Back to @MMTFinance's profile

MomentumⓂ️Ⓜ️T engagement report

@MMTFinance - 296K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.02%
of 296K followers
Per impression
0.644%
9.3K views on a typical post
Reach
3.12%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
60
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.9/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 296K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.3K times each, and 0.644% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

MomentumⓂ️Ⓜ️T's engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.02%, MomentumⓂ️Ⓜ️T sits above the 25th percentile of the 68,576 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99116.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 68,576 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 55,420 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile116.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video23% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 23% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 84 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 202622x their median

    Momentum is on $BNB chain. 10,000 $MMT going to holders! 🎁 Hold 10+ MMT on BNB chain by 31 August, 23:59 utc. 13 winners, 500 MMT each. Like + rt this post. 10 winners, 100 MMT each. The big prizes are on-chain. We read the holder list, no forms.

    5784512631326K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20266.3x their median

    2,500 $MMT for MMT traders on @Aster_DEX . Trade $MMT (10 USDT or more), hold MMT on $BNB Chain by 31 August 23:59 UTC, then quote this post with a screenshot to enter. 5 winners, 500 $MMT each. More info 👇 https://t.co/JK4C6kYPza

    19269526424K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.7x their median

    Who else is never leaving $SUI?

    2211144312K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.6x their median

    Your crypto can sit, or it can earn. Same assets, different outcome.

    144482209.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.9x their median

    $SUI is the whole mood today.

    152418010K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.6x their median

    $SUI is our happy place

    138812110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.3x their median

    Tell me why you love $SUI ↓

    95437111K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.3x their median

    Staked $SUI shouldn't sit frozen. xSUI earns yield while staying fully usable across DeFi. Staked and liquid at the same time. https://t.co/oQTvgTEpPs

    117119010K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20261.9x their median

    GM MMT fam! ☀️ It's Friday. You made it. 🙌

    7933209.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20261.8x their median

    Gm! ☕️ We’re looking for new mutuals. 👀 Who should Momentum be following? https://t.co/dhT0vVf7xN

    6653606.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 296K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.3K times each, and 0.644% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

What is MomentumⓂ️Ⓜ️T's engagement rate on X?
MomentumⓂ️Ⓜ️T (@MMTFinance) has an engagement rate of 0.02%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 296,483 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.02%, MomentumⓂ️Ⓜ️T sits above the 25th percentile of the 68,576 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MMTFinance have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MMTFinance post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going