DeSmog engagement report
@DeSmog - 80K followers on X
Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 80K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 19% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 702 times each, and 1.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.882% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 93% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 73 interactions, about 7.3x its own typical post.
Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
DeSmog's engagement rate beats 19% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.013%, DeSmog sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 40% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 93% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 40% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 93% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 224 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 2, 20267.3x their median
🔴 NEW - Oil Lobbyists, Anti-Abortion Groups, and Tech Giants Flock to Reform Conference Nigel Farage’s party is welcoming polluting interests and radical pressure groups to its annual gathering. https://t.co/hj8xuDq9h5
- Jul 30, 20264.1x their median
In 1966, a British scientist warned Shell that burning fossil fuels was likely causing climate change. Shell's response? Keep it secret—then fund climate denial instead. Read DeSmog's new investigation here: https://t.co/tVPOepHMkm
- Jul 28, 20263.4x their median
🔴 NEW - Meet the Aristocrats Helping to Fund Reform Nigel Farage’s donors include Mayfair club owners, fox hunt masters, and the landed gentry. https://t.co/9qwW1BYolS
- Jul 30, 20263.2x their median
60 years ago, Shell was warned that burning fossil fuels were likely driving global warming. It buried the warning. Now it’s key evidence in a landmark lawsuit looking to hold Shell accountable for the devastation of a climate-fueled typhoon. Here's what you need to know. https://t.co/bP9ze86j0o
- Jul 16, 20263.1x their median
Data centers are on track to produce nearly 400 million metric tons (one Australia's worth) of planet-heating pollution a year by 2030 — unless Big Tech invests in renewables instead of gas-fired power to fuel the AI juggernaut. https://t.co/ztb8HPQs2U
- Jun 25, 20262.9x their median
Honored to be participating in @DeSmog 20th anniversary event on July 8🎂. I'll be joining @NaomiAKlein & Jim Hoggan in a discussion of DeSmog's legacy of two decades of speaking truth to power and pushing back on climate deniers and climate denial: https://t.co/eJMvHP1SpO
- Jul 30, 20262.5x their median
In 1966, a British scientist warned Shell that burning fossil fuels was likely causing climate change. Shell's response? Keep it secret for 60 years—then fund climate denial instead. Read DeSmog's new investigation here: https://t.co/tVPOepHMkm
- Jul 21, 20262.4x their median
❗️ NEW: Albertans already pay the highest electricity costs in Canada. AI data centres are set to drive them up further. https://t.co/ZpBgIJCows https://t.co/S7TuJzD7Eg
- Jul 15, 20262.4x their median
Did you know U.S.'s conservative power broker Leonard Leo got a $1.6 billion gift to back right-wing anti-climate groups? Now he's influencing Europe. Read DeSmog's latest. https://t.co/ajOGGMNRyV #GeoffDembicki #FederalistSociety https://t.co/wGcRkuusp6
- Jul 10, 20262.2x their median
🚨New🚨 A 17-year veteran of Exxon will be joining the Justice Department team that's suing states over lawsuits and laws that hold fossil fuel companies — including Exxon — accountable for climate change. What could go wrong? https://t.co/6R0fhJxPgz
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 80K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 19% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 702 times each, and 1.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.882% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 93% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 73 interactions, about 7.3x its own typical post.
- What is DeSmog's engagement rate on X?
- DeSmog (@DeSmog) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 79,598 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.013%, DeSmog sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @DeSmog have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 19% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @DeSmog post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.