Back to @nathanlawkc's profile

Nathan Law 羅冠聰 engagement report

@nathanlawkc - 329K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.01%
of 329K followers
Per impression
0.281%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
3.68%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
34
interactions (median)
Saved
0.058%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.17/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 34 interactions against 329K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.281% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 522x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, Nathan Law 羅冠聰 sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 95 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 10, 2026522x their median

    This is tonight in Tehran. People have taken over the streets. Iran is still under a total blackout. Only very few people have access to Starlink, and the regime is actively trying to jam and disrupt it. Despite everything, the streets are alive and the world is being kept in the dark. People are chanting: "Until the mullahs are dead, this homeland will not be free."

    14K3.7K265126468K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 2025113x their median

    The largest rally in Hong Kong's history took place exactly six years ago today—2 million people marched for freedom and democracy in a city of 7.5 million. I was stuck at the rally for hours because of how crowded the streets became. https://t.co/pIUbiwSC2B

    3.0K60122846242K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 202595x their median

    Carter Ruck calling newsdesks to shut down aspects of the PRC spy case & Cabinet Office deploying ex-officials to lie to the lobby about PRC penetration of MI6 data systems. Gongs all round in the Cabinet Office. Trebles all round in the Inner Temple. Dear lobby, send cameras to Hounslow - get pics of the MI6 data hub inside the PRC infrastructure. But will anything much happen? No. MPs will forget about it in a week, the media circus will move on, the farces will continue, gongs all round for the officials who let PRC buy data infrastructure used for secret data, PRC will continue stealing and *just buying* crucial intel and IP, yookay global reputation sinks even further... London lawyers compensating for loss of some Russia-KGB cash with PRC-intel cash, good for Cotswold property market. *The system is working as intended* BUT - Washington is waking up to what Whitehall has done, Whitehall has lied to the CIA/NSA/NRO etc, actions have consequences, Starmer approving the PRC spy centre above the data cables under London is now a political nightmare with Whitehall squeezed between Beijing and DC deep state...

    2.4K6968364271K viewsView on X
  • Jun 7, 202685x their median

    China, in Xi’an, at a railway station so ordinary that nobody would ever think to write about it, a ticket clerk paused for a moment and told me: “Be careful, the water is hot.” I showed my passport many times. And honestly, I preferred that inconvenience to the alternative of never showing a passport but constantly looking over my shoulder in the street. Grand speeches about freedom mean little if people do not feel safe in their daily lives. I love Europe far too much to pretend that everything is fine. We spend endless hours debating the future, drafting strategies, and discussing values, while too often neglecting the simple things that make a society work: attention, responsibility, order, and basic civic trust. Europe needs to regain its sense of direction. It really does.

    2.4K13931845637K viewsView on X
  • Feb 9, 202660x their median

    BREAKING: Jimmy Lai, the pro-democracy former Hong Kong media tycoon and a fierce critic of Beijing, is sentenced to 20 years in prison in one of the most prominent cases prosecuted under a China-imposed national security law. https://t.co/YE6s2IJw1X

    1.1K621151135634K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202536x their median

    Happy birthday, @joshuawongcf. At such a young age, you’ve already endured more than four years in prison. Who knows how many more years Beijing will try to steal your freedom with fabricated charges. Stay safe, my friend. I know we’ll meet again one day. https://t.co/7l6LRTM4hS

    1.0K19712245K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 202630x their median

    Even if you don’t like the state of US politics, it’s never justifiable to idolise or normalise Mao’s atrocities. Many people pointed out what Mao did to the PRC that caused millions of deaths, making him the person who’s responsible for most deaths in history. The disgust is more than that. If you think by defending him you’re defending the ideology that you believe (communism/socialism), then you’re making a HUGE mistake. First and foremost, Mao did everything mostly for himself, instead of serving the -ism. Many books documenting the atrocities in Cultural Revolution (my favourite one “Captive Spirits: Prisoners of the Cultural Revolution”牛鬼蛇神錄 that I read in jail) revealed stories that ordinary people were persecuted regardless of their political ideologies — one can be a proletarian revolutionary but labelled as “counter-revolutionary” and thrown in jail just because they talked to Mao’s political enemies INSIDE the party, with roughly same ideologies. The Great Leap Forward was disastrous and man-made, not just a famine in a natural-disaster way. It’s not difficult to tell Mao is a power-grabbing demagogue. So many got killed (even if they were ideologically aligned with the regime) because of their family background, born at the wrong time, or simply seen as not loyal enough to Mao. The revultionary/counter-revolutionary distinction and narratives were mostly just a tool to persecute. Idolising or normalising what Mao did was not defending socialism/communism — it’s fantasising a worshipping cult that permits the leader to power-grab through mass murder under the facade of a certain ideological dreamland.

    70112617219121K viewsView on X
  • Dec 3, 202526x their median

    The killer Hong Kong fire shows how freedom is an even greater loss than you'd think “Bid rigging” has been a politically contentious issue in Hong Kong. As these types of corruption scandals became more rampant, watchdogs and civil groups formed the “anti-bid rigging coalition” in 2014. The founders of the network included pro-democracy Hong Kong legislators who were later jailed as part of the government’s political crackdown. Former Democratic Party legislator Lam Cheuk Ting, who served as the face of the coalition, has been jailed since 2021 for participating in a primary election under the notorious National Security Law (NSL). ... If the Wang Fuk Court controversy had taken place 10 years ago, when politics were more plural and amicable to whistleblowers and watchdogs, Lam would have taken the lead and constantly pressured the authority to address the long-standing concerns. Questions would have been tabled in the Legislative chamber, senior officials would have been summoned to meet with the concerned groups and explain the issues. Independent media would conduct an investigative report, and the public need not worry about retribution for speaking out.

    66317941432K viewsView on X
  • Nov 25, 202512x their median

    The BN(O) visa route changes are unnecessary, and critically damaging to the government. After the 1984 Joint Declaration and the transfer of sovereignty in 1997, while holders of the British National (Overseas) (BN(O)) passport were not granted the right of abode in the UK, the UK government committed that they would act swiftly when the political rights and freedoms of Hongkongers were endangered. This commitment was reinforced with the Foreign Secretary regularly submitting the Six-monthly Report on Hong Kong to Parliament, continuously reviewing the political situation. In 2020, the Boris Johnson government introduced the BN(O) visa route as a humanitarian pathway, on the basis of its "profound ties of history and friendship" and "deep historical obligation." The Home Secretary at the time (Priti Patel) claimed that this new visa route delivered on the UK's "solemn commitment." It was a reaction to the implementation of the National Security Law in Hong Kong. The political persecution in Hong Kong has only worsened since. It has been over four years since the pathway was first introduced (January 2021). As of March 2025, over 179,000 Hong Kongers have been granted visas and relocated to the UK, seeing the country as their new home. Hong Kongers have already brought, and will continue to bring billions of pounds of capital into the country. Analyses show that BN(O) visa holders will bring an estimated over £3 billion in retirement savings from Hong Kong to the UK. Estimates from property consultancy firms show BN(O) visa holders have spent billions of pounds in the UK housing market. This community also contributes to the UK economy via entrepreneurship and as high-skill workers. From historical, moral, and economic perspectives, it would be unwise, or even become a terrible political whirlwind, to introduce new guardrails and restrictions on the inflow of BN(O) holders. It’s a widely popular policy in the UK, which is, in fact, quite rare. Most of them support Hong Kong protesters who are unjustly persecuted and need safety in the UK. The government should give more thought to the treatment of refugees from Hong Kong, as this is widely seen as part of the historical and moral obligation as well.

    2936932629K viewsView on X
  • Feb 10, 20267.9x their median

    Latest op-ed at @guardian. Link below //Given Lai’s deteriorating health, time is running out for action. The UK can safeguard this agreement by placing the argument for Lai’s release at the heart of UK-China relations and elevating his case to a matter of national importance.// https://t.co/ihhOfP7gfs

    1445562715K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 34 interactions against 329K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.281% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 522x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Nathan Law 羅冠聰's engagement rate on X?
Nathan Law 羅冠聰 (@nathanlawkc) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 328,898 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, Nathan Law 羅冠聰 sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @nathanlawkc have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @nathanlawkc post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going