Back to @ReallyCute456's profile

真的很可爱 (COMM SLOT FULL) engagement report

@ReallyCute456 - 104K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
14.1%
of 104K followers
Per impression
15.2%
96K views on a typical post
Reach
92.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
15K
interactions (median)
Saved
3.70%
3.6K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 15K interactions against 104K followers, an engagement rate of 14.1%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 96K times each, and 15.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 92.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 18% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 110K interactions, about 8.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #aria, #fairy, #zzzero.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026. Recurring tags: #aria, #fairy, #zzzero.

Compared with accounts its own size

真的很可爱 (COMM SLOT FULL)'s engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 14.1%, 真的很可爱 (COMM SLOT FULL) sits above the 90th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.09% to 119.6%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 35 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 1, 20258.3x their median

    🐯 Rawrrr https://t.co/khQVrJ505O

    100K9.8K83181.5M viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 20265.1x their median

    Bra strap https://t.co/u5gbQay0zk

    72K3.2K406566K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20264.3x their median

    blood thirsty cat https://t.co/vgTr29wUaS

    60K4.0K6336606K viewsView on X
  • Mar 11, 20264.2x their median

    myterious drinks from weird gurl #nikkeバレンタイン https://t.co/umbYTevPtk

    58K4.1K5226586K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20264.0x their median

    💙💙💙 https://t.co/PF2glxs4aR

    55K3.3K538453K viewsView on X
  • May 23, 20263.6x their median

    🔴 https://t.co/JUrTEIymnP

    49K3.5K252475K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20263.0x their median

    🤔 part time . https://t.co/0IabdTQhtW

    42K1.8K546404K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.9x their median

    🖤 https://t.co/xev7WUwsm4

    41K2.1K297257K viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 20262.5x their median

    Yuio vapo💙 https://t.co/MG2xKnTZTp

    35K2.0K193370K viewsView on X
  • May 10, 20262.4x their median

    Bell onee-san https://t.co/3deV8TBKGZ

    33K2.7K538348K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#aria#fairy#zzzero

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 15K interactions against 104K followers, an engagement rate of 14.1%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 96K times each, and 15.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 92.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 18% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 110K interactions, about 8.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #aria, #fairy, #zzzero.

What is 真的很可爱 (COMM SLOT FULL)'s engagement rate on X?
真的很可爱 (COMM SLOT FULL) (@ReallyCute456) has an engagement rate of 14.1%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 104,333 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 14.1%, 真的很可爱 (COMM SLOT FULL) sits above the 90th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ReallyCute456 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ReallyCute456 post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going