Back to @DJSCHEME_'s profile

SCHEME engagement report

@DJSCHEME_ - 301K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.065%
of 301K followers
Per impression
1.49%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
4.33%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
194
interactions (median)
Saved
0.038%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 301K followers, an engagement rate of 0.065%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.33% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 34% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 249K interactions, about 1282x its own typical post.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

SCHEME's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 56% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.065%, SCHEME sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,890 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.605%
p902.32%
p9983.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,890 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,041 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.605%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video34% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 34% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 85 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 12, 20231282x their median

    A 23 year old sculpted this. What's your excuse? https://t.co/yc24hOiGtq

    153K13K13K69K660M viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 2026105x their median

    Logan Paul reveals Oliver Tree's label copyright claimed his podcast two days after Oliver passed away “When Oliver was on my podcast, I asked him if I could use his song. He said, ‘Yeah.’ I asked, ‘Is your label going to claim the song? You would need to whitelist the channel.’ He said, ‘Yeah, we'll whitelist the channel’” “Four years passed. Within two days, I'm not kidding. Within two days of him passing, his label claimed that podcast” “Within 48 hours the first thing that came to your mind is to go back and retroactively claim the podcast?!”

    20K192116146.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202648x their median

    NEON realizes Nitro_Camden is forcing his personality and trying way too hard to be like IShowSpeed 😐 https://t.co/UcYihGYtzf

    9.0K79207291.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 202621x their median

    Finally getting the Outsiders. Beautiful

    3.8K2306011132K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202617x their median

    Crazy shit I wake up to.. people made insane money off records he made and I sat here patiently.. never accepted a single offer and just had to watch my music w one of my best friends be leaked year after year. man

    3.1K102589146K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202616x their median

    na this prettifun intro is crazy https://t.co/ReqxbxYToU

    2.8K2441711200K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202613x their median

    999 To Get In.

    2.3K19163430K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202610.0x their median

    Look you can fake streams, hype, and relevancy in music right now but you CAN’T fake selling out arenas across the country year after year! Salute to my brothers @SUICIDEBOYS for paving the way for real independent artists with an amazing message. 🖤🔥 https://t.co/Ey4vi1C3zt

    1.8K16712338K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20269.1x their median

    Damn dawg… RIP Boobie 🕊️ Florida forever

    1.6K853215108K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20268.0x their median

    My stream vod got deleted bc of copy rite claims from by myself and Who’s the other guy 🤣🤣🤣 wtf How is this possible @Twitch https://t.co/qV7tm6FSE5

    1.5K17181108K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 301K followers, an engagement rate of 0.065%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.33% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 34% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 249K interactions, about 1282x its own typical post.

What is SCHEME's engagement rate on X?
SCHEME (@DJSCHEME_) has an engagement rate of 0.065%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 300,510 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.065%, SCHEME sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,890 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DJSCHEME_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DJSCHEME_ post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going