Back to @hungucbrazilian's profile

Gabriel Hung engagement report

@hungucbrazilian - 241K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
1.03%
of 241K followers
Per impression
3.22%
77K views on a typical post
Reach
32.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
1.21%
936 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.5K interactions against 241K followers, an engagement rate of 1.03%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 77K times each, and 3.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 32.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 100K interactions, about 40x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Gabriel Hung's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.03%, Gabriel Hung sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.5% to 2.09%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 216 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 202340x their median

    One of my favorite bottom scenes ever, I jerked off so many times editing it!! This fuck was so intense and loud. Taking @Roxas_caelum HUGE dick felt amazing it made me so hungry for it, come watch the hottest video you’ll see today !😈🀀 https://t.co/00SL3kUNBz https://t.co/F9knV6Lkvk

    78K22K3051246.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20265.5x their median

    YOU HAVE NO IDEA!! no idea how it feels to have that horse dick pumping his load sooooo deep inside you, his loading pulsing was soo strong and warm i could feel it sooo deeep, i just cant put in words ... all i say is that i need MORE!!! on my page today https://t.co/DzS5qkYSvg

    12K1.7K387144K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.8x their median

    DUDEEEEE ITS INSANEEE!! it feels sooo amazing, you cant tell how out of myself i was, heaven maybe ? ughhh soo good ! The biggest one to date , anyone bigger ? https://t.co/CDusV4GxUx

    10K1.6K296147K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.7x their median

    DUDE!! HIS MONTER WAS TOUCHING MY BELLY BUTTON , it was intense but if you ask me if i want more i sure DO !!! He got me REAL pregnant with his loads @AndresHenri_ https://t.co/PvLTfn8a75

    8.2K1.1K163156K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20262.9x their median

    THE BIGGEST IS BACK!! DUDE you have no idea how insane this dick feels, and how good he works with it, i felt it in my belly button, such an intense feeling but also AMAZING. Come check one of my best scenes i ever made. https://t.co/y9yimeE8jY

    6.4K838161153K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.8x their median

    the thickest dick I EVER HAD, and boy it felt sooo good!!! You guys asked for a close-up video? here is one with a MASSIVE DICK. That was FUCKING intense the THICKEST dick EVER , fuck it was so heavy! Loved how many loads put in me (7) that night, his dick/balls are so heavy, and definitely left me open. I just can’t stop jerking to this video, you gotta see it too

    6.0K892152101K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.4x their median

    can you take it this deep? This scene was something i got really proud of it LOL , 12 real inches is not a easy one hehehe, come watch me champ this dick all the waaay through @AndresHenri_ https://t.co/EYCdGI8AX9

    5.2K730184123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.2x their median

    THE BIGGEST IS BACK!! DUDE, you have no idea how insane this dick feels, and how good he works with it, i felt it in my belly button, such an intense feeling but also AMAZING. Come check one of my best scenes i ever made. https://t.co/4TgZY6NH9l

    4.8K71316370K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    Love myself a very thick dick opening me up😈 @so_much_adam https://t.co/rfRBhhS5p2

    2.2K2440087K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    BOY WHAT WAS THAT !!!??? @luandantt what have you done with me ? LOL those insane anal orgams are def worth you load 🫣😈🀭😏 https://t.co/PgAQnTS9qB

    1.8K1802243K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.5K interactions against 241K followers, an engagement rate of 1.03%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 77K times each, and 3.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 32.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 100K interactions, about 40x its own typical post.

What is Gabriel Hung's engagement rate on X?
Gabriel Hung (@hungucbrazilian) has an engagement rate of 1.03%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 240,823 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.03%, Gabriel Hung sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @hungucbrazilian have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @hungucbrazilian post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going