Back to @Explosm's profile

Cyanide & Happiness engagement report

@Explosm - 242K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.21%
of 242K followers
Per impression
5.72%
8.9K views on a typical post
Reach
3.67%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
507
interactions (median)
Saved
0.113%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.1/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 507 interactions against 242K followers, an engagement rate of 0.21%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.9K times each, and 5.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.4K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cyanide & Happiness's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 90% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.21%, Cyanide & Happiness sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 98 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 202616x their median

    Frogettaboutit https://t.co/tLv9L2XNDl

    8.1K2857559K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202612x their median

    Daddy 🫦 https://t.co/8qJzEVzFGK

    6.1K15910750K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202611x their median

    Not the sharpest crayon in the drawer https://t.co/79TSjyrsDA

    5.5K1126252K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20268.8x their median

    Anyone else see Spiderman last weekend? https://t.co/gZiBImfSY6

    4.3K12611134K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20267.2x their median

    Were you even listening, Chuck?! 😡 https://t.co/oQqovAaRsG

    3.5K15710327K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20265.4x their median

    Send a pic of yourself with this tattoo and win a free thumbs up https://t.co/fJwUTlAhxN

    2.7K5812135K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20265.4x their median

    For ffs https://t.co/a6H7NqdTzQ

    2.5K15932641K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264.1x their median

    Don't worry, they'll kill that guy so it doesn't cut into oil profits https://t.co/F4CqeeBihK

    2.0K947141K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20263.7x their median

    Aw it's just like real addiction recovery! https://t.co/hyB8aNWsSq

    1.8K584218K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.7x their median

    Unfriendly reminder that this exists https://t.co/rHlAsWnRc6

    1.8K628421K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 507 interactions against 242K followers, an engagement rate of 0.21%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.9K times each, and 5.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.4K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

What is Cyanide & Happiness's engagement rate on X?
Cyanide & Happiness (@Explosm) has an engagement rate of 0.21%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 241,804 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.21%, Cyanide & Happiness sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Explosm have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Explosm post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going