Back to @virjust18's profile

TANVIR RANGREZ engagement report

@virjust18 - 77K followers on X

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.045%
of 77K followers
Per impression
4.35%
805 views on a typical post
Reach
1.05%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
35
interactions (median)
Saved
0.248%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 5 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 35 interactions against 77K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Posts are seen about 805 times each, and 4.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 331x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026. Recurring tag: #рдмрд┐рди_рдлреЗрд░реЗ_рд╣рдо_рддреЗрд░реЗ.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.045%, TANVIR RANGREZ sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 339 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 8, 2026331x their median

    рд╣рд╛рде рдореЗрдВ рдПрдХ рд╣реЗрд▓рдореЗрдЯ рдФрд░ рд╕рд╛рдордиреЗ рджреЛ рдЦреВрдВрдЦрд╛рд░ рд╢реЗрд░ ,, рдмрд┐рдирд╛ рдбрд░реЗ рд▓рдбрд╝рдХреА рдиреЗ рдмрдЪрд╛рдИ рдЕрдкрдиреА рдЬрд╛рди,,, https://t.co/M3GOyHiphb

    10K777392552.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20261.7x their median

    рдорд╣рд┐рд▓рд╛рдУрдВ рдХреА рд░рд╛рдЬрдиреАрддрд┐ рдореЗрдВ рддрд░рдХреНрдХреА рдХрд╛ рд░рд╛рд╕реНрддрд╛ рдиреЗрддрд╛рдУрдВ рдХреЗ рдмрд┐рд╕реНрддрд░ рд╕реЗ рдирд┐рдХрд▓рддрд╛ рд╣реИ ,, рдпреЗ рдХрд┐рд╕реА рдПрдХ рдкрд╛рд░реНрдЯреА рдХрд╛ рдирд╣реАрдВ рд╕рдмрдХрд╛ рдпрд╣реА рд╣рд╛рд▓ рд╣реИ , рдЬрд┐рддрдиреА рдмрдбрд╝реА рдзрд░реНрдорд╛рдзрд┐рдХрд╛рд░реА рдЙрддрдиреА рдмрдбрд╝реА рд╡реНрдпрднрд┐рдЪрд╛рд░рд┐ , ,,рдХрд┐рд╕реАрдВ рдХреЛ рдЖрдкрдХреА рдХрд╛рдмрд▓рд┐рдпрдд рдирд╣реАрдВ рдЪрд╛рд╣рд┐рдП рдЖрдкрдХрд╛ рд╢рд╛рд░реАрд░рд┐рдХ рд╢реЛрд╖рдг рдХреА рд▓рд╛рд▓рд╕рд╛ рд╣реИ ,, рдкреВрд░реНрд╡ рдиреЗрддрд╛ рд╕реАрдорд╛ рд╕рд┐рдВрд╣ https://t.co/ZdZ8dNEvp1

    381370805 viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    рд░рд╛рдЦреА рддреЛ рд░рд╛рдЦреА рд╣реИ ЁЯШВ рдХреИрдорд░рд╛рдореИрди рд╕реЗ рдкреВрдЫрддреА рд╣реИ рддреБрдореНрд╣рд╛рд░рд╛ рдХреИрдорд░рд╛ рдЯрд╛рдВрдЧреЛрдВ рдХреЗ рдиреАрдЪреЗ рдХреНрдпреЛрдВ рд╣реИ ,,, рдлрд╕рд╛рдирд╛ рдКрдкрд░ рд╣реИ рддреБрдо рдиреАрдЪреЗ рдЦрдВрдбрд╣рд░ рдореЗрдВ рдХреНрдпреЛрдВ рдЬрд╛ рд░рд╣реЗ рд╣реЛ ЁЯШВЁЯШВ https://t.co/UyDfdBfjJB

    198801.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    рдХреБрдЫ рднреА рдХрд╣реЗрдВ рдмрдЪреНрдЪреЗ рдХрд╛ рдЬреБрдЧрд╛рдб рдХрд╛рдмрд┐рд▓реЗ рддрд╛рд░реАрдл рд╣реИ , рдХреНрдпрд╛ рдЬреБрдЧрд╛рдб рд▓рдЧрд╛рдпрд╛ рдЪрдкреНрдкрд▓ рдХрд╛ рдлреАрддрд╛ рдбрд╛рд▓рдиреЗ рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП ЁЯСН https://t.co/nF9ZzyJdFZ

    19940470 viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    рджрд┐рд▓реНрд▓реА рдкреБрд▓рд┐рд╕ рдХреА рдПрдХ рдФрд░ рдШрдЯрд┐рдпрд╛ рдХрд░рддреВрдд рд╕рдореАрд░ рдЬреЛ рдПрдХ рд░рд┐рдХреНрд╢рд╛ рдЪрд╛рд▓рдХ рд╣реИ рдЙрд╕рдХрд╛ рд░рд┐рдХреНрд╢рд╛ рдЪреЛрд░реА рд╣реЛ рдЧрдпрд╛ рдерд╛ , рдЙрд╕рдиреЗ рд░рд┐рдХреНрд╢рд╛ рдЪреЛрд░ рдХреЛ рдкрдХрдбрд╝ рд▓рд┐рдпрд╛ рдФрд░ рдЕрдЪреНрдЫреЗ рдирд╛рдЧрд░рд┐рдХ рдХреЗ рдирд╛рддреЗ рдЪреЛрд░ рдХреЛ рдкреБрд▓рд┐рд╕ рдХреЗ рд╣рд╡рд╛рд▓реЗ рдХрд┐рдпрд╛ , рдкреБрд▓рд┐рд╕ рдиреЗ рдЙрд▓реНрдЯрд╛ рд╕рдореАрд░ рдХреЛ рдкреАрдЯрд╛ рдЙрд╕рдХрд╛ рд╣рд╛рде рддреЛрдбрд╝ рджрд┐рдпрд╛ рдиреЙрд░реНрде рджрд┐рд▓реНрд▓реА рдИ-рд░рд┐рдХреНрд╢рд╛ рдЪреЛрд░реА рд╣реБрдЖ рддреЛ рдпреБрд╡рдХ рдиреЗ рдЦреБрдж рддрд▓рд╛рд╢ рдХрд░ рдХрдерд┐рдд рдЪреЛрд░ рдХреЛ рдкрдХрдбрд╝ рд▓рд┐рдпрд╛тАж рд▓реЗрдХрд┐рди рдерд╛рдиреЗ рдкрд╣реБрдВрдЪрдиреЗ рдХреЗ рдмрд╛рдж рдЙрд╕реА рдпреБрд╡рдХ рдХреЗ рд╕рд╛рде рдорд╛рд░рдкреАрдЯ рдХрд╛ рдЖрд░реЛрдк! рдпрд╛рджрд╡ рдирдЧрд░ рдирд┐рд╡рд╛рд╕реА рд╕рдореАрд░ рдЕрдкрдиреА рдорд╛рдВ рдХреЗ рд╕рд╛рде рд░рд╣рддрд╛ рд╣реИ рдФрд░ рдИ-рд░рд┐рдХреНрд╢рд╛ рдЪрд▓рд╛рдХрд░ рдкрд░рд┐рд╡рд╛рд░ рдХрд╛ рдЦрд░реНрдЪ рдЙрдард╛рддрд╛ рд╣реИред рд╣рд╛рд▓ рд╣реА рдореЗрдВ рдЙрд╕рдХрд╛ рдИ-рд░рд┐рдХреНрд╢рд╛ рдЪреЛрд░реА рд╣реЛ рдЧрдпрд╛ред рд╕рдореАрд░ рдиреЗ рдЦреБрдж рддрд▓рд╛рд╢ рд╢реБрд░реВ рдХреА рдФрд░ рдХрдерд┐рдд рддреМрд░ рдкрд░ рдИ-рд░рд┐рдХреНрд╢рд╛ рдмрд░рд╛рдордж рдХрд░ рдЖрд░реЛрдкреА рдХреЛ рдкрдХрдбрд╝ рд▓рд┐рдпрд╛ред рдЗрд╕рдХреЗ рдмрд╛рдж рд╡рд╣ рдЪреЛрд░ рдХреЛ рд▓реЗрдХрд░ рдерд╛рдиреЗ рдкрд╣реБрдВрдЪрд╛ред рд╕рдореАрд░ рдХрд╛ рдЖрд░реЛрдк рд╣реИ рдХрд┐ рдкреБрд▓рд┐рд╕ рд╕реЗ рдорджрдж рдФрд░ рдХрд╛рд░реНрд░рд╡рд╛рдИ рдХреА рдЙрдореНрдореАрдж рдереА, рд▓реЗрдХрд┐рди рд╢рд┐рдХрд╛рдпрдд рдкрд░ рдХрд╛рд░реНрд░рд╡рд╛рдИ рдХрд░рдиреЗ рдХреЗ рдмрдЬрд╛рдп рдкреБрд▓рд┐рд╕рдХрд░реНрдорд┐рдпреЛрдВ рдиреЗ рдЙрд╕рдХреЗ рд╕рд╛рде рд╣реА рдХрдерд┐рдд рд░реВрдк рд╕реЗ рдорд╛рд░рдкреАрдЯ рдХреАред рдЕрдЧрд░ рдЪреЛрд░реА рдХрд╛ рд╢рд┐рдХрд╛рд░ рд╡реНрдпрдХреНрддрд┐ рдЦреБрдж рдЪреЛрд░ рдХреЛ рдкрдХрдбрд╝рдХрд░ рдкреБрд▓рд┐рд╕ рдХреЗ рдкрд╛рд╕ рдкрд╣реБрдВрдЪреЗ рдФрд░ рдЙрд╕реЗ рд╣реА рдерд╛рдиреЗ рдореЗрдВ рдорд╛рд░рдкреАрдЯ рдХрд╛ рд╕рд╛рдордирд╛ рдХрд░рдирд╛ рдкрдбрд╝реЗ, рддреЛ рдЖрдо рдЖрджрдореА рдХрд╛рдиреВрди-рд╡реНрдпрд╡рд╕реНрдерд╛ рдкрд░ рднрд░реЛрд╕рд╛ рдХреИрд╕реЗ рдХрд░реЗ? рдорд╛рдорд▓реЗ рдХреА рдирд┐рд╖реНрдкрдХреНрд╖ рдЬрд╛рдВрдЪ рдХрд░ рд╕рдЪреНрдЪрд╛рдИ рд╕рд╛рдордиреЗ рд▓рд╛рдирд╛ рдФрд░ рджреЛрд╖реА рдкрд╛рдП рдЬрд╛рдиреЗ рд╡рд╛рд▓реЛрдВ рдкрд░ рдХрд╛рд░реНрд░рд╡рд╛рдИ рдХрд░рдирд╛ рдЬрд░реВрд░реА рд╣реИред #Delhi #NorthDelhi #DelhiPolice

    6210144 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#рдмрд┐рди_рдлреЗрд░реЗ_рд╣рдо_рддреЗрд░реЗ

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 35 interactions against 77K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Posts are seen about 805 times each, and 4.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 331x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is TANVIR RANGREZ's engagement rate on X?
TANVIR RANGREZ (@virjust18) has an engagement rate of 0.045%, based on the median interactions across 5 original posts from the last 30 days against 76,917 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.045%, TANVIR RANGREZ sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @virjust18 have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @virjust18 post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going