PlayerSells
Back to @BlizzardCS's profile

Blizzard CS - The Americas engagement report

@BlizzardCS - 994K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 19, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 994K followers
Per impression
0.078%
34K views on a typical post
Reach
3.43%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
26
interactions (median)
Saved
0.003%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 994K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.078% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 16% carry an image or video and 87% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 199 interactions, about 7.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #midnight, #warcraft, #wow.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 19, 2026. Recurring tags: #midnight, #warcraft, #wow.

Compared with accounts its own size

Blizzard CS - The Americas's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 5% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Blizzard CS - The Americas sits above the 10th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.007%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.047%
p750.325%
p902.60%
p99357.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,981 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 447,404 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.047%
75th percentile0.325%
90th percentile2.60%
99th percentile357.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video16% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link87% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length--7%-8% to -5%9.0K
  • 16% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 87% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 163 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 7% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 5, 20267.7x their median

    #WoW We will be performing emergency maintenance and the game will be unavailable during this time. Thank you for your patience and apologies for any inconvenience caused.

    96793375K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20264.4x their median

    [#Bnet] We're currently investigating an issue affecting our authentication servers, which may result in failed or slow login attempts.

    42567135K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.2x their median

    The Curse of Ula'tek update for #Midnight introduces a new Discord integration allowing you to speak with your guildmates both in and out of the game! Our blog has info on linking your Discord and #Bnet accounts. https://t.co/rMea9yuS2a

    38415034K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20261.9x their median

    MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE: https://t.co/PiFYyKW2Tt https://t.co/PTVTAHyuhD

    29219041K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20261.9x their median

    The mists surrounding the Coiled Isle have parted, bringing tons of new adventure to #Midnight! The Coiled Isle is filled with activities from cursed fishing to daily quests, and more. https://t.co/TzDDpVnHm8

    18823033K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20261.8x their median

    #WoW We're investigating reports of games crashing or users disconnecting while playing. Thank you for your patience.

    4006035K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20261.5x their median

    [#Warcraft] Maintenance has completed & games are live. Thank you for your patience, everyone. See you in game!

    3306035K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 2026

    What better way to end the week than with the latest edition of WoW Weekly. Catch up on the most recent World of #Warcraft news here: https://t.co/Fu9vbeuBse

    2656135K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 2026

    Doing World of #Warcraft content below your current level? Make sure you have "Low-Level Quests" tracking on so you can see those quests marked on your map. https://t.co/P3zjoJDg9n

    3131035K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 2026

    From installation and patching issues to connection and performance troubles, we've got you covered. Visit the #Overwatch Technical Troubleshooting article for more information: https://t.co/FrDmpAnfJq

    14317036K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#midnight#warcraft#wow#bnet#overwatch

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 994K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.078% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 16% carry an image or video and 87% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 199 interactions, about 7.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #midnight, #warcraft, #wow.

What is Blizzard CS - The Americas's engagement rate on X?
Blizzard CS - The Americas (@BlizzardCS) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 994,197 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Blizzard CS - The Americas sits above the 10th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BlizzardCS have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BlizzardCS post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going