Back to @_Bariea4's profile

‏البَرِيعَة engagement report

@_Bariea4 - 83K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
1.26%
of 83K followers
Per impression
2.43%
43K views on a typical post
Reach
51.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.431%
186 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.7/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 83K followers, an engagement rate of 1.26%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 2.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 51.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 5.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

‏البَرِيعَة's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 67% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.26%, ‏البَرِيعَة sits above the 75th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.499% to 2.09%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 98 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 4, 20265.8x their median

    "مشينا إلى الفخ مبتسمين، لأن المنادي كان عزيزاً ".

    4.9K1.1K3548573K viewsView on X
  • Mar 1, 20254.9x their median

    “امرأة من النوع الذي يظل عالقاً في ذاكرتك حتى لو لم تتحدث بكلمة واحدة إليك.”

    4.3K7195319761K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.6x their median

    "والله إني كنت خير امرأة , في حياة من عرفني، وإن الشر الذي رأوه بي، لم يكن إلا درعاً، ارتديته متأخراً،لأحتمي. "

    3.0K741208112K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20262.0x their median

    "أكثر ما يُدهش في التَّعافي أنّه لا يشبه الانتصار لا مُوسيقى، لا تصفِيق، لا نِهايَة سَعيدة، مُجرّد صباحِ عادي، لا يُؤلمكَ فيه ما كانَ يُؤلمِك بالأمسِ."

    1.6K391141776K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20261.7x their median

    "هناك نوع من الجهاد لا يعرفه الكثير من الناس اسمه جهاد السعادة، هو محاولاتك المستمرة أن تبقى سعيدًا بالرغم من استكلاب البيئة المحيطة بك ".

    1.4K36126960K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20261.6x their median

    "كثيرًا ما يدرك الكريم الخديعة ، لكنه يتغافل عنها ترفعًا ".

    1.3K32015554K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 2026

    «الغُربة ان تطرق باباً كنت تملك مفتاحه ».

    900185211954K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 2026

    "ربّما أجرمتُ عليك بفضيلتي، لأنّك لست أهلًا لها".

    9081684345K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 2026

    "تبدأ لأنك لا تعرف وتنتهي لأنَّكَ فَهمت".

    80618710641K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 2026

    "الإفراط في العطاء لا يخلق أبدا أشَّخاصا مخلصة بل أنانية."

    71111115636K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 83K followers, an engagement rate of 1.26%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 2.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 51.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 5.8x its own typical post.

What is ‏البَرِيعَة's engagement rate on X?
‏البَرِيعَة (@_Bariea4) has an engagement rate of 1.26%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 83,038 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.26%, ‏البَرِيعَة sits above the 75th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @_Bariea4 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @_Bariea4 post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going