Back to @match_no3's profile

松田宣浩 engagement report

@match_no3 - 319K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.472%
of 319K followers
Per impression
3.66%
41K views on a typical post
Reach
12.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.044%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 319K followers, an engagement rate of 0.472%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 3.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 9.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

松田宣浩's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 82% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.472%, 松田宣浩 sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.5%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 111 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 26, 20269.1x their median

    映画、ちいかわ‼️良かったです‼️ 熱男魂‼️ https://t.co/BM4bnmRKv8

    11K1.8K47377722K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20269.0x their median

    母校、岐阜県代表中京高校甲子園に応援行ってきました‼️ 本当に感動をありがとう、お疲れ様でした‼️ バックネット裏からとアルプス席で観戦できて良かった、素晴らしかったです‼️ 中京魂‼️熱男魂‼️ https://t.co/3vl2jtCI4I

    13K83252172979K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.5x their median

    東京観光① ちいかわパーク行ってきました‼️ ちいかわ、島二郎、セイレーン発見‼️ 皆さん誰好きですか❓熱男魂‼️ https://t.co/k46CQHNIQq

    5.8K76058100257K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.2x their median

    東京観光② ちいかわベーカリー行ってきました‼️ くりまんじゅうの焼きそばパンうまい‼️➕原宿、熱男魂‼️ https://t.co/DGYQqzUuXY

    5.6K6761587258K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 20264.1x their median

    ドアラさんと2ショット撮っていただきました‼️ ドアラさんありがとう、感謝‼️ 熱男魂‼️ https://t.co/Kf7JX4rbpJ

    5.6K5941538151K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 20263.6x their median

    松田ツインズ、さんま御殿に出演させていただきます‼️ 皆さん見てください、熱男、熱男、熱男‼️ 熱男魂‼️ https://t.co/GeyKzX0YXX

    5.0K3872123430K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20262.8x their median

    サントリードリームマッチに参加しました‼️ 素晴らしいプロ野球の先輩、後輩と東京ドーム楽しくプレーできました‼️ 和田さん、攝津さんとも対戦しました‼️超満員でした、皆さんありがとうございました‼️熱男魂‼️ https://t.co/A3nEE1aLTZ

    4.0K226115101K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 20262.3x their median

    素晴らしいです‼️ 山笠のシーズンですね‼️熱男魂‼️ https://t.co/KHqN2uPspp

    3.2K1822583K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 20262.3x their median

    KBCさん、ソフトバンク対オリックス戦森福さんと解説ご一緒でした‼️ 試合後、ヒーローの牧原選手にお話聞くことができました‼️ 熱男魂‼️ https://t.co/T15lgjehGx

    3.2K204111576K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20262.2x their median

    サッカー日本代表の皆さん、ワールドカップ本当にお疲れ様でした‼️ 最初から最後まで全力プレー素晴らしかったです‼️ 熱い、熱い試合でした‼️熱男魂‼️ https://t.co/cZVZlBmKce

    3.2K1415257K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 319K followers, an engagement rate of 0.472%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 3.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 9.1x its own typical post.

What is 松田宣浩's engagement rate on X?
松田宣浩 (@match_no3) has an engagement rate of 0.472%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 319,368 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.472%, 松田宣浩 sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @match_no3 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @match_no3 post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going