Back to @Demotivateur's profile

Demotivateur engagement report

@Demotivateur - 78K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 78K followers
Per impression
0%
932 views on a typical post
Reach
1.19%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 78K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 932 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 18% carry an image or video and 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3 interactions.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Demotivateur's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, Demotivateur sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video18% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link83% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 18% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 83% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 266 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 2026

    « Un animal ne mérite pas d'être abandonné » : un chat de 8 ans retrouvé enfermé dans un sac au bord d'une route https://t.co/S5PKHfx275

    21001.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    L’un des jeux les plus attendus de l’histoire va enfin bientôt devenir une réalité. Et cette fois, Rockstar ne semble pas vouloir simplement nous offrir une carte plus grande ou des graphismes plus impressionnants. Le véritable objectif serait de donner vie à cette ville jusque dans ses moindres détails. Parce que dans GTA 6, le monde ne devrait plus avoir l’air de fonctionner uniquement lorsque le joueur intervient. Les personnages que vous croiserez auront leurs propres comportements, leurs propres réactions et pourront répondre différemment à ce qui se passe autour d’eux. Une situation provoquée par le joueur pourra donc entraîner des réactions totalement différentes selon les personnes présentes. Et c’est justement cette impression que le monde continue d’exister sans vous qui pourrait changer complètement l’expérience. Même les éléments auxquels on ne prête habituellement aucune attention ont été travaillés. Sous l’eau, les poissons se déplacent de manière indépendante. Dans le ciel, les oiseaux participent eux aussi à cette impression de monde vivant. Chaque détail semble avoir été pensé pour éviter cette sensation de décor figé que l’on retrouve parfois dans les jeux en monde ouvert. Après plus d’une décennie depuis la sortie de GTA 5, Rockstar Games s’apprête donc à nous faire découvrir ce qui pourrait être l’un des mondes ouverts les plus ambitieux jamais créés !

    20001.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    100 km à vélo : 14 femmes en rémission d'un cancer du sein se lancent dans un défi d'exception https://t.co/y2sQgqy63O

    11001.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    Avant même que l’homme ne construise, la nature avait déjà imaginé des formes incroyablement efficaces. Une fleur, une coquille, une pomme de pin, une aile ou encore la structure d’un nid peuvent sembler simples au premier regard. Pourtant, derrière ces formes se cachent des millions d’années d’adaptation et d’ingéniosité. C’est justement ce qui fascine les architectes : observer la nature pour comprendre comment elle fonctionne, puis s’en inspirer pour imaginer autrement. C’est le principe de la biomimétique. L’objectif n’est pas nécessairement de reproduire exactement une forme naturelle, mais de reprendre certains de ses principes : légèreté, résistance, ventilation, optimisation de l’espace ou adaptation à l’environnement. Ainsi, certaines constructions évoquent une fleur, une vague, une coquille ou même une structure végétale. Parfois, cette ressemblance est volontaire. D’autres fois, elle apparaît simplement parce que l’architecture et la nature ont trouvé des solutions visuellement ou structurellement similaires. Après tout, la nature expérimente depuis des millions d’années.

    2000627 viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    SpaceX va construire une base spatiale de 100 milliards de dollars en Louisiane : 10 pas de tir, 3 000 emplois et un premier décollage en 2029 https://t.co/VzQ2OVLNYH

    0010519 viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    Le ZEvent bat son record de dons et récolte près de 33 millions d'euros qui seront reversés à 22 associations https://t.co/fsFhORlHo0

    1000605 viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    Elles achètent deux tiny houses identiques de 30 m² et les garent côte à côte : 64 000 euros chacune et 405 euros de loyer par mois https://t.co/TKFNzETJod

    10001.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    On ne regarde plus jamais les objets du quotidien de la même manière après avoir découvert son travail. Dudi Ben Simon s’amuse à créer des illusions avec ce qu’il trouve autour de lui. Il ne transforme pas réellement les objets : il les place simplement au bon endroit pour qu’une scène banale devienne complètement différente. Une paire de chaussures, un fruit, une fermeture éclair ou encore un simple accessoire peuvent ainsi prendre l’apparence d’autre chose. Le résultat est souvent tellement bien pensé qu’il faut parfois quelques secondes pour comprendre ce que l’on est réellement en train de regarder. Et c’est justement ce qui rend ses créations fascinantes : notre cerveau interprète d’abord l’image de la manière la plus évidente… avant de réaliser qu’un détail vient complètement changer la scène. Avec très peu d’éléments, Dudi Ben Simon arrive donc à créer des images pleines d’humour et de surprises. Son travail montre surtout qu’il n’est pas nécessaire de chercher très loin pour trouver de l’inspiration. Il suffit parfois de regarder un objet complètement banal… et d’imaginer ce qu’il pourrait devenir dans un autre contexte. Images : @dudibensimon

    0100791 viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    Noté 4,3 sur 5 sur Allociné, ce chef-d'oeuvre absolu est le film français préféré de Stephen King https://t.co/fOccFHMmMB

    10001.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    Prix d'une Greffe de Cheveux en Turquie : les 10 Meilleures Cliniques en 2026 https://t.co/IFsxbG0ERt

    000053 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 78K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 932 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 18% carry an image or video and 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3 interactions.

What is Demotivateur's engagement rate on X?
Demotivateur (@Demotivateur) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 78,491 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, Demotivateur sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Demotivateur have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Demotivateur post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going