tired Abeg 😪

    965049106.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20269.8x their median

    If I showed you easy way to make 300-1.5m by just sharing posts on your social media status/pages, would you be interested?

    981660214K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20261.9x their median

    I really need a win. Not for attention, but because I genuinely need things to change.

    227505.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20261.6x their median

    GIRLS ONLY!!! To help men be better at sex. What’s one piece of advice you wish every man knew?

    244105.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20261.5x their median

    A certain former big club has been unsuccessfully attempting to do this for the past 3 years… 👀👀 https://t.co/yOWzySJRUa

    164616.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    There are relationships I allowed to d!e natural deaths. I noticed I was the only one holding on and nahhh I’m not built for parasitic people.

    157125.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026

    Find a way to win!

    174315.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    Fresh start.

    154506.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    Happy Sunday! Ready for the new week! https://t.co/eZAJgrAmPz

    123905.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 212K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 0.343% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 9% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.6K interactions, about 534x its own typical post.

What is The Disruptor's engagement rate on X?
The Disruptor (@Disrupttor) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 212,337 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, The Disruptor sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Disrupttor have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Disrupttor post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going