Back to @BryceMcQuaid's profile

Bryce McQuaid engagement report

@BryceMcQuaid - 175K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 175K followers
Per impression
0.147%
5.1K views on a typical post
Reach
2.91%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 175K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.1K times each, and 0.147% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 89% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 412x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Bryce McQuaid's engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 9% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Bryce McQuaid sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,969 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,068 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link89% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 89% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 129 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 25, 2020412x their median

    Btw I have a wife now. ❤️ @RiaLuvsYou124 https://t.co/DqVmYosane

    3.1K421158View on X
  • Jul 15, 20265.5x their median

    Caught a bunch of cool Pikachus today! https://t.co/OMw5gKfiVX

    370702.9K viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 20263.5x their median

    My name is Bryce, and I have a crippling addiction to Meccha Chameleon 😔

    260202.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.9x their median

    I’ve been having an absolute blast with Halloween: The Game so far! Definitely a bit buggy, but it gives the old school F13 vibes I’ve always loved. Can’t wait to play more in the morning for the official early access release!

    221004.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.5x their median

    I got early access to Halloween: The Game, and I had a blast! Go check out my new video where I play my first rounds with Delirious, Cartoonz, Squirrel, & Kyle! https://t.co/O1bpn4K002

    173004.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.3x their median

    Hey @HalloweenTVG, any chance you could make it so that voices aren’t incredibly quiet in-game and insanely loud in the lobby. I really love being able to hear people in game, but it sucks having my ears destroyed in the lobbies/post game chat. 😭

    160205.1K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20262.3x their median

    Super grateful for all the amazing Meccha Chameleon lobbies over the last few weeks! This is why I love what I do 🥹

    171002.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.1x their median

    I got super early access to Halloween: The Game! Come check out another NEW video while you wait for the game to release! https://t.co/GltHnlAJxs

    141203.9K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 20262.0x their median

    I need more Meccha Chameleon in my life! This game has no right to be this good 😂

    140112.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    LIVE NOW with Super Early Access to Halloween: The Game! Come join the stream! https://t.co/CLOI8c6gAe

    83004.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 175K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.1K times each, and 0.147% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 89% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 412x its own typical post.

What is Bryce McQuaid's engagement rate on X?
Bryce McQuaid (@BryceMcQuaid) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 175,364 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Bryce McQuaid sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BryceMcQuaid have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BryceMcQuaid post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going