Back to @acetaminofenmk's profile

acetaminofen mk engagement report

@acetaminofenmk - 93K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.25%
of 93K followers
Per impression
3.18%
7.1K views on a typical post
Reach
7.88%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
227
interactions (median)
Saved
0.098%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 227 interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 0.25%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 3.18% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 113x its own typical post.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

acetaminofen mk's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.25%, acetaminofen mk sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video35% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 35% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 156 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 20, 2026113x their median

    3 sacudidas de esas aguanto...bueno, dos🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/UCK8Cdig5g

    24K8838622977.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026108x their median

    GTA 6 is game of the year already, no need to vote on it. https://t.co/5zlFjfOQBN

    23K958149131562K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202671x their median

    Lo digo en representación de todos los hombres, aflojen a la cirugía compulsiva, a los labios con 100 litros de porquería, a las cejas maquilladas y recortadas con navaja y a las pestañas que parecen un paragolpes. A ningún hombre le calienta de verdad, es una locura entre las mujeres. Dejen de hacerse esto.

    14K1.2K7372272.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202620x their median

    Leí que Salwa Maloof fue escogida como Reina del Carnaval de Barranquilla por su trayectoria (su hermana fue Reina Infantil) y por su «fundación filantrópica». Yo, mal pensada, creí que fue porque su papá es un reconocido excongresista detenido en febrero de 2007 por orden de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, que lo investigaba por sus presuntos nexos con el exjefe paramilitar ‘Jorge 40’, y condenado por concierto para delinquir agravado, organizar grupos armados ilegales, fraude electoral y constreñimiento al elector. Pero la cosa no termina ahí: adivinen quién fue el abogado del hombre de la familia de bien de la ciudad. Sí, el mismo Abelardo Style, alias el presifrente. También, el papá de la reina elegida por su filantropía fue acusado en 2015 de presuntamente haber participado en el asesinato del entonces alcalde de Santo Tomás Nelson Mejía (2004), quien fue asesinado porque se negó a subordinarse a las políticas paramilitares y a entregar los recursos de la salud del municipio a dicho grupo armado. Pero bueno, esa soy yo, que soy una mal pensada. Que viva el carnaval, su reina y las familias poderosas y tradicionales de esta ciudad.

    3.8K7034028102K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20267.4x their median

    Con gorra pero no por calva . https://t.co/uTGaOg4ub5

    1.6K2438112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20266.6x their median

    Así se ve la ansiedad https://t.co/0kGh0Piybo

    1.4K214608.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20266.5x their median

    Los hombres financieramente estables son tan amables y tranquilos; siempre los hombres sin dinero son los groseros e irritables: deben de tener hambre o algo así.

    1.2K1271502962K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20265.6x their median

    A la mujer floja si le gusta estudiar cosmetología y estética 😅

    1.1K94636065K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20265.3x their median

    El sexo sin protección es literalmente confiarle tu vida a alguien 🥲

    1.1K57291663K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.6x their median

    Las rupturas amorosas a los 30 golpean distinto. No es lo mismo que el desamor a los 21. A los 21 lloras, te desahogas con tus amigos, sales, te distraes y, de alguna manera, sanas. Entonces la vida se siente larga, llena de posibilidades y segundas oportunidades. A finales de los veinte o al acercarte a los treinta, se siente diferente. No solo pierdes a una persona: pierdes planes, rutinas y la versión de ti que construía un futuro con ella. Ya no duele solo imaginar que no la volverás a ver. Duele pensar en lo que imaginabas vivir juntos: el viaje que nunca hicieron, la casa que quizá tendrían, las tradiciones, los domingos y esa vida que, aunque aún no existía, ya habías empezado a imaginar. Lo más difícil de una ruptura a esta edad es entender que no solo despides a alguien, sino una parte del futuro que creías tener asegurado.

    47665341221K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 227 interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 0.25%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 3.18% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 113x its own typical post.

What is acetaminofen mk's engagement rate on X?
acetaminofen mk (@acetaminofenmk) has an engagement rate of 0.25%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 92,965 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.25%, acetaminofen mk sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @acetaminofenmk have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @acetaminofenmk post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

acetaminofen mk (@acetaminofenmk) Engagement Rate - 0.25% | PlayerSells