Back to @CoinTalkX's profile

CoinTalk engagement report

@CoinTalkX - 461K followers on X

Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.008%
of 461K followers
Per impression
0.369%
9.5K views on a typical post
Reach
2.05%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
35
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.47/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 35 interactions against 461K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.5K times each, and 0.369% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 520 interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

CoinTalk's engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, CoinTalk sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,515 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,033 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 492 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 17, 202615x their median

    BREAKING: @dfinity founder Dominic Williams has spent years pursuing a vision of an on-chain alternative to traditional cloud infrastructure, aiming to move websites, applications and backend services directly onto a decentralized network. The Internet Computer is designed to run software entirely onchain through smart-contract-based canisters, combining persistent storage, computation and web serving without relying on conventional centralized cloud providers. Williams’ broader vision is to turn blockchain into a full-scale computing platform, with the Internet Computer continuing to expand its capabilities across AI, decentralized applications and other internet-native services.

    4168320125K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20267.3x their median

    🚨BREAKING: Zebec payroll business continues to expand, with @Zebec_HQ processing $54M in monthly payroll in August for 15,800 employees across 269 enterprise clients. Its card business is also running at a $71M annualized volume across 97 countries, showing a growing international footprint. Enterprise $USDC payroll on @StellarOrg has reached 18 clients, up from 15 previously. Meanwhile, Zebec has repurchased more than 504.7M $ZBCN, adding another notable development to its latest monthly figures.

    202449112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20264.5x their median

    NEWS: Blockchain could become the foundation for a new era of tokenized financial products, according to Sandy Kaul, Head of Innovation at @FTDA_US . Speaking at the recent @Avax Summit in New York, Kaul said she expects virtually every type of financial product to eventually be tokenized. She also described blockchain rails as “superior infrastructure” compared with the systems used today. Her comments highlight growing interest from traditional finance in blockchain-based infrastructure.

    13914318.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20264.3x their median

    NEWS: New York Life Investments, with more than $800 billion in assets, is bringing its first tokenized fund onchain through Avalanche ($AVAX) and Centrifuge. Its High Yield Corporate Bond Strategy marks another move by a major traditional asset manager into blockchain based fund infrastructure and the broader tokenized RWA market.

    13511418.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20264.2x their median

    JUST IN: @NEARProtocol has introduced confidential perpetuals trading on its Layer-1, making privacy the default for perps activity The infrastructure is powered by @HyperliquidX rails, bringing a new layer of privacy to on-chain derivatives trading. The launch could expand the utility of $NEAR while strengthening its position in the DeFi market. It also marks another step toward more private trading experiences within the ecosystem.

    135112013K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.8x their median

    JUST IN: @0xPolygon is preparing to permanently remove 100 million $POL from circulation, according to Polygon Foundation CEO @sandeepnailwal . The burn contract has already been deployed on testnet and is awaiting final Security Council signatures, with the tokens set to come from Polygon’s fee collector holding roughly 121 million POL. Once activated, the same mechanism could enable quarterly burns using future fee revenue. The move is part of Polygon’s broader strategy to make $POL increasingly deflationary as network activity expands.

    11316509.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.8x their median

    BREAKING NEWS 🚨: Arbitrum led the latest expansion in stablecoin market capitalization across major chains, adding $180.7M over the past 24 hours. Avalanche followed with $92.5M, while Hyperliquid, Aptos and Base added $30.2M, $11.5M and $4.2M respectively. Together, the five networks recorded $319.1M in combined stablecoin growth, highlighting a sharp increase in liquidity flowing across major onchain ecosystems.

    12274012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.7x their median

    NEWS: 📊 @dfinity is closing the gap with @Solana in on-chain activity, with both networks standing well ahead of other major blockchains in transaction volume over the past 30 days. According to ChainSpect’s monthly rankings, ICP processed 3.76 billion transactions, while Solana recorded 4.88 billion, putting the two networks at the top of the activity rankings. Other networks, including BNB Chain, TRON and Aptos, remain considerably behind those figures. It’s worth noting that transaction volume measures network activity, not on-chain financial transaction value, so these numbers should not be interpreted as capital flows or trading volume.

    115113117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20263.5x their median

    🚨 NEWS: Doosan Robotics, a leading South Korean collaborative robot manufacturer, is partnering with @peaq to bring industrial robots onchain through Solana. The first robot will run peaqOS, connecting its operations to blockchain-based infrastructure. The setup is designed to unlock new ways to finance robotic assets and generate revenue from otherwise idle capacity. The partnership highlights how onchain technology is expanding into real-world industrial automation.

    10613509.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.3x their median

    News: NEAR Protocol $NEAR and Arbitrum $ARB are among the strongest performers in the digital asset market, each gaining more than 70% over the past seven days. The sharp moves highlight renewed attention on L1 and L2 infrastructure with active developer ecosystems. Capital appears to be rotating toward networks where real applications and development activity are already taking place. @NEARProtocol and @arbitrum are now firmly in focus as momentum builds across the sector.

    1017809.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 35 interactions against 461K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.5K times each, and 0.369% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 520 interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

What is CoinTalk's engagement rate on X?
CoinTalk (@CoinTalkX) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 62 original posts from the last 30 days against 461,438 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, CoinTalk sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @CoinTalkX have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @CoinTalkX post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going