Back to @Cat5SMASHICANE's profile

Johnny B. Good engagement report

@Cat5SMASHICANE - 246K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.254%
of 246K followers
Per impression
2.23%
28K views on a typical post
Reach
11.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
619
interactions (median)
Saved
0.526%
146 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.7/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 619 interactions against 246K followers, an engagement rate of 0.254%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 2.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 105x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tag: #weirdartrebels.

Compared with accounts its own size

Johnny B. Good's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.254%, Johnny B. Good sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,752 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,752 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,056 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 298 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 2026105x their median

    Embarrassing yourself is such a terrible feeling. Embarrassing yourself in front of alive studio audience or on television is the stuff of nightmares. You will now live in that moment forever thanks to digital technology. 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/WSYMSuldIr

    61K3.7K184734.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202656x their median

    First trailer for the ‘MESSI’ animated series. The series follows young Lionel Messi as he must lead a fight against villains who have kept the 10 realms under their control. Releasing in 2027 on Disney+ https://t.co/uwwzZgvEQP

    30K2.0K8391.7K2.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202620x their median

    💔 17 YEARS OLD. This is absolutely heartbreaking. Xavier Nungaray, a senior at Benjamin Franklin High School in Los Angeles, died after falling from a fourth-floor walkway at school. Video taken shortly beforehand shows another student punching Xavier and knocking him to the classroom floor. Xavier gets back up and runs out of the room, with the other student following behind him. Moments later, Xavier went over the railing. His family says Xavier had been bullied during high school and was afraid to report it because he feared he would end up being punished. We cannot know exactly what Xavier was thinking in those final seconds. But after watching that video, I can't help wondering whether this terrified 17-year-old was simply trying to get away because he believed he was about to be hit again. As of the latest reports, the student who punched Xavier has not been publicly reported as arrested or charged. LAPD is still investigating. Xavier's family described him as a “beautiful, caring and loving boy.” Seventeen years old. He should have been worrying about graduation — not running from someone at school. Absolutely devastating. 💔

    9.9K1.6K920131490K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20261.7x their median

    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Oh my god! King Zehn never disappoints. This is the funniest stuff I hear from the internet by far! https://t.co/j49rrgLzJ2

    9221358921K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    I loved watching my son play basketball when he was growing up. These buzzer beaters would have been great to watch 🏀🔥 https://t.co/bqkJEM5Nig

    947110115K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    BRING IT ON, BABY!!!!! 🎃 Hi. My names Johnny, and I have a problem. I'm addicted to everything fall and Halloween, including everything pumpkin spice. Yep, I'm one of them. Judge me if you want but I will keep smiling as I sip on my coffee. 🎃☕️😁 https://t.co/dHv0a4s8HH

    906210234K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    It’s a bacon cheeseburger kind of day. It’s a good thing I workout a lot. I’m going to run more tomorrow. https://t.co/hXjw67JDi8

    65481628.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026

    Welcome #WeirdArtRebels Shape Shifter Saturday First time challenge! Shape Shifter Art Show me how you shape shift! Who am I again? https://t.co/elDVj7FcFY

    4361946.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026

    Murica in CT! 💥🇺🇸🐴🤠👀 https://t.co/TkrSrr2vjm

    303413.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#weirdartrebels

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 619 interactions against 246K followers, an engagement rate of 0.254%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 2.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 105x its own typical post.

What is Johnny B. Good's engagement rate on X?
Johnny B. Good (@Cat5SMASHICANE) has an engagement rate of 0.254%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 246,282 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.254%, Johnny B. Good sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,752 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Cat5SMASHICANE have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Cat5SMASHICANE post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going