Back to @FaZeBloo's profile

Bloo engagement report

@FaZeBloo - 465K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.09%
of 465K followers
Per impression
1.83%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
4.96%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
421
interactions (median)
Saved
0.039%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 421 interactions against 465K followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 1.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video and 14% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 249K interactions, about 591x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mw4, #codnext. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #mw4, #codnext.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.09%, Bloo sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,829 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99118.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,829 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,240 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile118.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video71% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 82 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 12, 2023591x their median

    A 23 year old sculpted this. What's your excuse? https://t.co/yc24hOiGtq

    153K13K13K69K660M viewsView on X
  • Jun 8, 2025105x their median

    Embrace the madness 🦋 #XboxShowcase | #BlackOps7 https://t.co/mfLID1zVAS

    30K5.0K6.7K2.5K7.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 202675x their median

    The Call of Duty: Black Ops and Black Ops 2 ports on PlayStation have more players online than Black Ops 7 does combined on all platforms, sources say https://t.co/ptJQYYZNiz

    29K1.5K4883012.3M viewsView on X
  • Dec 29, 202517x their median

    Rip FaZe Clan. I can still remember when we were the best gaming team. Greed ruins everything

    7.0K191934306K viewsView on X
  • Apr 27, 202420x their median

    no longer a part of @FaZeClan countless memories over the last decade. so many clips, so many videos, and much more love than ever expected. onto the next chapter

    5.8K20633956754K viewsView on X
  • Apr 30, 202411x their median

    Here’s a few of my best clips from my time in FaZe ❤️ Did I miss any? https://t.co/gOyOSfIEDZ

    3.3K24116431282K viewsView on X
  • Jan 20, 20268.5x their median

    🚨 BO7 Ranked Play is confirmed to be releasing on Feb. 5th at the launch Season 2 https://t.co/yRJjEEU1cp

    3.3K1189150771K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20263.6x their median

    FIRST CLIP on BO2 (2026)!!! We’re so back 😭 https://t.co/HigYbr5LVf

    1.4K53462219K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20253.5x their median

    Battlefield is not the “cod killer” btw

    1.2K5720226203K viewsView on X
  • Mar 14, 20263.3x their median

    if CoD ever released a SIMPLE remaster with online support for the “old games” (WaW, Mw2, Bo1, MW3, Bo2) Fans would be happy. Stockholders too. But they will never do it 🫩

    1.3K6360756K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#mw4#codnext

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 421 interactions against 465K followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 1.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video and 14% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 249K interactions, about 591x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mw4, #codnext. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Bloo's engagement rate on X?
Bloo (@FaZeBloo) has an engagement rate of 0.09%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 464,690 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.09%, Bloo sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,829 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FaZeBloo have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @FaZeBloo post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going