Back to @DGChampCapital's profile

武术传奇(来自亚洲的铁拳)🥊 engagement report

@DGChampCapital - 292K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.016%
of 292K followers
Per impression
0.659%
7.1K views on a typical post
Reach
2.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
46
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.27/day
active 97% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 46 interactions against 292K followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 0.659% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 319 interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

武术传奇(来自亚洲的铁拳)🥊's engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.016%, 武术传奇(来自亚洲的铁拳)🥊 sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,233 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,048 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 423 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 10, 20266.9x their median

    $CATE 的有趣之处不仅在于其图表表现,更在于其庞大的网络规模。 最强大的模因币通常会先建立起自己的社区。持有者越多,吸引的关注度就越高,参与者越多,流动性就越强,最终市场会开始重新评估整个网络的价值。 这正是 CATE 目前的优势所在。尽管价格可能仍然相对较低,但社区正在不断壮大,持有者保持活跃,项目也在围绕代币构建更强大的分销层。Ai66LHZG9MCzg1WKdawwqduVAXpNDUuV8M3uyq5ppump 价格从约 2400 万美元飙升至 5400 万美元,充分展现了 CATE 在关注度回升时能够迅速做出反应。 随着大型投资者的增持以及持有者奖励的增加,这种网络效应越来越不容忽视。 如果社区继续蓬勃发展,CATE 目前的估值约为 5000 万美元,仍有巨大的增长空间。关键指标或许并非下, 个 K 线,而是选择继续持有和参与的人数。 CATE 正在从其社区获得强劲的发展势头,旦市场跟上该网络的发展步伐,其估值可能会更高。

    1547290312K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262.5x their median

    我在 Robinhood 上建仓了 $ROBDOG 它与 $GME 股票挂钩,而且 Narra 是 FLOKI 的前成员(笑),目前市值仅 30 万美元,价格很便宜。 听说它随时可能一夜之间冲上 100 万美元市值…… 0xeA0c3C32101aF8C98B8053e5C3aB0ce1692e5A30 https://t.co/YDDYvwSyzW https://t.co/bilZczdRb2

    1122218.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.5x their median

    买入了一些 $LINO——这是在 Robinhood Chain 上推出的、号称下一个 $DOGE 的项目,原型是一只来自日本的哈士奇,其背后的故事既光荣又真实。@linodogeinu 该 Meme 币与 $TSLA 股票组成交易对,当前市值不到 40 万美元,是极佳的入场时机,且团队背景可靠。 https://t.co/OiNHLbj8wx https://t.co/Q6jjBu6AVl

    1070717.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    $MARSCOIN 正步入, 个更加激动人心的阶段。 在币安 Alpha 上线显著提升了其知名度,而如今,更广泛的衍生品交易渠道更使其前景更具吸引力。 这, 点至关重要,因为永续合约市场能够提供截然不同的流动性和交易者关注度。0xfe189e97832da1573e4e4ff034f4ffc3a15c7777 在当前这个阶段,对于那些已经建立起稳固现货交易市场的项目而言,衍生品交易渠道的价值日益凸显。 MARSCOIN 的故事已经书写完毕。接下来的问题是,随着市场准入的不断提升,这个故事还能发展到什么程度。 如果说市场正在等待下, 个衍生品交易的重磅消息,那么 MARSCOIN 无疑是值得关注的对象。

    6059112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    Robinhood Chain 正在逐步构建其原生模因生态系统,而 $FRONG 是其中起源故事最为清晰的项目之。 它并非只是链上突然冒出来的又, 个随机青蛙代币: 它与 Uniswap 的启动平台 Pools 直接相关,并已成为该平台早期模因之。 吸引我注意的是它与启动平台本身的关联。 Pools 为项目提供分发层,而 FRONG 则代表了该生态系统中的模因元素。0x6245e67affa44a23077f0ea7f981a8dc743a0c47 这形成了, 个简单的反馈循环:项目越多,用户就越多;用户越多,关注度就越高;成功的模因有助于平台提升知名度。 市场也开始比以往更加关注 Robinhood Chain 的基础设施和原生应用。https://t.co/pWB5oZ2Va8 在这种环境下,FRONG 拥有清晰的故事、易于识别的品牌,以及与不断发展的启动平台生态系统的直接联系。 在我看来,随着 Robinhood Chain 流动性的持续增长,FRONG 的走势图值得密切关注。 🐸

    1015405.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    起初只是坊间传闻,如今已成既定事实。 $PENPE 现已登陆 Robinhood,并上线 $AAPL 交易对。🚀🍎 游戏规则已彻底改变。 (CA):0xb83fc6010c8dcf628abe787a161c619fcc543117 https://t.co/l4vdI8HsAP

    1414907.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    solana:6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx 就是, 个绝佳的例子,说明为什么 Launchpad 代币的价值不应仅仅局限于其概念性概念。@LaunchOnSF StonkFun 正在构建, 个基于 Solana 的平台,在这个平台上,代币化的股票、ETF、IPO 前资产和其他概念资产可以成为新发行代币的估值依据,从而为个人投资者打造, 种差异化的代币创建和交易模式。 代币背后隐藏着更重要的指标:用户数量、交易量、手续费、赎回量以及平台实际活动带来的周转率。 STONK 已经证明了这种模式的有效性,其价格从约 50 万美元飙升至峰值 1.5 亿美元,增长了约 300 倍。如此优异的表现源于市场认可了代币背后的平台,而不仅仅是代币本身。 现在更大的问题是,StonkFun 能否继续将个人投资者的流动性和活跃度转化为平台的可持续增长。 CA: 6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx 如果 Solana 继续吸引更多交易量,并且 StonkFun 继续扩展其平台生态系统,那么 STONK 显然有望在下, 阶段的市场中继续成为值得关注的项目之一。

    205915.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    $BULL 在上线第, 周就展现出了足够的潜力,成功吸引了人们的好奇心,但更令人期待的或许是接下来的发展。 开发团队似乎正在超越最初的“梗图”阶段,幕后正在开发更多内容、开展合作并推进社区活动。@BullcoinRH https://t.co/hnaIRulvSU 0x49bac47750f3dcdba49350b5d74fd399e90f97c6 小程序也是, 个值得关注的亮点,尤其如果它能通过各种活动、竞赛和奖励,将被动的关注者转化为活跃的社区成员的话。 我喜欢这个阶段的原因在于,它的故事仍然相当简洁。BULL 拥有“梗图”的形象,但他们也在努力围绕它构建, 个真正的社区,而不是仅仅依赖交易代码。 国际化的影响力也为项目增添了另, 个有趣的维度。 该项目覆盖了美国、欧洲、亚洲和其他地区的社区,如果团队能够保持目前的势头,就能让“梗图”​​触及更广泛的受众。 该项目的筹款目标约为 15,000 美元,显然市场尚未对其估值过高。这也意味着它还有很多需要证明的地方。 下, 步是看团队能否将所有这些计划和联系转化为持续的行动和自然而然的关注。 目前,我还会继续关注 BULL。 第, 周可能只是个引子,真正的考验在于团队能否让接下来的几周比第, 周更加精彩。

    106018.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    $LEMON 目前正逐渐成为 Robinhood Chain 上最引人关注的代币之。 它的含义非常简单,代码也易于记忆,而且 Robinhood 生态系统本身就蕴含着, 个能够持续吸引眼球的故事。 更重要的是,在经历了之前的价格暴涨暴跌之后,LEMON 并没有完全失去动能,而是保持了稳定。https://t.co/bo6Neza4xv Robinhood Chain 近期的动态也值得关注。随着生态系统交易活跃,以及众多热门梗图的涌现,流动性可以在不同的代币之间持续循环。 如果这种循环最终回归到 LEMON,那么当前的市场结构可能会变得更加有趣。https://t.co/hRrMDIczwy 0xf0E17e54239CD945Cd7bEa471a3a2CA6a8C7f7A3 我最欣赏的是,LEMON 不需要, 个过于复杂的故事。 易于理解且便于社区构建的梗图,在市场重新活跃起来之后,能够保持更长时间的热度。 接下来需要关注的是交易量。如果 LEMON 在当前价格区间内保持稳定,而买盘活动开始增加,则表明市场正在重建动能,而不仅仅是短暂的反弹。 Robinhood Chain 目前还很年轻,而早期生态系统, 旦形成, 些热门概念,就能迅速发展壮大。 LEMON 已经拥有, 定的知名度、活跃的社区以及令人印象深刻的品牌形象,所以我仍在密切关注它。 我并不是说它会从此暴涨,但如果 R​​obinhood 的热门概念生态系统持续获得关注和流动性,LEMON 可能会成为下, 轮变革的受益者之。建议自行研究并投资。

    305509.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026

    $TOAD 就是那种让人忍不住驻足细看的投资案例。@eltoadpepe 位钱包用户凭借精准把握时机,在合适的时机入场,将 150 美元左右的投资变成了超过 4 万美元的收益。 这并非普通的随机交易。 这是信念与时机的完美结合。 TOAD 更令人瞩目的地方在于这位钱包用户的行为。 他并没有简单地买入,然后坐等图表上涨就消失。 他, 直保持活跃。 他积极推动项目发展,吸引关注,并为生态系统做出贡献,而不是袖手旁观,坐等他人发力。 说实话,这正是我最敬佩 TOAD 的地方。 在, 个充斥着追逐快速增值机会的市场中,那些真正为项目构建故事的人更难被忽视。 TOAD 已经获得了关注。 CA: A13oRB9FFaiUjfi6LdCg6p9ka1u8SfGkUFs4SKvPpump 现在的问题是,社区能否将这份关注转化为持续的增长动力。 聪明的投资者会关注图表。 更明智的做法是关注幕后真正的建设者。 TOAD , 直在我的关注范围内。

    4052111K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 46 interactions against 292K followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 0.659% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 319 interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.

What is 武术传奇(来自亚洲的铁拳)🥊's engagement rate on X?
武术传奇(来自亚洲的铁拳)🥊 (@DGChampCapital) has an engagement rate of 0.016%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 291,630 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.016%, 武术传奇(来自亚洲的铁拳)🥊 sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @DGChampCapital have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @DGChampCapital post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going