Back to @malikayane's profile

Malika Ayane engagement report

@malikayane - 247K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.069%
of 247K followers
Per impression
2.12%
8.1K views on a typical post
Reach
3.28%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
172
interactions (median)
Saved
0.056%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.13/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 172 interactions against 247K followers, an engagement rate of 0.069%. Posts are seen about 8.1K times each, and 2.12% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 9.6x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.069%, Malika Ayane sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link75% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 75% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 134 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 15, 20269.6x their median

    Tom Waits' first new recording in eight years is a collaboration with Massive Attack. https://t.co/YUM52iVFGa

    1.4K222164565K viewsView on X
  • Nov 30, 20254.0x their median

    Se non ricordo male la riviera ligure è incantevole a febbraio... @SanremoRai #Sanremo2026 https://t.co/0YWqfJ8bVV

    62926211360K viewsView on X
  • Nov 23, 20252.7x their median

    Nella sua prima vita, quando io l’ascoltavo e già la adoravo (mentre le mie coetanee sentivano i Duran Duran), Ornella non era affatto popolare. Anzi: aveva costruito la sua immagine sulla distanza, sui salotti colti milanesi - tra cui il suo, nella mitologica casa di Largo Treves - sul teatro di Strehler. Chissa, magari qualcuno le aveva detto “sii stronza, tiratela come fanno le dive”: in effetti lei risultava quasi antipatica perché era snob (o forse soltanto timida), le donne percepivano la sua sensualità come una minaccia, la vedevano come una “rubamariti” e le preferivano Mina, tecnicamente immensa, che però ci priva della sua presenza dal 1978 (too much… a proposito!). È soltanto di recente, con l’arrivo del nuovo secolo e poi del grillismo, che Ornella ha compreso che era necessario cambiare cifra e infrangere il muro della ieraticità… “e si è fatta donna” (citazione un po’ da miscredente, come era lei), diventando quasi una di noi. Tra gli addetti ai lavori si dice che lo abbia fatto per bisogno e forse in qualche intervista lo ha anche accennato, scherzando, lei stessa: fatto sta che, all’alba dei suoi 75-80 anni, quando il mondo della musica stava ormai dimenticando la sua arte, è tornata alla ribalta, grazie anche a Fabio Fazio che le ha offerto la scena e una seconda vita. E lei la scena se l’è giocata non tanto sulla musica - la sua voce fatalmente si era un filo incrinata negli anni - ma sul personaggio: solo nella sua seconda vita abbiamo conosciuto l’autoironia e l’intelligenza viva di Ornella. Al punto che ci si chiede se paradossalmente l’addio di Mina possa un giorno (auspicabilmente il più tardi possibile) non essere accompagnato dallo stesso cordoglio e affetto che gli Italiani stanno manifestando per Ornella, di cui oggi si sta parlando ovunque: nei negozi, nei ristoranti, camminando per strada, perfino nelle chiese. Da oggi non manca più soltanto la sua musica: ci manca proprio lei, Ornella. #ornellavanoni #CiaoOrnella (Nel video, carrellata delle sue canzoni più belle)

    4173815274K viewsView on X
  • Dec 14, 20252.3x their median

    animali notturni #Sanremo2026 https://t.co/3xTVA9vqRb https://t.co/plivXgpaBr

    3631420211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    “detto tra noi” è nata 🧡 https://t.co/k3wgZTgkIj https://t.co/2U7dNJGdy4

    19010819.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    La MALInconica lucidità dell’età adulta, il mare d’inverno, le luci dell’alba e quel pensiero rivolto al “poi”, ogni volta che qualcosa di nuovo comincia. Questa è “detto tra noi”, una canzone alla quale voglio molto bene 🧡 Il video è su YouTube: https://t.co/NoWFQCIxkD https://t.co/8JF1S9qOvD

    16220916.3K viewsView on X
  • Feb 23, 2026

    Gli animali notturni escono finalmente dalla loro tana @SanremoRai #Sanremo2026 https://t.co/JsXa84TgLO

    1408806.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    "cicale" fuori il 18.09 "detto tra noi" fuori il 4.09 sono felice pre-order: https://t.co/ENoFfTjr5Q https://t.co/xY5WgXlPgp

    119149910K viewsView on X
  • Feb 26, 2026

    Gli animali notturni votano 03 CODICE 03 894.001 FISSO 475.475.1 SMS https://t.co/zUlAWqOSbM

    12181136.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    Ci vediamo in giro https://t.co/akqAjjfaNY

    381103.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 172 interactions against 247K followers, an engagement rate of 0.069%. Posts are seen about 8.1K times each, and 2.12% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 9.6x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Malika Ayane's engagement rate on X?
Malika Ayane (@malikayane) has an engagement rate of 0.069%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 247,016 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.069%, Malika Ayane sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @malikayane have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @malikayane post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going