盛雪SHENG Xue engagement report
@ShengXue_ca - 246K followers on X
Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 227 interactions against 246K followers, an engagement rate of 0.092%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 1.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #习近平, #盛雪诗歌.
Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026. Recurring tags: #习近平, #盛雪诗歌.
Compared with accounts its own size
盛雪SHENG Xue's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.092%, 盛雪SHENG Xue sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 95% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 14% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 95% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 339 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 1, 20266.9x their median
🔥 又救起来一个！向真正全心全意为人民服务的尼泊尔救灾英雄们致敬🫡 https://t.co/0H8JxvzUba
- Sep 3, 20264.3x their median
每次看到都爆笑🤣 您有没有笑😆…… 写稿子的故意坑习近平吧🤣 #习近平 https://t.co/cKJEzUgiHl
- Feb 18, 20194.2x their median
许多中国人都希望中国强大，强大到再也没有哪个国家敢对中国的事情说三道四…… 这就是国家强大而没有人权和民主的后果…… 中共暴政如此强大，你们都他妈的踏实了😢 https://t.co/CGWM0HCTDh
- Sep 4, 20262.8x their median
伊朗又连夜突袭约旦美军基地, 弹光冲天。中共媒体为此非常兴奋：特朗普这次真摊上事了。 伊朗在经历了美以联军半年的毁灭性打击，还能够发射导弹袭击美军在约旦的基地，同时对约旦直接施压，这说明了一个可怕的事实，伊朗此前已经被中共、俄罗斯装备成了一个有着强大军事实力的神权恐怖主义暴政。 如果不是美国当局和以色列联手果断地开启了这次的打击行动，如果让伊朗掌握了核打击能力，全世界将面临的后果不堪设想。 那些仇视、攻击、污蔑美以联军打击伊朗行动的人，甚至有些人希望美以打击伊朗行动失败的人，是太蠢还是太坏🤔
- Sep 18, 20242.7x their median
哥哥的骨灰在家陪了我们十个多月，今天安葬了哥哥，和我们的父母同住一个墓园，相隔二十米吧。 我的哥哥是像天使一样的人。 哥哥绝对是天资聪敏，五六岁时加减乘除就全是心算。他上中学时，如果数学老师有事不能上课，我哥哥就代替老师上课。 1978年中国举行第一届奥林匹克数学竞赛，有二十多万人竞争，哥哥是全国第十三名。 那次数学竞赛排名在57以内的选手，可以挑选全中国任何大学入读。我哥哥选择了北京大学。 而且他兴趣广泛，才华出众，他写诗、绘画、滑冰、滑雪、游泳、玩桌球、打保龄球，下象棋，下围棋，打牌，他做菜也比我好....他什么都好。 更重要的是，哥哥非常善良仁慈，正直仗义，慷慨大方，而且特别幽默风趣，他的人缘特别好。他的许多朋友是从小一起长大的。 今天，安葬了哥哥🙏💞🌈 碑文还没刻，今天用的是打印的。诗还要继续斟酌🙏。旁边的树也还没种下。我们原想种一棵日本红枫🍁全年是红色的。但日本红枫长不大，又担心树龄不长。也许就加拿大红枫吧🙏 我说，待哥哥转世再来，下一世无论我们是什么关系，我们都永远相亲相爱🙏💞
- Aug 31, 20262.7x their median
🚨 JUST IN: President Trump, flanked by RFK Jr., announces a major HEALTHCARE AFFORDABILITY expansion "A major expansion of one of our signature affordability initiatives, something people have been trying to get for YEARS...that's MOST FAVORED NATION drug pricing!" 👏🏻 https://t.co/OzDpRurgQt
- Aug 28, 20262.7x their median
【独家深度剖析】 盛雪：喜马拉雅的怒吼与极权的封口 ——中尼边境泥石流大惨案背后的“人定胜天”黑幕 前言——看着那蔽日的黑浪从天而降，裹挟着泥石和血肉，呼啸着扫平车辆、道路、楼宇和桥梁，奔涌向远方…… 这两天，我一直在想，这突如其来的毁灭性灾难，难道真的没有征兆、没有警告、没有诱因？就这么瞬间犹如一桶泥汤倾倒在蚂蚁洞旁，抹去了一切有形的物体和鲜活的生命。 一、 灾难突降：惨绝人寰的吞噬与荒谬至极的谎言 2026年8月26日上午，喜马拉雅山脉中尼边境的吉隆沟爆发特大冰崩泥石流。高达数百万立方米的冰碛物与泥石流以每秒近50米的绝望高速倾泻而下，瞬间淹没了人群、漫过了高楼，冲毁了热索桥与吉隆口岸联检大厦。现场视频里，人群如蝼蚁般瞬间不见踪影，成片建筑被吞没，数十辆暑期旅游大巴与货运卡车被卷走。方圆近五公里的核心区域，眨眼间被数百万立方米的泥沙掩埋。 不仅如此，泥石流堵塞上游河道形成临时堰塞湖并发生暴烈溃坝，高浓度的泥沙洪水顺着吉隆藏布，进入尼泊尔后称拉苏瓦河 Rasuwa River，一路狂泻，灾害影响迅速延伸至下游十余公里的尼泊尔拉苏瓦地区，淹没了沿岸数十个村庄、多座在建水电站施工区及交通干线。 这场大惨案导致中尼国际边境大通道全面断绝、电力与通信光缆瞬间瘫痪。随后，中共官方迅速实施严格的信息封锁与无限期交通管制，从吉隆县城至边境口岸数十公里范围内的整条峡谷走廊全部陷入戒严封锁，灾难与维稳辐射方圆数百平方公里。 然而，面对这场惨绝人寰的灾难，中尼两国给出的通报却呈现出极其荒谬与诡异的反差：尼泊尔官方开诚布公，确认寻获近400具遗体，另有800多人失踪，并公开向国际社会求救；而中共官方，却将死亡数字极其荒诞、生硬地定格在——“3人遇难，558人失联”。 二、 施工爆破与砸向临界冰川的重锤 外界与主流媒体几乎都顺着中共官方的说法，认为这又是一场气候变暖引发的自然灾害，是不可抗拒的高位冰崩造成的连锁反应。然而，背后的真相——恰恰是中共坚决拒绝一切国际救援、严禁任何外籍救援队与独立媒体深入现场的真正原因。 1. 喜马拉雅断裂带的脆弱平衡 事发的吉隆沟，恰好位于印度板块与欧亚板块强烈碰撞的核心断裂带上，整个山体的内部应力本就处于极其敏感的临界状态。高海拔地区的巨型冰川与数百万立方米的冰碛物并非悬空独立存在，它们高度依赖下方基岩与山体结构的力学支撑。这里的每一块巨石、每一片冰川，都在极其微妙的地质平衡中悬挂了千万年。 2. 高频地质微震、深层切削与基建工程的重创 吉隆沟正是中共近年来砸下重金、强行推进“一带一路”跨境设施建设的集中区。其中，由山东省属国有企业水发集团投资建设的拉苏瓦·布特科西（Rasuwa Bhote Koshi）水电站（规划装机容量120兆瓦），就紧邻吉隆口岸；国家电网公司推动的跨国500千伏高压输电通道，更需穿过喜马拉雅高海拔断裂带；此外，中共还在海拔3500米至4500米以上的脆弱冰川和山体边缘，大规模推进“边境小康村”与口岸设施的平整建设，进行了成千上万次山体切削、开挖与硬化。 施工部门在极其脆弱的山体上，进行了长达数年高强度的炸山爆破与打洞穿山。这种持续不断的人工高频微震，沿着山体节理面深层传导，日复一日地诱发基岩微裂缝发展；大规模深部开挖更改变了基岩孔隙水压，彻底剥离了高位冰川、冰碛物与附着山体之间的力学支撑。常年不断的高强度施工爆破与山体外科手术，就是那把不断砸向临界冰川的重锤！ 3. 破坏水热平衡与工程诱发失稳 大规模砍伐山体植被、开凿高山施工便道，严重改变了地表辐射吸收与水文循环，加速了山体内部永久冻土层的冻融失稳。加上雅鲁藏布江下游等超级梯级水电战略在整个西藏高原诱发的整体地质应力重组，这种常年秉持“改天换地、人定胜天”的工程暴力，终于在2026年8月26日的这个上午，彻底击碎了喜马拉雅山脉原本脆弱的地质平衡，将积累多年的地质应力推过了崩溃点，引发了这场本质上由“人祸”诱发的毁灭性总爆发。 三、 “一带一路”地缘霸权与不惜忤逆自然的狂妄 官方之所以宁可冒天下之大不韪公开撒谎，死守“死亡3人”的防线，不是偶然的应急反应，而是因为这场灾难可能直接暴露中共不敢示人的三大战略死穴： 1. 军民融合通道与“基建狂魔”神话破灭 吉隆口岸不仅是中尼边贸枢纽，更是中共“国防边防基础设施一体化”战略的极要节点。其高山隧道、重型公路与高压电网的架设，兼具解放军西藏军区对南亚方向快速兵力投送、重型装备部署与战术补给的军民两用（Dual-Use）极高战略价值。 在这种“军民融合”的国家意志下，“政治交工期”凌驾于一切科学规律之上。一旦承认工程安全评估彻底失效、常年高强度的爆破与开挖诱发了高位冰崩，不仅意味着数以千亿计的资金投进了无底洞，更向全人类宣告：中共以“人定胜天”狂妄意志向外输出的“基建狂魔”模式，在严酷的自然法则面前宣告彻底破产。 2. “亚洲水塔”的控制权与跨境水霸权 喜马拉雅山脉被称为“亚洲水塔”。在雅鲁藏布江下游大峡谷区域，中国甚至规划了总装机容量达6000万千瓦，这相当于近3个三峡大坝规模的超级水电开发项目。中共在吉隆藏布、雅鲁藏布江等跨境河流上游的大肆开采与截流，本质上是将其作为获取对下游南亚国家，包括尼泊尔、印度、孟加拉国的水资源地缘政治主导权的“水霸权”载体。这场冰崩泥石流溃坝，瞬间撕下了中共所谓“绿色基建”的伪装，将其对下游生态与生命安全的漠视暴露无遗。 3. 惨烈的人道危机与防范西方渗透 吉隆口岸是印度教徒前往西藏冈仁波齐神山朝圣及欧美游客环喜马拉雅游的必经之路。中共官方在公布的“558人失联”名单中，罕见地包含了来自印度、美国、英国、加拿大、韩国、日本等多国的260名外籍人员，其中包括100多名印度朝圣者和9名韩国工程人员。 承认数百名外籍人员在瞬间被活埋惨死，将立刻引爆全球舆论，西方多国与印度势必要求派遣独立救援队、红十字会及国际媒体深入西藏边境。为了死守西藏边境这一政治与军事禁区，防止国际力量合法进入现场，并极力逃避随之而来的巨额跨国赔偿与国际生态指控，中共才选择用“死亡仅3人”强行制造灾情可控的虚假假象，将所有国际援助拒之门外。 四、 水文黑幕：绝不预警与分期通报死亡 尼泊尔媒体与现场记者已经愤怒爆料，上游中国一侧在溃坝发生前，未向下游发出任何预警，直接导致尼泊尔数十个村庄在毫无防备中被狂暴的泥石流瞬间吞没。这一极其冷酷的现象，彻底暴露了体制官僚与水文地缘战略的终极黑幕： 第一，长期的“水文数据封锁”策略。中共长期以“国家安全”和“水文机密”为由，严格限制向周边国家共享实时、高精度水文与冰川堰塞湖监测数据。这种制度性的封锁，剥夺了下游国家极其宝贵的预警时间，使尼泊尔沿岸村庄完全沦为突发溃坝的“地缘牺牲品”。 第二，“不敢预警”的政治悖论。对官方而言，发出预警就等于主动承认上游重大工程区域存在安全隐患与特大溃坝事故。为了保住官方“工程安全无隐患”的乌纱帽，上游选择了死一般的沉默，用下游数百条鲜活的生命，为上游的政治遮丑买单。 第三，“失联”与“冻结死亡”的文字游戏。将绝大多数被活埋者划入失联，强行把死亡人数生硬冻结在3人，是极其经典的维稳套路。这既能向上呈交一份抢险有力的政绩答卷，又能避免在二十一大前夕引发派系倾轧与政治问责；待数月或数年后舆论热度退去，官方再零星核实确认死亡，化整为零，彻底消解社会的怒火与追责。 五、 真相是泥石流中最先被活埋的牺牲品 这种不顾地质规律、强推工程暴力，并在灾难爆发后严密封锁现场、视生命如草芥的做法，在中共的执政历史上屡见不鲜。 2008年汶川特大地震发生后，外界早已注意到龙门山断裂带不仅是地层结构脆弱区，更是中共常年隐秘兴建山体地下导弹基地与重型军工设施的敏感地带。 当时大量地下工程与工程爆破改变了山体稳定结构，而灾难发生后，官方出于死守军事地质机密的政治考量，同样实施了极其严密的封锁，严格限制外界救援力量与独立媒体深入核心区，导致大量本可获救的生命在废墟下绝望死去。甚至在尸横遍野之际，官方还恬不知耻地喊出大难兴邦的狂妄口号，将人祸与人道灾难强行包装为政权凝聚力与制度优越性的赞歌。 从当年的龙门山到今天的吉隆沟，相同的悲剧一再重演。从人定胜天的政治狂妄，到盲目爆破破坏喜马拉雅的脆弱平衡；从只顾跨国大项目的盛世威严，到灾难爆发后切断预警、封锁信息、将死亡数字强行冻结为三人。 这场中尼边境的特大惨案再次撕下了极权统治的面具。上游的狂妄大建破坏了神山造化，中游的冷酷谎言抹杀了被活埋的数百冤魂，而事后的冷血喊话更暴露了其无视生命的本质。在一个把维稳、军事机密与政绩看得高于一切的体制下，真相永远是爆破声与泥石流中最先被活埋的牺牲品。 2026年8月28日凌晨2点38分 #盛雪智库 #中尼边境泥石流 #一带一路 #吉隆沟灾难 #ChinaNepalBorder #BeltAndRoad
- Sep 1, 20232.4x their median
几十年来，中国大多数学者、闻人、商贾、才子的智慧、心血、精力都放在如何帮助中共搞好改革开放； 海外民主运动阵营大多数人也是如此； 没有理解到中共改革开放做得越好，统治越稳定，暴政维持的时间越长。而中共费尽心机始终就是要绕开政治民主化这一关键的原则。 特别是一些在美国的民运主流人士，老是为中共改革改良游说美国，出谋划策，争取资源。包括为中共争取最惠国待遇，并与人权脱钩；为中共争取WTO入世，为北京奥运叫好......好像中国强大了，自己特有面子。 殊不知，专制暴政的国家强大是政权的强大，是镇压能力的强大。 三十多年的历史事实📷证明 那些努力其实是完善了中共暴政政体， 所以后来，中共在国际上绑架逮捕暗杀，国际社会拿中共没有任何办法..... 看透中共又有行动的王炳章和彭明都被越境绑架回中共监狱，彭明已经牺牲。 #民运历程
- Sep 2, 20262.4x their median
你说中共这样的官员有多少🤔 找不到工作的、看不起病的、交不起房贷的、结不起婚的、养不动父母老人的、宠不起孩子的、交不起学费的、吃不上饭的…………，都应该到这些官员家里去，搜出钱，也算帮习近平反腐……吧。 https://t.co/MzKw3vwzx2
- Sep 4, 20242.3x their median
据说有人在发起请愿，要求加拿大将我驱逐出境。 https://t.co/XZmTtatTf0
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 227 interactions against 246K followers, an engagement rate of 0.092%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 1.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #习近平, #盛雪诗歌.
- What is 盛雪SHENG Xue's engagement rate on X?
- 盛雪SHENG Xue (@ShengXue_ca) has an engagement rate of 0.092%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 246,301 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.092%, 盛雪SHENG Xue sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ShengXue_ca have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ShengXue_ca post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.33 posts per day across the measured window.