Back to @Cardschatter's profile

Darren Urban engagement report

@Cardschatter - 139K followers on X

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.028%
of 139K followers
Per impression
0.887%
4.3K views on a typical post
Reach
3.12%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
38
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 38 interactions against 139K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.3K times each, and 0.887% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 24% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 492 interactions, about 13x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #azcardinals, #azvssf, #arizona.

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #azcardinals, #azvssf, #arizona.

Compared with accounts its own size

Darren Urban's engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.028%, Darren Urban sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.127%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,596 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,062 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video24% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 24% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 120 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 21, 202613x their median

    CB Will Johnson has a neck injury and LaFleur said he could miss the season.

    37727375168K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202611x their median

    Will Johnson addresses his neck injury on his IG. https://t.co/MCZevxIidF

    400233439K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20268.5x their median

    RB Jeremiyah Love after two games: "I want to go crazy every single game. Last week I didn't. It's kind of hard. I come from a place where I'm going crazy every week. It's kind of humbling a little bit. ... It's been a challenge and I'm up for the challenge."

    31084018K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20268.4x their median

    Mike LaFleur on Marvin Harrison Jr.: "I'm not going to sit here and act like I don't know the narrative going on. This is the league. Naturally stuff comes across my desk. "But in between those walls, Marv is Marv. He's attacking it every day, just like his teammates."

    31163027K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20264.5x their median

    Brissett said he feels responsible for Marvin Harrison Jr. coming out of a game with no catches. “At some point the tide will change.” Team has not lost confidence in MHJ, he said.

    153214210K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.5x their median

    CB Garrett Williams does not have an injury designation for Sunday. Looks like he'll make his 2026 debut. https://t.co/ZgjUMZ9BrZ

    1217326.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20263.2x their median

    Marvin Harrison Jr. getting started at work Wednesday for #AZCardinals Didn’t see CB Max Melton, G Isaac Seumalo, DL Roy Lopez, LB Josh Sweat. https://t.co/53EuIrLxPf

    1088607.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20263.2x their median

    CB Will Johnson officially placed on IR for #AZCardinals, and as expected, they promote veteran CB Starling Thomas V to active roster from practice squad. Fill that PS spot with DL Jay Toia.

    1104339.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20262.9x their median

    For a second straight week, #AZCardinals don’t elevate anyone from practice squad for game. General good health for the roster.

    9962210K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20262.7x their median

    Angry run https://t.co/TW5UYVFsE0

    927202.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#azcardinals#azvssf#arizona#the1ne

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 38 interactions against 139K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.3K times each, and 0.887% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 24% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 492 interactions, about 13x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #azcardinals, #azvssf, #arizona.

What is Darren Urban's engagement rate on X?
Darren Urban (@Cardschatter) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 139,092 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.028%, Darren Urban sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Cardschatter have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Cardschatter post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going