Back to @really_ale's profile

Alito SP ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท ๐Ÿงš๐Ÿปโ€โ™‚๏ธ engagement report

@really_ale - 112K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
1.19%
of 112K followers
Per impression
3.84%
31K views on a typical post
Reach
30.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.861%
270 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 112K followers, an engagement rate of 1.19%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 3.84% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 28.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 24% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Alito SP ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท ๐Ÿงš๐Ÿปโ€โ™‚๏ธ's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 82% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.19%, Alito SP ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท ๐Ÿงš๐Ÿปโ€โ™‚๏ธ sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.499% to 2.09%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video71% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 75 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 202617x their median

    O @Felipinhosouza arrebentou meu cuzinho ๐Ÿฅต๐Ÿ”ฅ https://t.co/NWGglbYsRj

    18K2.7K6522190K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20268.2x their median

    Tava deixando o cu macio pra gravar agora ๐Ÿซฃ๐Ÿ”ฅ https://t.co/8MX75usyCD

    8.8K1.0K71997K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20267.4x their median

    Acordei querendo muita rola ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ๐Ÿฅต https://t.co/xJMA7GZ2HO

    7.9K945851379K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20266.2x their median

    hold up ๐Ÿ˜ถ https://t.co/DB2SfmPZ1q

    7.2K202356126K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20266.0x their median

    Bom dia babes ๐Ÿค“ https://t.co/WLoh6PxsJX

    6.6K63547670K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.7x their median

    A experiรชncia de gozar com uma mรฃo dentro do cu รฉ algo que eu definitivamente recomendo nรฃo deixar passar ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ๐Ÿ”ฅ @MlkFetishista https://t.co/8WBGNlD7pF

    3.9K49913255K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20263.6x their median

    ๐Ÿ˜ตโ€๐Ÿ’ซ https://t.co/Wm3sBnwCMl

    4.2K80175116K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.6x their median

    I'm ready for today's Collab ๐Ÿค“๐Ÿ”ฅ https://t.co/6LuxNoSupI

    2.8K24316238K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 2026

    Plans for tonight? ๐Ÿ‘€ https://t.co/g8sGlEQvaH

    1.1K9110131K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    Qual รฉ a boa hj? ๐Ÿ‘€ https://t.co/VFAngUkfp2

    868916020K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 112K followers, an engagement rate of 1.19%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 3.84% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 28.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 24% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is Alito SP ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท ๐Ÿงš๐Ÿปโ€โ™‚๏ธ's engagement rate on X?
Alito SP ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท ๐Ÿงš๐Ÿปโ€โ™‚๏ธ (@really_ale) has an engagement rate of 1.19%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 111,983 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.19%, Alito SP ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท ๐Ÿงš๐Ÿปโ€โ™‚๏ธ sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @really_ale have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @really_ale post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going