Back to @beniaminmincu's profile

Beniamin Mincu |๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ/acc engagement report

@beniaminmincu - 370K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.272%
of 370K followers
Per impression
0.989%
102K views on a typical post
Reach
27.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
30 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.07/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 370K followers, an engagement rate of 0.272%. Posts are seen about 102K times each, and 0.989% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.272%, Beniamin Mincu |๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ/acc sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 995 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 30, 2026

    A Bet We Made in 2018 This is me and Vitalik in 2018. ETH Devcon. We were at a table talking about sharding and how blockchains could actually scale by running execution in parallel. At the time, Ethereum and Elrond had the same thesis. Both believed execution sharding was the path forward. Since then, Ethereum changed direction multiple times. Sharding gave way to rollups. Rollups gave way to "we need to scale L1 again." The roadmap shifted, the promises changed, the technical approach pivoted more than once. And through all of it - the Ethereum community stayed. They gave the team the space to find the right path. They didn't kill the project when the roadmap changed. They believed the builders would figure it out. That patience is what kept Ethereum alive. Not the technology. The community. โ”€โ”€โ”€ We made a different bet. We bet on execution sharding from day one and we never left that path. Adaptive state sharding shipped on mainnet in 2020. Three execution shards plus a metachain. State, network, transactions - all sharded from genesis. Supernova shipped this year. Consensus decoupled from execution. 600ms blocks. achieved 88ms finality. 120,000 TPS burst mode on the same validator hardware. 3,200+ validators on consumer-grade machines. 171,000 commits. #6 in the entire industry. Ahead of Solana, Avalanche, Sui, Polygon, Aptos, and TON. Tier-one infrastructure providers on board, distribution partners like Cointelegraph are running validator nodes. Stripe's Machine Payments Protocol is settling on MultiversX. EGLD is named in an Arizona state strategic reserve bill. The agentic commerce stack - x402, MPP, MX-8004, UCP, ACP, MCP - is live on one chain. xMoney is building regulated stablecoin issuance under MiCA. The infrastructure underneath has never been stronger. โ”€โ”€โ”€ And yet the market prices EGLD like none of this exists. Every blockchain community is going through the same thing right now. EGLD is down. ETH is down. SOL is down. The market doesn't differentiate between chains that shipped paradigm-shifting infrastructure and chains that shipped a landing page. But here's what's different about right now. Bitcoin survived 2014. Ethereum survived 2018. Solana survived 2022. In each case, the community stayed long enough for the technology to matter. In each case, the community that held wrote the next chapter. And in each case, the ones who fractured, who turned on their own builders, who let the loudest voices - the ones who already sold - define the narrative? Those communities don't exist anymore. You don't remember their names. The perception of value has been distorted. By cycles. By speculation. By narratives that reward noise over engineering. And by us - divided when we should be united. Turning on each other instead of building forward together. Look at what's underneath. Not the chart. The infrastructure. 88ms finality. 120K TPS. #6 in developer activity globally. Tier-one infrastructure partners. Stripe settling on-chain. EGLD in US state legislation. Regulated stablecoins under MiCA. An agentic commerce stack that Visa, Coinbase, and Mastercard are racing to replicate. This is not a project searching for relevance. This is a project that shipped the relevance and is waiting for its community to match it. If this fails, it won't be because the technology wasn't good enough. It will be because we weren't united enough to carry it forward. I've been here since 2018. That table with Vitalik. Every pivot, every cycle, every doubt. Still here. Still building. Now it's your turn. Not to believe. To show up.

    87923223034130K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 2026

    https://t.co/rJoZMwDEQP

    86728515756160K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    Years of effort in the making. Supernova. Speed, cost, and user experience, simply redefined. Below the threshold of human perception. Sub-second transaction speeds. Across the planet. Testnet is live! Today, devnet activation marks another critical step. Final stretch in sight. Inches away from the finish line.

    903282752152K viewsView on X
  • Mar 12, 2026

    JUST IN: Cointelegraph is the largest crypto media company in the world. They are now becoming a MultiversX validator. ๐Ÿ”ฅ That's the strongest signal media can send, putting reputation on the line to secure a chain.

    840266491427K viewsView on X
  • Feb 10, 2026

    FRESH OFF THE PRESS: MultiversX Unveils Flagship Multi-Protocol Universal Agentic Commerce Stack ๐Ÿ”ฅ AI agents have now moved from experimentation to economic actors in production. They schedule travel, reconcile invoices, manage inventory, trigger payments, and coordinate workflows with minimal human involvement. Until very recently, the underlying infrastructure has lagged behind. Most payment protocols and blockchain systems were designed around interactive users, manual approvals, and sporadic transactions. Agent-driven systems operate continuously, programmatically, and across multiple environments. They require different assumptions at the protocol level. Over the past months, MultiversX has implemented a set of protocol integrations designed specifically for this mode of operation. Together, they form a complete stack for agentic commerce: discovery, authorization, execution, settlement, and performance.

    737274473651K viewsView on X
  • Apr 3, 2026

    FRESH OFF THE PRESS: EGLD POSITIONED FOR US INSTITUTIONAL ADOPTION ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Arizona Senate Bill 1649 establishes the first Digital Assets Strategic Reserve Fund in the United States, with EGLD named directly in the bill text. The bill introduces an evaluation framework written into law, measuring network strength, development improvements, performance benchmarks. Fourteen assets made the cut. EGLD one of them. This matters far beyond a single state. SB1649 sets a legal precedent for how governments can evaluate and hold digital assets following a deep review of fundamental measurable criteria. The fact that Arizonaโ€™s legislature looked at the data and included MultiversX technology alongside Bitcoin and other assets speaks volumes to what the team has been building for years: real infrastructure, real usage, real resilience. If this passes the full House vote, Arizona becomes the first US state to hold a diversified crypto reserve, and EGLD is eligible from day one. Institutional frameworks are being built around networks and assets enabling a robust and resilient foundation to build on for the future. A great example of long efforts from people who care, builders and entrepreneurs from around the world, showing up, and finding new ways to bring contributions to the ecosystem. cc @DigitalGoldTalk Public source: https://t.co/SOWV5DSCiM

    794233531334K viewsView on X
  • Feb 13, 2026

    UNFOLDING LIVE: MultiversX Introduces Universal Identity and Trust Layer for Agentic Systems via MX-8004 ๐Ÿ”ฅ The 8004 standard is coming to MultiversX. It is our implementation of the ERC-8004 Trustless Agents standard and introduces a native identity and registry layer for autonomous systems. Soulbound agent identities. Onchain job validation with oracle verification. Reputation scoring anchored in verified work. Deterministic cross-contract reads tying it all together. The contracts are deployed. The code is public. The Explorer is indexing it. This is the universal trust layer for agents, on MultiversX. https://t.co/tmeKzkeu87

    727247622959K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 2026

    xPortal has been punching above its weight. Over the past 3โ€“6 months, we've taken substantial steps to quietly rebuild the foundations of xPortal. Placing it firmly at the frontier of finance, better equipped to serve its users. The shipping velocity has increased, and some of the most demanded and awaited features have come live, being tested by users all around the world. From pre-IPO equities and perpetuals, to outcome markets, and the newest onchain ecosystems where new liquidity is forming. With step after step, xPortal has transformed from a much loved crypto superapp, to a secure and fun window into the larger world of global finance. In some sense, this has been the direction of xPortal from day 1. The destination didn't change much. It just took years to get here. Now, over the next few months, that initial vision is ready to reach its natural conclusion. Becoming the default home screen for your money. IBANs. Gold Cards. Premium subscriptions. A complete money experience, designed with the simplicity, love and craftsmanship you've come to experience. The world has changed. In many ways. And our focus has sharpened with it. Engines are warming up. A phased activation competition is ready to begin. A new xPortal experience is around the corner.

    708198621862K viewsView on X
  • Mar 23, 2026

    Supernova is the sonic boom of blockchain interaction. But in what way, precisely? Well, a sonic boom happens when an object outruns its own sound. There's no warning or no build-up. The thing just arrives before the sound it makes can catch up. With Supernova, the transaction lands before the user even registers they're waiting. The experience outruns the expectation. And creates a perception boom. Every architectural bet we made over the past five years points here. Right at this moment. The phase of instantaneous interaction has arrived.

    701204531731K viewsView on X
  • Apr 22, 2026

    100+ security issues. Identified. Neutralized. AI in its current form is a nuclear force. Channeled right, it delivers pure, unadulterated, unmatched, productivity gains. Channeled wrong, it ships weapons, with attack vectors the world has never had to defend against. The next chapter will be defined by this duality: breathtaking productivity unlocks, colliding with deep, surgical, systemic attacks unlike anything we've seen. For any blockchain team, any open-source team, security is THE PRIORITY. The MultiversX team has been operating around the clock. Nights. Weekends. Relentless. Methodically filtering, triaging, and eliminating, in record time, a long list of material issues and protocol-level improvements. Every fix is another layer of hardening ahead of Supernova. To put things in perspective: in the last few months, we've surfaced and closed more issues than in the previous 3 - 4 years combined. This is the preparation phase. And the fact that AI has crossed a new capability threshold cannot be overstated. Supernova is not an upgrade. It is a complete rewrite of what a blockchain can be, instant performance, radical scalability, human UX that actually feels seamless, and just works. It also opens a new verifiable agentic highway. Real. Live. Working today. Continuously adaptive security will define the AI eraโ€”and almost no one is treating it that way. Static firewalls defended the old internet. Continuously adaptive security is what defines survival in the AI era. Our engineering team, along with a resourceful network of builders, validators, and community members, is doing the surgical, disciplined, vital work that shapes what comes next. This is MultiversX. This is SUPERNOVA.

    630175351656K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 370K followers, an engagement rate of 0.272%. Posts are seen about 102K times each, and 0.989% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Beniamin Mincu |๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ/acc's engagement rate on X?
Beniamin Mincu |๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ/acc (@beniaminmincu) has an engagement rate of 0.272%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 370,309 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.272%, Beniamin Mincu |๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ/acc sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @beniaminmincu have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @beniaminmincu post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

Beniamin Mincu |๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ/acc (@beniaminmincu) Engagement Rate - 0.272% | PlayerSells