Back to @JamesonCamp's profile

James Camp πŸ› ,πŸ›  engagement report

@JamesonCamp - 95K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.343%
of 95K followers
Per impression
0.749%
43K views on a typical post
Reach
45.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
325
interactions (median)
Saved
0.237%
103 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 325 interactions against 95K followers, an engagement rate of 0.343%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 0.749% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 45.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 63x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

James Camp πŸ› ,πŸ› 's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.343%, James Camp πŸ› ,πŸ›  sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video43% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 43% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 375 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 12, 202663x their median

    Gear acquisition syndrome, and how buying (or posting) the thing gives our brain a similar sensation to actually doing it. We must resist https://t.co/LvoCevrWcr

    18K2.2K1402712.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202624x their median

    Stripe has finalized an agreement to acquire OpenRouter for more than $7 billion, according to a report from Bloomberg. This is more than five times the $1.3 billion valuation from OpenRouter's funding round just 82 days ago. https://t.co/sju16xjSyB

    6.9K4672923011.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202611x their median

    Seriously saying goodbye to Claude and all other anthropic products The pushing back, the lazy work, the overly wordy replies - I’m over it all

    3.4K8023924175K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202610.0x their median

    No one is ready for the Robotics bull run. https://t.co/xf9zORVyxD

    2.9K2139953326K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20265.4x their median

    One of my neighbors drives an old ford bronco The other drives a brand new G wagon Guess which one I always see with a new stunning woman on their arm https://t.co/ZpsU8ZcMH2

    1.6K141098222K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20264.8x their median

    Angel invest, they said https://t.co/n1Thbjdjyx

    1.4K91337302K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20264.6x their median

    GrokBot came out a week ago at $200 They dropped it to $100 Skip both. Sign up for Cursor Pro+ at $60/month. You get Grok access included. Save yourself $480 a year. You're welcome.

    1.4K40846129K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.4x their median

    $6,500 for a business class seat from Barcelona to LA At 6'2, 11 hours in economy is a nightmare. I refuse to pay that, and couldn't find a flight with miles. But I knew there was a better way. My friend @martinmartinmro gave me early access to https://t.co/utj3xOmxSB I sent them one message (you just text it). 15 minutes later they came back with a business class seat on KLM for 30k miles more than my premium economy booking. Then they changed my ticket for me. That part alone was worth it. No digging through point(.)me. No Amex portal. No bouncing between 10 platforms. No sitting on hold with a call center overseas trying to change a ticket. Using it again to book a trip to London in October. If you travel more than a few times a year, stop doing this yourself.

    1.3K241125610K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20264.3x their median

    indie hacking was a mistake https://t.co/j9OT9tnJoH

    1.2K3011943221K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20263.0x their median

    childhood feels long cuz everything is new, so your brain records everything. adulthood feels fast cuz routine says there’s nothing here worth saving. so in essence as you grow older, you’re doing faster & faster.

    87129741070K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 325 interactions against 95K followers, an engagement rate of 0.343%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 0.749% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 45.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 63x its own typical post.

What is James Camp πŸ› ,πŸ› 's engagement rate on X?
James Camp πŸ› ,πŸ›  (@JamesonCamp) has an engagement rate of 0.343%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 95,034 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.343%, James Camp πŸ› ,πŸ›  sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JamesonCamp have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JamesonCamp post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going