Back to @JeIIy's profile

Jelly engagement report

@JeIIy - 323K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.007%
of 323K followers
Per impression
0.591%
3.6K views on a typical post
Reach
1.13%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
22
interactions (median)
Saved
0.083%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.13/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 323K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 0.591% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 147K interactions, about 6670x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gta6, #gta5.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #gta6, #gta5.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jelly's engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, Jelly sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 61 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 20266670x their median

    That's just how it goes https://t.co/m6geyF4tSc

    141K5.5K2451142.2M viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 20264928x their median

    MrBeast was genuinely IMPRESSED when YouTuber Jelly kept a perfect poker face while eating the world’s HOTTEST chip, convincing Mindy McKnight it wasn’t spicy and getting her eliminated from a chance to win $1M 😲🔥👀 https://t.co/GEjEPRCCRc

    107K1.1K233338.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202635x their median

    GTA 6 Leaks are a bit sad to watch tbh. Rockstar go get them!

    62219120438K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 202622x their median

    Looks like I'm moving to New Zealand to play GTA 6 12 hours early

    454914142K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 202620x their median

    GTA 6 LOOKS SO GOOD @RockstarGames YOU COOKED 🔥 https://t.co/bs4aLKxswf

    403198017K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202614x their median

    Life is like a video game.. 🎮 I can't wait for GTA 6.. #gta6 https://t.co/7AQB36p8Lo

    292129023K viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 202611x their median

    Thumbnail designers please @ me :)

    1365110118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20264.0x their median

    Why is there a POLE in their LIVING ROOM 👀#gta6 https://t.co/JGpDFfTAEA

    755719.9K viewsView on X
  • Apr 28, 20263.3x their median

    Looking for content creators to join our new GTA 5 FiveM server: RUSH RP 👀 We’re giving creators special in-server perks/tools to help make more unique and higher quality GTA content 🎥🔥 If you’re interested REPLY BELOW #GTA5 #FiveM #GTARP

    57115012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.4x their median

    I Watched EVERY GTA 6 Video So You Don’t Have To, EVERYTHING we know about GTA 6, in one video #gta6 https://t.co/jtboghukJL https://t.co/FI4LKGwOxV

    465205.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#gta6#gta5

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 323K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 0.591% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 147K interactions, about 6670x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gta6, #gta5.

What is Jelly's engagement rate on X?
Jelly (@JeIIy) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 322,816 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, Jelly sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JeIIy have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JeIIy post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going