Back to @DerronEShort's profile

Derron E. Short engagement report

@DerronEShort - 349K followers on X

Measured over 95 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.034%
of 349K followers
Per impression
2.55%
4.7K views on a typical post
Reach
1.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
120
interactions (median)
Saved
0.213%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.23/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 349K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 95 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 15,823 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 2.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 358x its own typical post.

Measured over 95 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Derron E. Short's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,823 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 72% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.034%, Derron E. Short sits above the 25th percentile of the 160,210 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.606%
p902.33%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 160,210 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,800 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.606%
90th percentile2.33%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video1% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 1% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 398 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 2, 2025358x their median

    Not everyone is miserably married. Some men actually adore their wives and see her as his best friend. And some women actually love, respect, and cherish their husbands too. Healthy love still exists. May this kind locate you.

    36K6.2K428342870K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202613x their median

    The family you marry into matters. Test whether they’ll hold the person you’re marrying accountable when they’re wrong or support them. You don’t want to marry into a family of liars, cheaters, abusers, and enablers.

    1.2K351233323K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202612x their median

    God wants you to let go of the bitterness, anger, and resentment toward your Judas. He wants to heal your heart and give you back more than you lost. He’s preparing a table for you in the presence of your Judas, and at that table, truth will be served.

    1.2K211151219K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202612x their median

    Marry someone who views marriage as a covenant, not a temporary agreement. This person fears God, so it’s the covenant over temptation, the covenant over difficult seasons, the covenant over conflict, and the covenant over anything life throws at them.

    1.1K288181520K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202612x their median

    Just like God has daughters, He also has sons out here. Not all men cheat, play emotional games, and are abusive. That’s unproductive. No man is perfect, but there are men who sincerely want to please God, love one woman, and fulfill his life’s purpose.

    1.2K249271718K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202610x their median

    It takes a special kind of wickedness to sleep with other women, then come home to the house your loyal, unsuspecting wife has made a home and lie that you love her. That must be that new kind of love, it comes with betrayal, distrust, and heartbreak.

    1.0K21137621K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20267.6x their median

    I might get stoned for saying this, but Christian marriages started failing when leaders stopped teaching men to be righteous and women to be virtuous. Now it’s “What do you bring to the table?” instead of “How can we please God and build together?”

    72515623912K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20266.0x their median

    A person who doesn’t have sexual discipline BEFORE the ring won’t have sexual discipline BECAUSE of the ring.

    552125251413K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20265.9x their median

    Marry someone with long-suffering. This does not mean marrying someone who will tolerate disrespect, abuse, or betrayal. It means marrying someone who has the patience, grace, and wisdom to endure what life throws at the two of you. You are a team.

    5851134711K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20264.5x their median

    Don’t let Judas’s betrayal turn you into a bitter person. What they did to you may have changed your perspective, but don’t let it change your heart. Forgive, heal, grow, and keep moving.

    4259013108.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 349K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 95 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 15,823 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 2.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 358x its own typical post.

What is Derron E. Short's engagement rate on X?
Derron E. Short (@DerronEShort) has an engagement rate of 0.034%, based on the median interactions across 95 original posts from the last 30 days against 348,824 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.034%, Derron E. Short sits above the 25th percentile of the 160,210 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DerronEShort have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,823 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DerronEShort post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going