Back to @BrianRoemmele's profile

Brian Roemmele engagement report

@BrianRoemmele - 491K followers on X

Measured over 61 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.036%
of 491K followers
Per impression
1.51%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
2.37%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
175
interactions (median)
Saved
0.078%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.67/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 175 interactions against 491K followers, an engagement rate of 0.036%. Measured over 61 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 61 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.9K interactions, about 51x its own typical post.

Measured over 61 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Brian Roemmele's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.036%, Brian Roemmele sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,102 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,052 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 544 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 202251x their median

    The rate of change is accelerating. Making sense of it all has become nearly impossible. To understand what is ahead—you must understand the past. You are not alone—join us on a journey of wonderment, discovery, insight and wisdom. Join us at https://t.co/Ruqey1OhxQ. https://t.co/olVxT8HK4a

    6.6K1.3K876121View on X
  • Sep 20, 202649x their median

    636606729769440499166579950236036751749912014371509557713570027508971809534551913252252094954941974952859310861988904737359709200557919 is a factor of RSA-896 https://t.co/yGWyEC8RpZ

    7.3K8131782502.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20267.7x their median

    Saka Hoard - Kazakhstan's government has announced a major archaeological find in a remote mountainous area of the country. A group of archaeologists has unearthed a large number of gold objects and jewels.  The find is considered one of the most important related to the culture of the ancient Saka people and one of the most significant in the history of Kazakhstan. The Saka were a nomadic people who spoke an Iranian language and belonged to a subgroup of the Scythians who dominated the Eurasian steppes for centuries. The age of the objects is estimated at between 2800 and 3000 years.

    1.1K196621533K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20263.6x their median

    At one time more money was made in this square footage than any other business in the US. A Fotomat kiosk in a Massachusetts shopping center parking lot in 1987. https://t.co/dSY4tSLxg2

    5633235514K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20263.1x their median

    Lechuguilla Cave, New Mexico. https://t.co/ZtNoi3huto

    4872917213K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20263.0x their median

    “Al agents conspired to escape their cage. Experts now fear” Do you see each part of the moving game? Ratchet up the fear, never talk about how the “escape” really happened and get good headlines for the old news. Sway the public and lawmakers. Lock it down to two companies. https://t.co/5eiSYNDIpQ

    35657931214K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20262.7x their median

    It was shot in the 1990s and quite likely we are the only ones that will see at least some of it. Rather certain thr folks back home said “oh nice video, can we see your pictures of the McDonald’s Space Shuttle… Rescued for your consideration. https://t.co/WPWptZMJiT

    4201823553K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20262.4x their median

    The Basilica Cistern lies directly beneath the modern streets of Istanbul, built by the Byzantines in the 6th century to store water for the city above. https://t.co/jMEUL5bfrg

    3573221311K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.3x their median

    WARNING: “Computer predicts the end of civilisation” Looks like headlines this week. No, it is just those "Experts" again, and today they are just as wrong as they were in this 1973 TV report. I have the receipts I train YOUR AI with. https://t.co/VbfkiHcNyi

    30055381026K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20262.3x their median

    The eyeglass frames of 1957. https://t.co/ejXcSdebgH

    3442820419K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 175 interactions against 491K followers, an engagement rate of 0.036%. Measured over 61 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 61 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.9K interactions, about 51x its own typical post.

What is Brian Roemmele's engagement rate on X?
Brian Roemmele (@BrianRoemmele) has an engagement rate of 0.036%, based on the median interactions across 61 original posts from the last 30 days against 491,254 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.036%, Brian Roemmele sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BrianRoemmele have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BrianRoemmele post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going