Jeremy engagement report
@Jeremybtc - 284K followers on X
Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 441 interactions against 284K followers, an engagement rate of 0.155%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 3.95% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 29x its own typical post.
Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Jeremy's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 84% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.155%, Jeremy sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 120.0% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 88% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 4% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 163 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Mar 9, 201629x their median
I wonder how many people will have fallen in love with an AI chatbot by 2026.
- Sep 6, 202615x their median
After decades of policies that sold out American workers, President Trump is bringing jobs back to America, and the country BUILDING AGAIN. 🇺🇸 https://t.co/puXpZXVG2m
- Sep 4, 20265.1x their median
Just watched this dude turn $40 into over $87k on @MetaWin The crazy part is he’s also about to get airdropped part of the $1M they have going out this month Everyone who deposits on https://t.co/HbCETlb5bG qualifies Comment your wallet, I’ll give one of you another $250 so you can go play & qualify as well
- Sep 5, 20264.7x their median
Solana is for the poors
- Sep 4, 20261.9x their median
2002: “damn, look at those graphics” 2026: “damn, look at those graphics” https://t.co/SF1teOxkmm
- Sep 5, 20261.9x their median
ROBINHOOD TOKENS ARE COMPLETELY DOMINATING EVERYTHING RIGHT NOW Could this really be the new memecoin chain? https://t.co/SUY2TLbJzP
- Sep 5, 20261.9x their median
Waking up to $PONS hitting $900 MILLION market cap is fucking insane BILLIONS CODED https://t.co/C5qdZ3a0N0
- Sep 4, 20261.9x their median
WTF DID I JUST WAKE UP TO?? $MEME paired with $AMC went from 0 to $150M market cap overnight 🤯🤯 https://t.co/mXpLXAR13U
- Sep 3, 20261.7x their median
Thank you Elon https://t.co/Cf5fQKTzyA
- Sep 4, 20261.7x their median
Please stop sending me your CV’s I don’t want it anymore https://t.co/o5i9c3qhxd
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 441 interactions against 284K followers, an engagement rate of 0.155%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 3.95% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 29x its own typical post.
- What is Jeremy's engagement rate on X?
- Jeremy (@Jeremybtc) has an engagement rate of 0.155%, based on the median interactions across 51 original posts from the last 30 days against 284,333 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.155%, Jeremy sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Jeremybtc have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Jeremybtc post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.