Back to @RhMarketingg's profile

Robinhood Marketing engagement report

@RhMarketingg - 333K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.072%
of 333K followers
Per impression
1.85%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
3.88%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
239
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.17/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 239 interactions against 333K followers, an engagement rate of 0.072%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.85% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 66% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 581 interactions, about 2.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026. Recurring tag: #aipin.

Compared with accounts its own size

Robinhood Marketing's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.072%, Robinhood Marketing sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link66% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 66% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 400 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 28, 20262.4x their median

    JUST IN: @Iris_token Launches Limit Orders on Robinhood Chain, trade any token with automated buy & sell limit orders and let IrisApp execute your trade automatically Any token. Any price. Fully on-chain. Launch app: https://t.co/cLY9MtcSEE https://t.co/T8LHxV9ZyX

    488296048.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.3x their median

    VEX has entered the Chronos era. VEX 0.2 Chronos 🟦 biggest upgrade yet, rebuilt for faster execution, longer-running missions, and greater reliability. Chronos moves from intent to execution with fewer wasted steps, keeps long-running missions on track, and remains reliable when providers fail or transaction states become uncertain. Less waiting. Zero broken execution loops. More work completed autonomously. VEX Economy engine. This is VEX at machine speed live on @RobinhoodApp , @solana , @arbitrum and every chain. Now available on Windows, Mac, Linux

    401331091235K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20262.3x their median

    JUST IN: $WOOF is starting to turn heads on Robinhood Chain. This chart is getting harder to ignore. CA: 0xe15db7C8547A0adD11eB26A700246cCa08aEfCe5 Chart: https://t.co/M7LPEDbqYa DYOR. NFA. https://t.co/AVen0mgVjz

    48616409.7K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20262.2x their median

    $FOX is one of the most interesting plays on Robinhood Chain right now. Still flying under the radar, but the setup is there for a strong move as attention continues to shift toward the ecosystem. Early positioning often makes the biggest difference. CA: 0x2103faA9D1762e27a716C61718b3aCf3Ec1F9bf1 Chart: https://t.co/UPLtYFeokH X: @fox_onrh DYOR. NFA.

    46067019.6K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20262.2x their median

    JUST IN: Volume spikes on $YODA as Elon Musk and Robinhood mention it on their X. CA: 0x4c4cddb8138c97B123375Cf65b0456AE877410DA @Yoda_RH https://t.co/BW7lTkx3UQ

    45846306.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.1x their median

    The Agent is going even bluer 🟦 Global liquidity. Tokenized assets All going agentic Coming.

    2811307828.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20262.0x their median

    The trenches on @RobinhoodApp Chain are now agentic. Let your VEX agent scan the trenches 24/7, catch opportunities as they emerge, and move from signal to execution up to 13× faster than manual workflows. Turn your VEX agent into your autonomous trencher, operating within your rules, at machine speed, while you stay in control. Human judgment. Machine speed. Your rules. The trenches are now faster, safer, and agent-native. Update to the latest version of the VEX App and start trenching with VEX agents via @trenchexpressRH 🟦

    3751290651K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20261.9x their median

    Did you know VEX just got another major upgrade in just 1 week? Chronos 0.2.6 is built to make the agent better at what actually matters: Research on-chain opportunities smarter. Run long-lived missions more effectively. Execute more on-chain actions. Recover better when execution gets messy. Plus a major desktop UX upgrade and new protocol integrations. VEX is getting closer to a complete autonomous on-chain operator. Fewer assumptions. More proof. Agentic Capital Market 🟦

    3671478714K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20261.7x their median

    The biggest moves often begin before the market notices. $UNICASH is starting to gain traction on Robinhood Chain, and the chart is showing early signs of momentum. If this trend continues, it could emerge as one of the stronger performers from current levels. CA: 0xfF0A037e3eCD3560B93E6b2163FEa48B81FEeFd1 Chart: https://t.co/DtSQ7Vb8Kh Still early, but definitely one worth keeping on the watchlist. DYOR. NFA.

    3462620138K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20261.6x their median

    $UNICASH has already delivered a strong move, climbing from a $60K market cap to over $315K since the initial call — a 7x gain so far. Momentum is building, and many in the community are now watching to see if the project can continue toward the $1M milestone. If you’re following Robinhood Chain, this is one to keep on your radar. C.A: 0xfF0A037e3eCD3560B93E6b2163FEa48B81FEeFd1 Chart: https://t.co/DtSQ7VaAUJ Always do your own research. NFA.

    3077600256K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#aipin

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 239 interactions against 333K followers, an engagement rate of 0.072%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.85% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 66% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 581 interactions, about 2.4x its own typical post.

What is Robinhood Marketing's engagement rate on X?
Robinhood Marketing (@RhMarketingg) has an engagement rate of 0.072%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 332,503 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.072%, Robinhood Marketing sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RhMarketingg have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RhMarketingg post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going