Back to @ClutchPoints's profile

ClutchPoints engagement report

@ClutchPoints - 350K followers on X

Measured over 100 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.005%
of 350K followers
Per impression
0.492%
3.7K views on a typical post
Reach
1.05%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
18
interactions (median)
Saved
0.027%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.73/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 350K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 100 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 16,684 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 0.492% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 100 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.

Measured over 100 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ClutchPoints's engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (16,684 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, ClutchPoints sits above the 10th percentile of the 167,119 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.13%
p750.613%
p902.36%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 167,119 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,016 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.13%
75th percentile0.613%
90th percentile2.36%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video99% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link1% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 99% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 125 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 202657x their median

    No.17 Alex Eala makes her US Open entrance to a loud ovation 👏 (via @espn) https://t.co/6V9i20XbDG

    9131055426K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202622x their median

    Alex Eala shines in her US Open debut beating Mary Stoiana 6-1, 6-2 🎾 (via @usopen) https://t.co/B6Dpb1IjrW

    35247109.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202621x their median

    "Thank you everybody for being part of my journey and making it such a pleasure to do my job." Alex Eala after her round 1 win in US Open debut 🗣 (via @espnW) https://t.co/lKzWaFYWkh

    33244009.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202621x their median

    Dean Wade told ClutchPoints’ @BrettSiegelNBA he was shocked to learn about LeBron James’ decision to join the Sixers: “I was actually outside playing with my daughter when my wife came out and said, ‘Hey, you need to look at your phone…’ I really thought it was fake at first. I didn’t believe it. “I was kind of fanboying at first with how excited I was. I never would’ve thought I would be teammates with LeBron.” (via https://t.co/Z4Jc1kn1VS)

    350213018K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202618x their median

    Chris Paul and Russell Westbrook throwing each other lobs on a yacht. Retirement never looked this good 🙌 (via cp3/IG) https://t.co/TtTFY42i0V

    294222213K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202618x their median

    Alex Eala takes the first set in her US Open debut, 6-1, over Mary Stoiana 👏 https://t.co/TijsxBpkwm

    281303326K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202616x their median

    Somebody get Caitlin Clark some goggles 😅 She accidentally sprayed Champagne directly in her eyes while celebrating Team USA's gold medal win in the FIBA World Cup 🍾 (via @Reese10Angel) https://t.co/yjwesMdBz5

    255343410K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202616x their median

    The Warriors’ dynasty was built on Steph, Klay, and Draymond, but their recent draft record and roster moves read like a massive timeline of missed opportunities 😳 Back in 2020, Minnesota offered the No. 1 pick to Golden State. The Dubs passed, the Wolves nabbed Anthony Edwards, and Golden State settled on James Wiseman at No. 2. To make matters worse, Jalen Rose revealed the Warriors actually told LaMelo Ball they’d take him before backing out at the last second. Then came Tyrese Haliburton. Bob Myers openly admitted the front office wrestled with selecting him after a killer workout, only to stick with Wiseman while Haliburton went on to become an All-NBA guard. The 2021 draft brought even more internal debate. Golden State's coaching staff and scouts wanted Franz Wagner at No. 7, but Joe Lacob pushed for Jonathan Kuminga. Fast forward to now: Wagner is an established, max-contract cornerstone in Orlando, while Kuminga is already off the team. To top it all off, Golden State completely botched their pursuit of LeBron James this summer. Even with Draymond opting out to help clear room this summer and reported mutual interest, LeBron stunned the league by signing with the Sixers instead. Between passing on Edwards, LaMelo, Haliburton, and Wagner, the Kuminga standoff, and failing to pull off the LeBron blockbuster, the Warriors' transition era is starting to look like a running reel of what-ifs. Does Steph deserve better? 🤔

    2422816726K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202616x their median

    Klay Thompson and Bobby Portis knock down back-to-back triples in the Heat’s scrimmage tonight 🎯🔥 (via @ZachWeinberger) https://t.co/ezSpAcJtTC

    264161111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202615x their median

    Life comes at you fast in the NBA 😳 Not that long ago, the Grizzlies looked like the future of the Western Conference. Back in 2022, they won 56 games, played with swagger, and seemed destined to be a championship contender for the next decade. Fast forward to 2026, and that entire core has been completely wiped off the roster. Here is the turnover Memphis has gone through over the last few years: 🔻 Ja Morant: Now with the Trail Blazers 🔻 Jaren Jackson Jr.: Now with the Jazz 🔻 Desmond Bane: Now with the Magic 🔻 Dillon Brooks: Now with the Suns 🔻 Steven Adams: Now with the Rockets What do you think was the biggest reason this Memphis core fell apart so quickly? 🤔

    2223115517K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 350K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 100 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 16,684 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 0.492% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 100 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.

What is ClutchPoints's engagement rate on X?
ClutchPoints (@ClutchPoints) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 100 original posts from the last 30 days against 349,563 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, ClutchPoints sits above the 10th percentile of the 167,119 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ClutchPoints have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (16,684 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ClutchPoints post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going