Back to @ChloeeMaeXOXO's profile

Chloee Mae engagement report

@ChloeeMaeXOXO - 342K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.385%
of 342K followers
Per impression
2.23%
59K views on a typical post
Reach
17.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.242%
143 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.47/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 342K followers, an engagement rate of 0.385%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 2.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 5% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Chloee Mae's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.385%, Chloee Mae sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 150 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 29, 202121x their median

    This is hubby’s rough draft of our “sizzle reel” https://t.co/h6Vq1JsfPv

    25K3.4K20457View on X
  • Aug 18, 202616x their median

    In response to a Reddit question, here’s a few clips of me going from 0-60, these all were meeting to playing in under a minute. Sometimes with no introduction at all. https://t.co/VbxEnasVkD

    20K1.5K789334K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20269.5x their median

    Attending my first proper rave/edm festival at Elements this year. To celebrate hubby put together a little tribute to the swingers raves we’ve been to 😘 https://t.co/QxNaTYfsur

    12K543292322K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20268.6x their median

    Found a perfect TT Trend to “improve” 😂 https://t.co/3iTrh94wsV

    10.0K1.2K6316201K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20268.1x their median

    Get you a man that will hold your hand while you get folded 😘 https://t.co/MrUJlIEsbc

    9.9K741316291K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20267.2x their median

    So it’s hubby’s birthday. Here’s a few of hubby’s favorite clips of just the two of us 🥰 https://t.co/CD1xUrd08s

    8.9K538291166K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20266.1x their median

    Some highlights from Ink. And by highlights I mean mostly stuff I can’t share on insta 🤣 With an appearance from @KasieKThePAWG https://t.co/bghHY7knjN

    7.8K239220223K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20264.9x their median

    Hey! Figured with a new Spider-Man movie out better jump on the bandwagon and bring this back 🤣 https://t.co/793ep8Gsm2

    5.9K491194136K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20264.7x their median

    It’s new video day but I felt this one deserved a show the lead up style video. The chemistry I have with @TheLion0412 is just incredible. Also, cherish this because it’s one of the only full nude videos I’ve ever done 😂 https://t.co/S8fUDHE9K3

    5.8K339230173K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20264.5x their median

    It’s new video day. And since it’s a comically out of season St. Paddy’s day video, hubby decided to make a festive preview 😂🍀 https://t.co/YdbqrhlKWR

    5.5K386142166K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 342K followers, an engagement rate of 0.385%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 2.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 5% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

What is Chloee Mae's engagement rate on X?
Chloee Mae (@ChloeeMaeXOXO) has an engagement rate of 0.385%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 342,361 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.385%, Chloee Mae sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ChloeeMaeXOXO have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ChloeeMaeXOXO post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going