Back to @MarcelBumX's profile

Marcel Boom 📍Lima 🇵🇪 engagement report

@MarcelBumX - 306K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.038%
of 306K followers
Per impression
1.73%
6.7K views on a typical post
Reach
2.19%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
116
interactions (median)
Saved
0.455%
30 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.83/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 116 interactions against 306K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 6,493 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.7K times each, and 1.73% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 25% are part of a thread and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 148x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Marcel Boom 📍Lima 🇵🇪's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,493 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.038%, Marcel Boom 📍Lima 🇵🇪 sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,864 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,191 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link75% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 75% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 114 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 24, 2023148x their median

    We look so good together 😈 @StarryTwunk @MarcelBumX https://t.co/Yz600gIHLI

    14K3.4K6017949K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202628x their median

    My perfect horny nights are something like this… “POUNDTOWN” 🌃 (20 mins) https://t.co/AtQFpzkuoY

    2.8K44317340K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202616x their median

    Need this again soon 💦 “DIVE IN: PART 1” 🤿 (22 mins) @Hungandanonxxx https://t.co/9qnVkn6gft

    1.6K26012316K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20266.5x their median

    We didn’t plan on filming that night, but after fucking for more than an hour he told me it was too good to not be... See this and more at: https://t.co/NV0GTwtQKd https://t.co/fp5me0nOZ3

    661941013K viewsView on X
  • Nov 10, 20236.0x their median

    Yes daddy, go for it 😮‍💨 “Who’s your daddy?” (50 mins) @TopMonsterCock @MarcelBumX https://t.co/XThQ3YTr8j

    5811064053K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 20235.3x their median

    Conquering Mountains ⛰️ 🔥🔥🔥https://t.co/LqVdp9uHkF https://t.co/o2y9OWHaAb “Cream Galore” (37 mins) @StarryTwunk & @MarcelBumX https://t.co/89ThVsos5M

    565523061K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.5x their median

    Such a powerful tool 🤤 “THANK YOU ZADDY: PART 1” 🔨 (38 mins) https://t.co/aIPfaRaM7J

    354485011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.7x their median

    I just got a new subscriber. Thank you! https://t.co/zCn3Vawgim https://t.co/gJ3sZfVIuS

    28230108.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20261.6x their median

    A new JFF superfan is enjoying my 674 videos, 2228 photos, with 4410 likes. See ALL my content at: https://t.co/zCn3Vawgim https://t.co/ibo1aLKCPI

    16020007.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    POV pounding non-stop 💦 “POUNDTOWN” 🌃(19 mins) https://t.co/zKrHGw7qkG

    11467012K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 116 interactions against 306K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 6,493 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.7K times each, and 1.73% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 25% are part of a thread and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 148x its own typical post.

What is Marcel Boom 📍Lima 🇵🇪's engagement rate on X?
Marcel Boom 📍Lima 🇵🇪 (@MarcelBumX) has an engagement rate of 0.038%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 305,724 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.038%, Marcel Boom 📍Lima 🇵🇪 sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MarcelBumX have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,493 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MarcelBumX post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going