Arturo Villa engagement report
@arturovilla - 77K followers on X
Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 45 interactions against 77K followers, an engagement rate of 0.059%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.6K times each, and 0.807% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 22% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.0K interactions, about 200x its own typical post.
Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Arturo Villa's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.059%, Arturo Villa sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.5% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 65% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 17% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 65% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 264 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 9, 2026200x their median
Lo que se lee en los documentos desclasificados hoy es esto: El 29 de julio, el CNI informó a la Delegación del Gobierno en Ceuta de que estaba circulando una convocatoria en dos grupos de Facebook para entrar a la ciudad de forma irregular durante la semana de la Fiesta del Trono. Y añadió que estos grupos sumaban “un total de 180.000 seguidores” para que sus interlocutores se hiciesen “a la idea del alcance de la difusión.” La existencia de esta campaña era conocida por otras instituciones y estaba siendo monitoreada, pero en modo alguno constituía o podía interpretarse como un indicador de la escala, naturaleza o probabilidad de lo que pasó después. De hecho, ni siquiera el CNI lo hizo. Prueba de su prudencia es que este organismo se limitó a trasladar esa información por mensaje y breve llamada telefónica al Gabinete de la Delegación del Gobierno de Ceuta y a la UCE-3 de la Guardia Civil y no emitió ninguna alerta mayor a su cadena de mando de la Fuerzas Armadas, la Policía Nacional o el Ministerio de Defensa. Esto es comprensible porque, con la información que existía entonces, nadie podía anticipar la crisis migratoria que se produjo los días 30 y 31. Ningún organismo competente lo hizo. Ni en España, ni en la UE. Lo que sí hicieron el Gobierno y los trabajadores públicos fue actuar en cuanto se materializó la amenaza, movilizando todos los recursos disponibles. Y seguiremos haciéndolo hasta que Ceuta recupere la normalidad y tenga la prosperidad que merece. https://t.co/gWSDho2DHd
- Sep 9, 202672x their median
Poco se habla de que han excluido a Cataluña del informe PISA porque el 23,33% del alumnado quedó excluido. Pero si desglosas los motivos es aún más lamentable. El 83,42% de los excluidos fue por discapacidad cognitiva, emocional o conductual. El 15,57% por no saber la lengua. https://t.co/rOGUXJcLMZ
- Sep 9, 202634x their median
Los estudiantes nativos españoles de la Comunidad de Madrid han obtenido 493 puntos en PISA 2025. Con esa puntuación estarían prácticamente en el top 10 mundial, por delante de Suiza, Polonia, EEUU o Finlandia. Quizá lo que nos hunde es la inmigración y el socialismo. Quizá. https://t.co/fFbLcMdwom
- Sep 9, 202616x their median
España ha sacado 464 puntos en PISA: la prensa titula -con razón- "desastre", "catástrofe", "caída histórica". Pero si desglosas PISA entre nativos españoles e inmigrantes, los nativos españoles obtienen 474 puntos. Es decir, los nativos españoles han obtenido mejor puntuación en PISA que la media nacional de Alemania, Suecia, Países Bajos, Dinamarca, Portugal, Francia, Eslovaquia, Hungría, Eslovenia, Croacia, Luxemburgo, Noruega, Letonia, Islandia, Malta, Grecia, Albania, Montenegro, Serbia, Rumanía, Bulgaria y Chipre. ¿A que ese titular no lo van a dar los grandes medios de comunicación?
- Sep 9, 202611x their median
Le he pedido a GPT-6 Astra que desglose los resultados del Informe PISA 2025 por CCAAs, tanto media general, como nativos e inmigrantes por separado. Y la -abrumadora- diferencia entre españoles nativos e inmigrantes por cada Comunidad Autónoma. Aquí tenéis los resultados. https://t.co/1xvcPYG7p1
- Sep 9, 202611x their median
El único país de Europa donde los inmigrantes sacan mucha mejor puntuación PISA que los locales es Montenegro. Porque los “inmigrantes” allí son serbios xd https://t.co/KbRhsv13wE
- Sep 9, 20266.0x their median
Diferencia entre españoles nativos e inmigrantes en el Informe PISA 2025. Mapa según CCAAs. La diferencia es abrumadora. Hasta de 67,7 puntos. https://t.co/gnNmjcRmtm
- Sep 9, 20262.2x their median
Pues mola más de lo que me esperaba. https://t.co/vkpIRukBaV
- Sep 9, 20261.9x their median
Flipo. Esta tía es la "obispa" de Oslo. Es vegetariana y hace rituales de yoga. Tremendo lo del luteranismo. https://t.co/MZQRu6QY6A
- Sep 8, 20261.8x their median
Qué barbaridad. El mundo va a cambiar mucho en muy poco tiempo. Pero no os hacéis ni siquiera una idea de cuanto. https://t.co/NSqi1KYunm
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 45 interactions against 77K followers, an engagement rate of 0.059%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.6K times each, and 0.807% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 22% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.0K interactions, about 200x its own typical post.
- What is Arturo Villa's engagement rate on X?
- Arturo Villa (@arturovilla) has an engagement rate of 0.059%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 76,531 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.059%, Arturo Villa sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @arturovilla have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @arturovilla post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.33 posts per day across the measured window.