Back to @Achill_es99's profile

Achilles99 engagement report

@Achill_es99 - 159K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.015%
of 159K followers
Per impression
0.443%
5.0K views on a typical post
Reach
3.29%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
22
interactions (median)
Saved
0.02%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 159K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.0K times each, and 0.443% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 158x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Achilles99's engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, Achilles99 sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,969 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,068 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video89% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link76% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 76% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 384 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 13, 2026158x their median

    Some emotional touches on the audience and feel too emotionally 🄺😯 https://t.co/cMeDTZREUD

    3.0K24511171154K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026147x their median

    🚨 LMFAO!! Funniest president ever šŸ˜‚ REPORTER: It's pretty remarkable seeing you and Mark Cuban up there, he endorsed Kamala Harris back in 2024 TRUMP: Well, he made a mistake! CUBAN: 🤣🤣🤣 How the tables have turned! https://t.co/gUhHh0DZaa

    3.1K107224474K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20264.9x their median

    Liberal pushes open borders but bails when asked to take in a Somali refugee herself. Pure hypocrisy exposed šŸ˜‚ https://t.co/THXb1HxjcG

    9014315.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20264.8x their median

    Schiff walked in with that sign like he already had his moment, then Patel brings up the Russia collusion stuff and the FISA mess and suddenly the whole thing feels different. I actually paused it and replayed that part while eating my snacks because I wanted to make sure I heard it right. Schiff looked completely caught off guard. You could feel the room shift for a second. https://t.co/WN3Oz9PGkX

    91140014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20264.1x their median

    damn Trump is out here actually talking to cops, high-fiving fans and pointing at random folks in the crowd like they’re all buddies, everyone’s losing it recording him and he’s not acting all presidential distant, made me smirk cuz it’s so different from the polished nonsense we usually see, keeps it 100 for real. Trump keeping it 100 with the crowd and cops. Pure vibes no filter. https://t.co/wWeySoQ00u

    7911105.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20264.1x their median

    Mike Waltz didn’t hold back at all slamming CNN right to their face about fake corrections nobody reads and how they act entitled to White House access like it’s some god given right, made me chuckle when Dana got quiet, feels good seeing pushback instead of the usual softball stuff, reminds me why I skip their channel half the time anyway while munching on whatever’s in the fridge. Waltz cooked them live on this, Dana was shook. Fake news needs to fix their own mess first. https://t.co/h21EYuJJOE

    70111004.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.9x their median

    this Kash Patel clip hit different, he straight flipped it on Welch about that insane wealth spike like dude how you pulling that off while grilling everyone else, love seeing someone not take the nonsense lying down it’s kinda satisfying in a messy political world. https://t.co/kH28dpxEgT

    7310204.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.6x their median

    damn bros this one hit different, these little kids dragging a cake and tunes over to the old man’s place just cause he’s turning 93 and living next door, he’s looking all stunned at first then that grin creeps in and i’m over here grinning back at my screen like some fool, why can’t we all pull off random kind crap like that more often instead of endless complaining. https://t.co/yl6qDrZy7x

    727007.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20263.4x their median

    trump hit em with that year and a half no press conference line plus the ice cream bit, these reporters really thought they could whine about getting banned after babying biden forever, this energy is straight fire and i’m over here nodding like yeah tell em again while my dog just stares at me weird for yelling at the screen. Trump roasting the press on Biden’s softballs.
Ice cream questions for 18 months? Iconic. https://t.co/5Qp1VbWdqg

    668104.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.3x their median

    i was half watching with my phone on the pillow and then Kash said that and i literally sat up like he was talking to me. Durbin is doing the whole ā€œshe got shot five times and nobody charged herā€ thing and Kash just looks at him like… sir, are you asking me to charge her for getting shot?? then Durbin goes ā€œwell i can’t tell youā€ and i said out loud to nobody ā€œYOU CAN’T TELL HIM?? you literally brought it up??ā€ i rewound it because i thought i missed something. nope. that was actually the exchange. ate like three more chips sitting there for no reason. this is exactly why i stopped putting hearings on in the background. i end up arguing with the screen and my sister thinks i’m fighting with an actual person. https://t.co/rw7MmQJqes

    60850161K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 159K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.0K times each, and 0.443% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 158x its own typical post.

What is Achilles99's engagement rate on X?
Achilles99 (@Achill_es99) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 158,827 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, Achilles99 sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Achill_es99 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Achill_es99 post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going