Back to @ChantalHbert's profile

chantal hébert engagement report

@ChantalHbert - 290K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.04%
of 290K followers
Per impression
0.571%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
6.95%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
115
interactions (median)
Saved
0.04%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.77/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 115 interactions against 290K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.571% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.8K interactions, about 59x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

chantal hébert's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.04%, chantal hébert sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,055 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video27% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link60% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 27% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 60% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 185 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 202659x their median

    Reminder that trade genius Howard Lutnick BELIEVED CANADA DIDN’T HAVE UNIONS. He actually said that. And he claimed that's why auto mfrs "moved" there. (Canada has: ✅always had a huge auto industry, and ✅yes has unions.) THIS is the mental wattage working on Canada-US trade👇 https://t.co/qruSmqGgIn

    4.6K1.3K727198551K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202616x their median

    Canada’s negotiating team tried to secure a deal for Canadians, which I’ve forcefully and vocally supported. I continue to stand ready to support and work with the Prime Minister. We will work together to do everything possible to protect the massive number of Nova Scotian and Canadian families, workers and businesses that have now been added to the large list of those directly impacted by President Trump’s devastating tariffs. It’s clear that we cannot trust or rely on the United States as we once did. This reality must make us more determined than ever to make Nova Scotia and Canada stronger. For Nova Scotia that means developing our own energy, developing our own natural resources and finding new markets for Nova Scotian goods and services. We have tremendous opportunities and I am fully committed to seizing them. Building up Nova Scotia is the only true path to protecting our future. Potential doesn’t build hospitals and roads. Turning potential into reality does. This is our time to find the common ground necessary to build. This is how we make ourselves stronger and protect our future. Let’s make it happen. Let’s go Team Canada!

    1.4K2082082455K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202612x their median

    Kirsten Hillman: "Our entire negotiating team signed confidentiality agreements, and so did the U.S. team. So all the people that are involved in those negotiations have commitments not to release the text that was being shared back and forth." (there goes another talking point) https://t.co/t7YGoxpiTQ

    95828610855194K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20265.0x their median

    A message from Prime Minister Carney. 🇨🇦 https://t.co/OqVx6plVTj

    4688981558K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.9x their median

    Yayoy Kusama: tout un voyage! https://t.co/NVKc47PxJT

    2862715011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.6x their median

    Mon premier rdv électoral hebdomadaire: Notes de campagne 1 | L’actualité https://t.co/eCNsKeZmJW

    263317220K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262.2x their median

    Ma plus récente chronique dans la version papier de L’actualité: https://t.co/WRJR4xiwjE

    2122115023K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    https://t.co/kOzoFmTGNS

    821221034K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    Qui dit vrai sur le français, Trump ou Carney? https://t.co/Y2FhEAPc4o

    9280317K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    Notes de campagne 2 https://t.co/A6cGLH1LVO

    6895011K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 115 interactions against 290K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.571% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.8K interactions, about 59x its own typical post.

What is chantal hébert's engagement rate on X?
chantal hébert (@ChantalHbert) has an engagement rate of 0.04%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 290,251 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.04%, chantal hébert sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ChantalHbert have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ChantalHbert post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going