Back to @GoodLawProject's profile

Good Law Project engagement report

@GoodLawProject - 292K followers on X

Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.07%
of 292K followers
Per impression
2.02%
10K views on a typical post
Reach
3.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
203
interactions (median)
Saved
0.04%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.83/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 203 interactions against 292K followers, an engagement rate of 0.07%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 2.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video and 98% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.1K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Good Law Project's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.07%, Good Law Project sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video17% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link98% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 17% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 98% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 190 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 15, 202625x their median

    Dr Arday’s tragic death was the direct, foreseeable result of press harrassment with racism playing a key role. We're asking the prime minister to commission a public inquiry so a tragic death like Dr Arday's doesn't happen again. https://t.co/fGZZTjUYZG https://t.co/pCzBVye4nE

    1.4K4733.0K213843K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202620x their median

    Almost 150,000 people have demanded a public inquiry into Jason Arday's tragic death. Join them 👇 https://t.co/LYQFBJovPO

    1.7K6091.6K74129K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202610x their median

    “Reform should try telling nurses fainting on shifts, farmers losing their crops and people running from burning homes to enjoy the hot weather and see what reaction they’ll get.” https://t.co/FMqUqtfyZ5

    1.4K4981931426K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20267.6x their median

    ☢️ We’re trapped in a toxic contract: Water companies are spilling sewage into our lakes, rivers and beaches and hiking up OUR bills to pay for it It's a scandal. Find out how much you're paying for pollution 👇 https://t.co/PGRsAe1ljN

    983540161021K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20266.7x their median

    Well, that byelection was a total waste of time and money 🙄 https://t.co/PNzUmq668M

    9842381281842K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20266.5x their median

    Instead of keeping hate and misinformation off our airwaves, Ofcom is allowing TalkTV to serve as a megaphone for dangerous, far-right rhetoric. We can’t let this stand, so we're suing Ofcom👇 https://t.co/nu9ZSgGEQg

    7323671981718K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20266.2x their median

    “There is no doubt at all that this was a racist attack on a working class black man.” We're taking action – ask the PM to commission an immediate public inquiry: https://t.co/fGZZTjUYZG https://t.co/IoG2aXojJY

    86335904540K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20266.0x their median

    Stand with Cambridge students demanding accountability for the death of Professor Jason Arday. We're supporting them in their call for Professor Deborah Prentice to resign -- the first step towards justice for Professor Arday. Add your signature👇 https://t.co/UAABDbcQFx

    7032852172245K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20264.9x their median

    Water companies are still spilling sewage and hiking up our bills. And we're paying for it. Find out just how much of your money is funding 💩 💩 https://t.co/Ef9LIpsowb

    613358161010K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20264.8x their median

    We cannot let this story fall to the way-side. We need urgent press regulation. Sign the open letter for a public inquiry into Jason's death. Repost and tag friends in the comments. ⬇️ Add your name ⬇️ https://t.co/fGZZTjUYZG https://t.co/mGEqWV06Si

    4692822121521K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 203 interactions against 292K followers, an engagement rate of 0.07%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 2.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video and 98% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.1K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

What is Good Law Project's engagement rate on X?
Good Law Project (@GoodLawProject) has an engagement rate of 0.07%, based on the median interactions across 53 original posts from the last 30 days against 291,747 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.07%, Good Law Project sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GoodLawProject have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GoodLawProject post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going