Back to @moneybirdette's profile

Moneybirdette engagement report

@moneybirdette - 316K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.019%
of 316K followers
Per impression
0.554%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
3.43%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
60
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 316K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.554% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.1K interactions, about 69x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cuck, #goddess, #bbc.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #cuck, #goddess, #bbc.

Compared with accounts its own size

Moneybirdette's engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.019%, Moneybirdette sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video41% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 41% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 123 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 7, 202669x their median

    OUT NOW ON MY VIP!! @duncansaint00 🔥🔥🔥 brand new anal! Link in bio https://t.co/lrqsURgxrc

    2.0K2.1K361164K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202626x their median

    I love how @duncansaint00 came to my home and I was a good girl and let him use my asshole :) what a perfect cock https://t.co/fSC43AyJ7a

    1.5K998027K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202619x their median

    Im ready to be used https://t.co/KF1eqbV9Xx

    1.0K5818012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202614x their median

    Lick me https://t.co/fARKW1qz7U

    7762114013K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202613x their median

    Im so horny today like my minds racing id probably let anyone fuck me right now https://t.co/saXWVrWGBI

    7433711013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20269.9x their median

    What are some really dope solo scenes and themes that you wanna see from me. I'm stepping it up booking locations doing some really cool solo videos coming this winter drop in the comments below some stuff you'd wanna see and different themes especially and different lingerie https://t.co/lOXHsC4zrb

    563238014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20267.3x their median

    My pretty bow :) https://t.co/YP9avfqP58

    420162011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20266.8x their median

    Step into my office and say ahhh @CvatikPhoto https://t.co/UoMxSVOn5t

    392162012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20266.3x their median

    Good morning ☀️ https://t.co/R3tMlxMWlx

    366123012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20263.1x their median

    I want a relationship 🥹 someone to grow with and make content with. I wouldn't even film with anyone else 💕

    161420225K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cuck#goddess#bbc#bigass#brooklyn

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 316K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.554% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.1K interactions, about 69x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cuck, #goddess, #bbc.

What is Moneybirdette's engagement rate on X?
Moneybirdette (@moneybirdette) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 315,815 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.019%, Moneybirdette sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @moneybirdette have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @moneybirdette post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going