Faka 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇮🇱🇺🇸🇱🇧 engagement report

Best tweets

• Oct 5, 202668x their median

  A direita saiu vitoriosa da eleição, mas quem perdeu não foi a esquerda. Confira na análise. https://t.co/5vGxvjXWxM

  19K3.3K370132420K viewsView on X
• Aug 28, 202650x their median

  Durante mi militancia en el marxismo asistí a muchísimas charlas. Y con el tiempo empecé a notar un patrón muy interesante: Podíamos pasar diez horas hablando de cómo tomar el poder. Diez horas hablando de revolución, de estrategia, de organización, de activismo, de cómo derrotar al enemigo de clase, de cómo transformar las relaciones de poder. Pero había una pregunta que nunca aparecía: ¿Y después qué? Es decir: ¿Cómo vamos a crear riqueza? ¿Cómo vamos a organizar los incentivos? ¿Cómo vamos a asignar recursos escasos? Silencio. Y fue ahí cuando lo entendí. El marxismo tiene una obsesión patológica con conquistar el poder y una pobreza extraordinaria de respuestas sobre cómo utilizarlo para construir una sociedad funcional. La revolución está perfectamente descrita. La sociedad posterior, en absoluta oscuridad. Porque decir que algún día llegará una sociedad sin explotación, sin clases y sin contradicciones es muy fácil. Lo difícil es explicar cómo llegas hasta ahí sin destruir en el camino los mecanismos que permiten a una sociedad producir y prosperar. Y cuanto más preguntaba, más evidente se volvía. El marxista podía explicarte durante horas quién tenía la culpa. Pero cuando preguntabas cómo funcionaría concretamente esa nueva sociedad, las respuestas se hacían más oscuras. Y quizá por eso, cuando intentaba ahondar en estos temas, la conversación siempre volvía al mismo lugar: cómo tomar el poder. No pasaban de eso. Por eso hoy, cuando escucho a alguien hablar durante horas sobre la explotación, destruir el sistema y construir una sociedad nueva, mi primera pregunta es: ¿Cómo vas a hacerla funcionar? Nunca verás a un marxista responderte esto porque literalmente no puede, no sabe. Entonces deduce que, al igual que como con cualquier otra estafa piramidal, cuando hagas preguntas directas y concretas al marxismo, este intentará evitar en todo momento darte respuestas claras. Nunca lo olvides.

  11K4.6K562309247K viewsView on X
• Sep 12, 202616x their median

  Hi Dario and Sam 👋 If you want to slow down your AI development, feel free to do it. Anyone preventing you? Slow down, stop, or even shut down your AI. Why do you need the government to intervene?* *Answer: To stop your emerging competitors.

  4.6K63815935123K viewsView on X
• Sep 8, 202613x their median

  JUST IN 🚨: Bank of Japan is dumping Japanese Bonds at the fastest pace in history 📉 📉 https://t.co/nxiEUz77aM

  3.7K6807116377K viewsView on X
• Sep 21, 20268.0x their median

  Every government-issued paper currency in history has collapsed. Every single one. Rome debased the denarius until it held almost no silver. Weimar Germany printed the mark into oblivion by 1923, destroying middle-class savings in under four years. The Continental dollar, the French assignat, the Zimbabwean dollar, the Venezuelan bolivar. The list runs long and the ending never changes. Central banks manage fiat currency to fund government spending that tax revenue cannot cover, not to protect your purchasing power. Inflation is a tax. Every dollar created without corresponding production transfers purchasing power from savers to first spenders, which is always the government and its connected institutions. The dollar has lost over 97% of its purchasing power since the Federal Reserve opened for business in 1913. That loss did not happen accidentally; the Fed ran the printing press, and you absorbed the damage. Defenders will argue that modern central banking is more sophisticated than Weimar. The math remains identical: spend beyond revenue, monetize the gap, dilute the currency. Sophistication only determines the speed of the destruction. No fiat currency has ever survived indefinitely. Not one government has voluntarily relinquished the power to inflate. Given those two facts, the current dollar's long-term trajectory requires no guesswork.

  1.8K6151498963K viewsView on X
• Oct 1, 20266.9x their median

  Communist Friends! https://t.co/J7RB0Lel8q

  1.8K488352854K viewsView on X
• Sep 22, 20266.2x their median

  Uma tarefa hercúlea: explicar para um esquerdista o que é ser de esquerda; explicar para um marxista comunista o que é, na prática, ser comunista. Os objetivos declarados dos comunistas são apenas cenouras de burro. O objetivo real não é abolir a elite, e sim se tornar a elite, e através dela chegarem ao exercício total de poder e controle.

  1.8K247691135K viewsView on X
• Sep 23, 20265.4x their median

  Quem se lembra do piloto japonês da F1 Satoru Nakajima? Era aquele piloto "barbeiro", braço duro, das décadas de 80 e 90, que vivia batendo e rodando sozinho nas pistas, frequentemente indo parar nas caixas de brita. Eu me lembrei dele na semana passada, ao responder de forma direta à pergunta do @FelipeSestaro sobre "porque o PT tem que sair do poder". Com @luizferoxo e @FelipeSestaro para o @irontalksbr podcast.

  1.5K25163657K viewsView on X
• Sep 27, 20265.2x their median

  Carl Menger published On the Origins of Money in 1892, and it remains arguably the most devastating refutation of the statist theory of money ever written. Menger worked in Vienna during the late 19th century, when the German Historical School dominated European economics. That school rejected universal economic laws and insisted governments shape institutions deliberately. Menger spent his career dismantling that claim. His 1871 "Principles of Economics" launched the marginalist revolution, and his 1892 essay finished the job on monetary theory specifically. The core argument is simple and brutal: nobody invented money. No king decreed it, no parliament voted it into existence. Individual traders, acting on self-interest, gradually converged on the most saleable commodity available to them. Gold and silver won because they are durable, divisible, portable, and scarce. This process happened spontaneously, across cultures, without central coordination. Menger called the most saleable good the most "liquid" commodity, and traced how liquidity differences between goods naturally selected winners over centuries of voluntary exchange. Menger exposes the state's foundational lie: that money derives its validity from government authority. Every central bank, every fiat currency regime, every IMF directive operates on that lie. The Federal Reserve, which prints dollars with no commodity anchor and has destroyed roughly 97% of the dollar's 1913 purchasing power, exists entirely because the state captured and corrupted a spontaneous market institution. Menger's legacy is the intellectual ammunition to say clearly that central banks are parasites on a system they did not build and cannot improve. The market created money, then Governments hijacked it.

  1.3K384803760K viewsView on X
• Aug 25, 20264.0x their median

  The natural state of a free market economy is deflation. Technology makes production cheaper every year. Your 2026 iPhone costs less in real labor-hours than a 1995 Nokia cost. Hard drives, food processing, logistics: all get cheaper when producers compete and innovate without interference. This matters because it reframes every inflation conversation you've ever had. The Federal Reserve doesn't just inflate prices from zero. It inflates them on top of a natural deflationary baseline. If technology would have dropped your cost of living 3% annually, and the CPI shows 4% inflation, your real purchasing power destruction runs closer to 7%. The CPI itself is a bureaucratic construction built on hedonic adjustments, substitution assumptions, and owner's equivalent rent rather than actual housing costs. These methodological choices consistently produce lower numbers. Sound money advocates since Murray Rothbard have pointed this out for decades. You feel this in your wallet. Grocery bills, rent, insurance, college tuition: the prices you actually pay have outpaced official CPI figures for twenty years running. The government measures inflation with a rubber ruler and then congratulates itself for keeping it low.

  993247674272K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Keep going