Back to @arturovilla's profile

Arturo Villa engagement report

@arturovilla - 77K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.059%
of 77K followers
Per impression
0.807%
5.6K views on a typical post
Reach
7.29%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
45
interactions (median)
Saved
0.054%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.33/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 45 interactions against 77K followers, an engagement rate of 0.059%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.6K times each, and 0.807% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 22% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.0K interactions, about 200x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Arturo Villa's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.059%, Arturo Villa sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video65% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 65% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 264 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 2026200x their median

    Lo que se lee en los documentos desclasificados hoy es esto:   El 29 de julio, el CNI informó a la Delegación del Gobierno en Ceuta de que estaba circulando una convocatoria en dos grupos de Facebook para entrar a la ciudad de forma irregular durante la semana de la Fiesta del Trono. Y añadió que estos grupos sumaban “un total de 180.000 seguidores” para que sus interlocutores se hiciesen “a la idea del alcance de la difusión.”   La existencia de esta campaña era conocida por otras instituciones y estaba siendo monitoreada, pero en modo alguno constituía o podía interpretarse como un indicador de la escala, naturaleza o probabilidad de lo que pasó después.   De hecho, ni siquiera el CNI lo hizo. Prueba de su prudencia es que este organismo se limitó a trasladar esa información por mensaje y breve llamada telefónica al Gabinete de la Delegación del Gobierno de Ceuta y a la UCE-3 de la Guardia Civil y no emitió ninguna alerta mayor a su cadena de mando de la Fuerzas Armadas, la Policía Nacional o el Ministerio de Defensa.   Esto es comprensible porque, con la información que existía entonces, nadie podía anticipar la crisis migratoria que se produjo los días 30 y 31. Ningún organismo competente lo hizo. Ni en España, ni en la UE. Lo que sí hicieron el Gobierno y los trabajadores públicos fue actuar en cuanto se materializó la amenaza, movilizando todos los recursos disponibles. Y seguiremos haciéndolo hasta que Ceuta recupere la normalidad y tenga la prosperidad que merece. https://t.co/gWSDho2DHd

    4.1K1.3K3.1K534937K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202672x their median

    Poco se habla de que han excluido a Cataluña del informe PISA porque el 23,33% del alumnado quedó excluido. Pero si desglosas los motivos es aún más lamentable. El 83,42% de los excluidos fue por discapacidad cognitiva, emocional o conductual. El 15,57% por no saber la lengua. https://t.co/rOGUXJcLMZ

    2.5K726282570K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202634x their median

    Los estudiantes nativos españoles de la Comunidad de Madrid han obtenido 493 puntos en PISA 2025. Con esa puntuación estarían prácticamente en el top 10 mundial, por delante de Suiza, Polonia, EEUU o Finlandia. Quizá lo que nos hunde es la inmigración y el socialismo. Quizá. https://t.co/fFbLcMdwom

    1.3K25715428K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202616x their median

    España ha sacado 464 puntos en PISA: la prensa titula -con razón- "desastre", "catástrofe", "caída histórica". Pero si desglosas PISA entre nativos españoles e inmigrantes, los nativos españoles obtienen 474 puntos. Es decir, los nativos españoles han obtenido mejor puntuación en PISA que la media nacional de Alemania, Suecia, Países Bajos, Dinamarca, Portugal, Francia, Eslovaquia, Hungría, Eslovenia, Croacia, Luxemburgo, Noruega, Letonia, Islandia, Malta, Grecia, Albania, Montenegro, Serbia, Rumanía, Bulgaria y Chipre. ¿A que ese titular no lo van a dar los grandes medios de comunicación?

    52614264821K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202611x their median

    Le he pedido a GPT-6 Astra que desglose los resultados del Informe PISA 2025 por CCAAs, tanto media general, como nativos e inmigrantes por separado. Y la -abrumadora- diferencia entre españoles nativos e inmigrantes por cada Comunidad Autónoma. Aquí tenéis los resultados. https://t.co/1xvcPYG7p1

    37210722927K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202611x their median

    El único país de Europa donde los inmigrantes sacan mucha mejor puntuación PISA que los locales es Montenegro. Porque los “inmigrantes” allí son serbios xd https://t.co/KbRhsv13wE

    42465606.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20266.0x their median

    Diferencia entre españoles nativos e inmigrantes en el Informe PISA 2025. Mapa según CCAAs. La diferencia es abrumadora. Hasta de 67,7 puntos. https://t.co/gnNmjcRmtm

    19755978.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.2x their median

    Pues mola más de lo que me esperaba. https://t.co/vkpIRukBaV

    8756212K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20261.9x their median

    Flipo. Esta tía es la "obispa" de Oslo. Es vegetariana y hace rituales de yoga. Tremendo lo del luteranismo. https://t.co/MZQRu6QY6A

    6661021.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.8x their median

    Qué barbaridad. El mundo va a cambiar mucho en muy poco tiempo. Pero no os hacéis ni siquiera una idea de cuanto. https://t.co/NSqi1KYunm

    6181106.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 45 interactions against 77K followers, an engagement rate of 0.059%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.6K times each, and 0.807% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 22% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.0K interactions, about 200x its own typical post.

What is Arturo Villa's engagement rate on X?
Arturo Villa (@arturovilla) has an engagement rate of 0.059%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 76,531 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.059%, Arturo Villa sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @arturovilla have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @arturovilla post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going