Astronomy Vibes engagement report
@AstronomyVibes - 89K followers on X
Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 214 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0.239%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.0K times each, and 4.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.9K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.
Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Astronomy Vibes's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 82% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.239%, Astronomy Vibes sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,752 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.604%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 2123 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 29, 202618x their median
🚨: Physicist Michio Kaku says dark matter isn’t matter at all. It is gravity leaking from a parallel universe. https://t.co/qNf2HJqwgS
- Aug 30, 202614x their median
🚨 NASA Spacecraft Just Hit a Mysterious “Wall” at the Edge of Our Solar System… 🚨 Out there, far beyond the planets… beyond Pluto… where sunlight fades into darkness, something unexpected happened. Voyager 1 — a spacecraft launched nearly 50 years ago — kept traveling into the unknown. No sound. No light. Just silence. And then… everything changed. Its instruments suddenly detected a strange, intense region. Temperatures rose. Energy surged. It was as if it had reached a boundary… a limit… a place where our solar system simply ends. Some describe it as a “wall of fire.” Not flames like we see on Earth… but a powerful, invisible force. A barrier between our Sun’s reach and the endless mystery beyond. Imagine that for a second… A human-made object, built decades ago, drifting billions of miles away… touching something no human has ever seen. What lies beyond that boundary? Is it just empty space… or something we don’t yet understand?
- Aug 27, 20267.7x their median
🚨 Elon Musk compares his work to miracles performed by Jesus Christ, Says Neuralink is "Jesus-level" tech. Elon Musk has once again ignited intense public debate by comparing his latest technological ventures to biblical miracles. During a recent video address at an event in Israel, the billionaire entrepreneur described the potential of his brain-computer interface company, Neuralink, as achieving "Jesus-level" results. Musk specifically highlighted the company’s goals of restoring mobility to tetraplegics and sight to the blind, suggesting these medical interventions parallel the legendary deeds of religious figures. While Neuralink has successfully implanted chips that allow users to control computer cursors with their thoughts, the comparison has drawn sharp criticism from those who believe Musk is inflating his company's current capabilities with messianic rhetoric. Despite the bold claims, industry experts note that Neuralink's current achievements align closely with existing brain-interface technologies rather than unprecedented breakthroughs. While the prospect of curing paralysis and blindness is undeniably revolutionary, the company has yet to provide definitive clinical evidence that its hardware can achieve these specific milestones. This branding follows a long-standing pattern of bombastic marketing from the SpaceX and Tesla CEO, who frequently uses high-stakes metaphors to drive valuation and public interest. As Neuralink moves deeper into human trials, the world is watching to see if Musk can deliver on these divine promises or if the rhetoric will eventually clash with the complex realities of medical science. source: Christian, J. (2026). Elon Musk Compares His Work to Miracles Performed by Jesus Christ. Futurism.
- Aug 25, 20267.4x their median
The Eye of God, the nebula that observes us from 650 light years away.😮 https://t.co/z7xiY1Srnm
- Sep 21, 20267.1x their median
⚡ PHYSICS JUST FOUND A THIRD KIND OF MAGNETISM… AND IT COULD CHANGE COMPUTERS FOREVER! 🧲 For more than 100 years, scientists believed magnetism mainly came in two familiar forms. One powers the magnets on your refrigerator, while the other works in a way that causes opposing magnetic forces to cancel each other out. But what if nature had been hiding a third form of magnetism all along? In a discovery that sounds like something from the future, researchers have provided experimental evidence of altermagnetism, a unique magnetic state that challenges the traditional way we understand magnetic materials. What makes it so fascinating is the unusual arrangement of its atoms. In altermagnetic materials, neighboring magnetic moments point in opposite directions, much like antiferromagnets. However, their magnetic structure also follows a special rotation within the crystal lattice. This subtle difference creates electronic properties that are not found in conventional ferromagnets or antiferromagnets. And this is where things become truly interesting. Because altermagnets produce almost no large-scale magnetic field, researchers are investigating whether they could help create smaller, faster and more energy-efficient electronic devices. The potential impact on computer memory and data processing is enormous. Scientists are exploring whether altermagnetic materials could eventually support faster switching, denser information storage and more efficient computing. Some projections suggest dramatic improvements in speed, but claims of memory operating 1,000 times faster should not be treated as an established technological result. Turning a laboratory discovery into a practical product requires years of further research. Researchers from the University of Nottingham and international institutions have investigated altermagnetism using advanced techniques, including experiments at the MAX IV synchrotron in Sweden. Their work on manganese telluride (MnTe) has helped scientists study and control this unusual magnetic state at a microscopic level. The most remarkable part of this discovery is that magnetism may be far more diverse than the simple categories we learned in school. Hidden inside the arrangement of atoms are properties that could eventually reshape how information moves through technology. A new chapter in magnetism may have just begun. And the biggest question is no longer whether this strange form of magnetism exists, but how far scientists can push it. 🔬 Source: Amin et al., Nanoscale imaging and control of altermagnetism in MnTe, Nature, 636, 348–353.
- Aug 27, 20264.5x their median
🚨 ATTENTION: A mysterious radio signal repeats every 16.35 days from a galaxy 457 million light-years from Earth. https://t.co/GOWaXQvsl3
- Sep 26, 20264.4x their median
🇩🇪 GERMANY IS TRYING TO BUILD A STAR ON EARTH — AND IT COULD CHANGE ENERGY FOREVER Deep inside experimental fusion machines, scientists are trying to recreate conditions similar to those inside a star. Instead of burning coal, gas, or oil, nuclear fusion works by forcing light atomic nuclei together, releasing huge amounts of energy in the process. The problem is that controlling this reaction on Earth is incredibly difficult. Germany is betting heavily on one unusual design: the stellarator. One of the companies leading the effort is Munich-based Proxima Fusion, a spin-off from the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. Its machines use incredibly powerful and precisely shaped magnetic fields to hold superheated plasma in place—plasma that can reach temperatures of millions of degrees. Proxima plans to build an experimental machine called Alpha near Munich in the early 2030s. Its goal is to demonstrate that a stellarator can produce more fusion energy than the energy used to heat and sustain the plasma. But Alpha would still be an experimental machine, not a commercial power plant. Proxima is planning a machine called Stellaris at the former Gundremmingen nuclear site in Bavaria. The company says it could become the first commercial stellarator designed to send fusion-generated electricity to the grid—potentially during the 2030s. Germany is not relying on one company alone. Its national fusion plans aim for a demonstration plant toward the end of the 2030s, followed by a first-of-a-kind fusion power plant in the 2040s. More than €2 billion in new public funding is being directed toward fusion research and infrastructure through 2029. Can humans actually turn a miniature star into a reliable power station? Creating fusion is one challenge. Controlling it continuously, extracting useful energy, protecting the machine from extreme conditions, and producing electricity economically are completely different problems. If Germany and other fusion programs can solve those problems, the payoff could be enormous: a new source of reliable, low-carbon electricity based on the same basic reaction that has kept the Sun shining for billions of years. The race is no longer just about proving that fusion is possible. The real race is to make it useful. And somewhere in Germany, scientists are now trying to take the first serious steps toward doing exactly that. Sources: German Federal Government Fusion Roadmap; Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics; Proxima Fusion
- Sep 25, 20264.1x their median
🚨 WHAT IF TIME HAS THREE DIMENSIONS — AND WE ONLY EXPERIENCE ONE? We think of time as a single road: yesterday behind us, today beneath our feet, and tomorrow somewhere ahead. But what if that picture is only a small part of reality? Physicist Gunther Kletetschka of the University of Alaska Fairbanks has proposed a striking alternative: time itself may have three dimensions. His 2025 mathematical framework describes a universe with three dimensions of time alongside three dimensions of space, creating a six-dimensional structure that is very different from the familiar picture of spacetime. (DOI) In this idea, time would not simply flow along one direction. The extra temporal dimensions could provide additional ways for physical states to evolve while still preserving cause and effect. In simple terms, reality might have more “directions” in time than the one we experience from moment to moment. Kletetschka argues that the mathematical structure of the three time dimensions can produce the three generations of fundamental particles — including the electron, muon and tau, as well as the different families of quarks. His calculations also produce specific particle masses and make predictions for quantities such as neutrino masses and possible new high-energy resonances. (DOI) That makes the proposal more than a strange philosophical idea about time. If its predictions are correct, experiments could potentially look for signs of this hidden structure. The paper points to future collider experiments, gravitational-wave observations and cosmological surveys as possible ways to test parts of the framework. (DOI) There is an even bigger question hiding underneath it all. Modern physics has two extraordinarily successful descriptions of nature: quantum mechanics for the microscopic world and general relativity for gravity and the cosmos. Bringing them together has remained one of physics’ deepest challenges. Kletetschka’s framework is presented as a possible route toward connecting these worlds by making the geometry of time fundamental. But there is an important distinction: this is a theoretical proposal, not an established replacement for modern physics. Its predictions still need to survive experimental testing and scrutiny from the wider scientific community. If reality really has three dimensions of time, then the universe may be far stranger than the simple timeline we experience every second. Are we moving through time… or are we seeing only one direction of a much larger temporal universe? Source: Gunther Kletetschka, Three-Dimensional Time: A Mathematical Framework for Fundamental Physics, Reports in Advances of Physical Sciences, 2025. DOI: 10.1142/S2424942425500045. (DOI)
- Aug 26, 20263.7x their median
🚨 According to Albert Einstein, past, present, and future coexist simultaneously, and the time as we perceive it would be nothing but an illusion. https://t.co/vntGipLruq
- Sep 22, 20263.4x their median
🌌 THE UNIVERSE HAS A SECRET CONNECTION — AND IT MAKES NO SENSE Imagine creating two particles, separating them by an enormous distance, and then discovering something deeply strange: when you measure one particle, the result of the other is immediately linked to it. But here’s the part that sounds impossible: nothing actually travels between them. No signal crosses the distance. No energy rushes from one particle to the other. And, according to everything we know about relativity, nothing carrying usable information can move faster than light. So what is happening? In quantum entanglement, two particles can share a single quantum state even after they are separated. Measuring one reveals information about the pair, producing correlations with the measurement of the other—even when they are extremely far apart. Scientists have tested this strange effect again and again, including experiments over distances of hundreds of kilometers and, in some cases, around a thousand kilometers. And yet Einstein’s cosmic speed limit remains intact. You cannot use entanglement to send a message faster than light. You cannot choose the result you want on one side and force a specific result on the other. That is what makes quantum entanglement so mysterious. The particles behave as if distance does not completely describe the relationship between them. Space may separate them, but their quantum state can still contain a connection that cannot be explained as an ordinary signal traveling through space. It is one of the clearest reminders that the universe may be far stranger than the world we experience every day. And perhaps the biggest mystery is not how two particles can be connected across enormous distances… but what that connection is actually telling us about the nature of reality. 🔬 Source: Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 — work on entangled photons and Bell inequalities; experiments demonstrating quantum correlations over long distances.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 214 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0.239%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.0K times each, and 4.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.9K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.
- What is Astronomy Vibes's engagement rate on X?
- Astronomy Vibes (@AstronomyVibes) has an engagement rate of 0.239%, based on the median interactions across 44 original posts from the last 30 days against 89,332 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.239%, Astronomy Vibes sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,752 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @AstronomyVibes have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @AstronomyVibes post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.