Back to @aliktareen's profile

Ali Khan Tareen engagement report

@aliktareen - 491K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.066%
of 491K followers
Per impression
0.62%
53K views on a typical post
Reach
10.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
326
interactions (median)
Saved
0.03%
16 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.83/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 326 interactions against 491K followers, an engagement rate of 0.066%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 53K times each, and 0.62% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 61% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.1K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fomo, #goat, #grc.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026. Recurring tags: #fomo, #goat, #grc.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ali Khan Tareen's engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 38% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.066%, Ali Khan Tareen sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video61% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link18% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 61% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 416 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 202612x their median

    meri jooti khaaye overnight oats https://t.co/B46kkPl34F

    3.7K2286752248K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20267.8x their median

    Pakistan’s Test side has never been poorer in the professional era of the last half-century, writes @scyldberry 🔗:https://t.co/qyCUlyd1k5 https://t.co/PdXpzEIM7Z

    1.8K374177222465K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20267.4x their median

    Caitlin Clark now has more career games with 30+ PTS and 10+ ASTS than every other player in WNBA history has combined 😳 https://t.co/eFGogd15by

    2.0K321584689K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20265.4x their median

    This may land me in hot water but I owe an honest assessment to Pakistan cricket. I was a fan before I was a stakeholder. Things I’ve observed from my playing days + actively being involved with the PSL, dressing room and PCB leadership: - The players may or may not be comfortable. A. Late nights and junk food are common. Now I understand living on hotel food and being stuck for 6 weeks is tough, but the word “professional” has to mean something. B. No one wants to do the tough yards. It’s a mentality thing. Like for instance a few times in the test match after a long spell the pace bowlers didn’t run after the ball. What are you saving your legs for? The test match ended in 2.5 days… C. Compare the test match pace and white ball pace of seamers. They are so scared of being injured and losing their T20 gigs. You have to train to bowl fast to be able to bowl fast. And fast bowling is painful. - The journalists may or may not be cancerous tumour A. The growth of Sports Journalism was great as it brought us closer to the team, inner workings, selection and the injustices around Pakistan cricket but like any other avenue in our country, the bad eggs took over and they also corrupted the good eggs. B. Journalists all pushing their own agendas, And they build narratives on who they like / who caters for them more I.e these things may or may not be leaks , gifts, favours. Most if not all may or may not be comprised. C. They may or may not be loyal to Pakistan. It’s only about their views, content, income. D. They may or may not be the scummiest of all stakeholders. - Former players may or may not be too comfortable. A. Barring a few who actually worked and got their coaching badges and qualifications most find it more comfortable to go on tv and just iterate the problems. No one presents the solutions nor goes out there and gets the experience / qualifications to contribute. They all may or may not want things on a platter , without doing the hard yards to become better coaches / tacticians , the same hard work that actually made them so good at cricket in the first place - job first, Pakistan later A. The board is too bureaucratic. Everyone fears to speak their mind because they worry about backlash and their jobs. There are people that genuinely wanted to help , but when they see their efforts go no where they stop trying and just settle for their paycheck. B. The chairman is not the problem. The reliance for decision making in the board on the role may be but in this case other avenues and roles the current chair he’s shown his leadership skills, it’s solely cricket where the results cannot be seen. Why is that? In my experience a good leader needs good advisors. - PSL owners are not incentivised to grow the teams A. 10 year lease, you grow the brand, only to give it back to the PCB. So why would you grow if you see none of the benefit? Only the bills. B. You invest in players and talent hunts only to lose them due to retention rules and category changes that are agenda driven. The language may or may not have been altered for legal purposes. Pakistan cricket will always be in my heart. Pray for us to go back to being the best. Not just good or competitive, but the best.

    1.4K22610042193K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20265.3x their median

    Just because things are bad does not mean they can't get worse, writes Danyal Rasool. https://t.co/zFxa7yG4ri

    1.5K1163478143K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.5x their median

    My question is: Between the 17 players originally selected, then the new 7. Where are Shaheen and Naseem?🤔

    991261011250K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.7x their median

    I remember a time where our cricket used to be so strong that fans would think the only reason we lost was because players purposely underperformed for some extra 💵 #takemeback

    8323714665K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.3x their median

    Sazgar has been one of the shinning stars of the stock market. Leading the EV boom in cars. Who is going to lead the EV bike boom? Thats the stock I want to invest in. Also battery manufacturers. 👀

    63520761056K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.2x their median

    Sky sports😂🔥 https://t.co/6aNYn60UIC

    6278475218K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.6x their median

    Random but: the Lahore Airport is the shittiest airport in the country. Its like someone thought hmm, how can we make each process worse than before. Et voila! Allama Iqbal Intl Airport.

    416386219154K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fomo#goat#grc#pcb#silverlining

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 326 interactions against 491K followers, an engagement rate of 0.066%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 53K times each, and 0.62% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 61% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.1K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fomo, #goat, #grc.

What is Ali Khan Tareen's engagement rate on X?
Ali Khan Tareen (@aliktareen) has an engagement rate of 0.066%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 491,473 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.066%, Ali Khan Tareen sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @aliktareen have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @aliktareen post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going