Back to @KyberNetwork's profile

Kyber Network engagement report

@KyberNetwork - 291K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.013%
of 291K followers
Per impression
0.51%
7.6K views on a typical post
Reach
2.63%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
39
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.63/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 39 interactions against 291K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.6K times each, and 0.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 59% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 532 interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #agi, #alt, #basecat.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026. Recurring tags: #agi, #alt, #basecat.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kyber Network's engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, Kyber Network sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video85% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link59% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 59% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 254 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 202614x their median

    Here’s the test for bulls πŸ‚ If you could only back one thesis or hidden gem this cycle, what would it be? (The narrative, the alpha, the insight, or the conviction behind it - anything that you love to share). Reply or quote it πŸ‘‡ 3 most engaged takes + 2 random get 200 KNC each. The rewards are just for the fun. It’s your insight that counts.

    2151011526433K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20264.2x their median

    We've worked with @KyberNetwork to enable trading through their router, which powers many dApps across the ecosystem behind the scenes. Sells work today, and buys will work out of the gate when external buys are enabled on August 4th.

    1241127328K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.6x their median

    Coinbase tokenized stocks now earn cashback on KyberSwap. 20,000 USDC in total rewards. Epoch 1 is live with GOOGLc, NVDAc, AAPLc, and METAc on @base. Read full details: https://t.co/hyInG85RPt https://t.co/IzNItHz2Ot

    681913111K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.5x their median

    πŸ”₯ August is here, and we’re switching things up! The new phase has been live with 3,000 KNC rewards & 23 winners! This month, the Invite Contest will have 2 rounds, giving you more chances to win! ⏰ Round 1 ends: 18 Aug, 8:00 AM UTC. Round 2 starts right after. You only need to invite 10 new frens to enter the draw. Haven’t hit 10 yet? There’s still time - start inviting now! πŸ‘‰ Join Discord for all details: https://t.co/7sYh2OVu1F Don’t miss your Round 1 lucky shot!

    63111849.7K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20262.2x their median

    We’re excited to announce that RobinScan is now integrated into KyberSwap for Robinhood Chain transaction exploration. Through this integration, users on KyberSwap can open their Robinhood Chain transactions directly on RobinScan, making it easier to explore transaction details and onchain activity across the network. KyberSwap brings its multichain trading and smart order-routing infrastructure, while RobinScan provides a fast, dedicated explorer and data layer built specifically for Robinhood Chain. This is the first step in a deeper integration, with both teams exploring new ways to make trading and onchain exploration even more seamless across the ecosystem. More to come 🀝@KyberNetwork

    56722111K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20262.0x their median

    Liquidity pools on Robinhood Chain are now accessible on KyberEarn. Discover, add, and manage them all in one place: β€’ Access all Uniswap and FairFlow pools β€’ Provide liquidity seamlessly and instantly with any token using Zap β€’ Analyze performance and track position fees/rewards in one dashboard Explore pools with APRs up to four digits: https://t.co/nyBuC6CEFz

    50101548.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20261.7x their median

    JUST IN: KyberSwap flips to #1 by 24h volume on @RobinhoodCrypto. Almost $1B routed since launch. https://t.co/yMoNtViYYC

    4949416K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20261.6x their median

    This is what onchain looks like when it's all in one place πŸ“ KyberSwap ┃ β”£πŸ“ Trade ┃ β”£πŸ“ /swap ┃ β”£πŸ“ /limit-order ┃ β”—πŸ“ /cross-chain-swap ┃ β”£πŸ“ Earn ┃ β”£πŸ“ /fairflow ┃ β”£πŸ“ /zap ┃ β”—πŸ“ /smart-exit ┃ β”£πŸ“ Developer ┃ β”£πŸ“ /aggregator-api ┃ β”£πŸ“ /limit-order-api ┃ β”—πŸ“ /zaas-api ┃ β”£πŸ“ AI Agent Hub ┃ β”£πŸ“ /skills ┃ β”—πŸ“ /mcp-server

    4936311K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Getting into the trenches is easier when it's all in one tab. Trade @ponsdotfamily, @virtuals_io, and @flapdotsh tokens with the best experience. πŸ‘‰ https://t.co/NGZZ5KrpbF https://t.co/jRdLWjFjVV

    3951128.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    Trending tokens can now be sorted by market cap on KyberSwap. Big cap or small cap, spot what's moving in seconds. #VIRTUAL @virtuals_io #CASHCAT @cashcat_token #STONKBROKER @ClutchMarkets #PIPEDOG @pipedog_ #PONS @ponsdotfamily #BNKR @bankrbot #HMM @thinkingcatRH πŸ‘‰ Explore more tokens: https://t.co/V8Haoll7ai

    454526.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#agi#alt#basecat#biscotti#blink

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 39 interactions against 291K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.6K times each, and 0.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 59% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 532 interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #agi, #alt, #basecat.

What is Kyber Network's engagement rate on X?
Kyber Network (@KyberNetwork) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 290,548 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, Kyber Network sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @KyberNetwork have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @KyberNetwork post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going