Back to @Cherif_MZ's profile

Chérif Mahamat Zene engagement report

@Cherif_MZ - 89K followers on X

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.129%
of 89K followers
Per impression
1.32%
8.7K views on a typical post
Reach
9.78%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
115
interactions (median)
Saved
0.023%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.27/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 115 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0.129%. Posts are seen about 8.7K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 213K interactions, about 1853x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #chine, #tchad. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #chine, #tchad.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.129%, Chérif Mahamat Zene sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,864 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,191 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 423 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 25, 20251853x their median

    Please explain it to me like I’m 5 years old…. https://t.co/RVgh4GbtmS

    186K11K13K2.8K51M viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 2026495x their median

    Nigeria alone had 4 million more births than the entire EU last year! https://t.co/CuQ3B8YHks

    37K8.0K9.1K2.7K7.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 2026119x their median

    No mamen, este es al que eligieron de presidente de Colombia. 🤔 https://t.co/run7b6X8pW

    8.8K3.8K753382458K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 202691x their median

    🟥🇺🇲🇸🇬Un jour, la CIA tenta de recruter le chef des services de sécurité intérieure de Singapour. L’agent américain chargé de l’opération fut arrêté sur-le-champ. À Washington, la panique fut immédiate. Pour étouffer l’affaire, un émissaire de haut rang fut dépêché en urgence à Singapour. Dans la plus grande discrétion, il proposa à Lee Kuan Yew 3,3 millions de dollars afin d’acheter le silence. Lee Kuan Yew refusa net. Froidement, il formula une contre-proposition qui claqua comme un rappel à l’ordre : Singapour n’avait pas besoin de pots-de-vin, mais de 33 millions de dollars d’aide économique. Cinq ans plus tard, il décida de rendre l’affaire publique. Le Département d’État américain nia aussitôt. C’est là que l’offense devint double. D’abord parce qu’ils avaient cru que les dirigeants de Singapour étaient à vendre. Ensuite, parce qu’en niant les faits, ils traitaient Lee Kuan Yew de menteur. Alors, il convoqua la presse et posa un ultimatum sans détour : si les États-Unis persistaient dans le déni, les documents et les enregistrements seraient rendus publics. Quelques heures plus tard, Washington recula. Le Département d’État reconnut intégralement la véracité de sa version. Cette histoire rappelle une vérité trop souvent oubliée : la souveraineté d’un pays ne se mesure pas à sa taille, mais au caractère de ceux qui le dirigent. Quand un État se respecte, même les empires finissent par reculer.’🇺🇲🟥🇸🇬

    7.4K2.6K170212326K viewsView on X
  • Nov 27, 202559x their median

    🎙️« Sarkozy a fait en sorte que le pays le plus riche d’Afrique soit aujourd’hui un terrain de jeu pour djihadistes ; il a ouvert une autoroute pour migrants avec la Méditerranée (…) et tout cela est le résultat de cet abruti, de ce crétin de Bernard-Henri Lévy qui l’a conseillé. » @AndreaKotarac sur TVL🔻https://t.co/EAHGxpKHSg

    4.8K1.8K12659168K viewsView on X
  • Nov 30, 202549x their median

    Renowned economist Jeffrey Sachs reveals why Africa is the next superpower. https://t.co/D7c1S9saa2

    3.8K1.7K6790112K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 202621x their median

    La trahison est un trait de caractère intemporel. https://t.co/QTJ1jAoZ0q

    1.9K464391535K viewsView on X
  • May 23, 202620x their median

    Ousmane Sonko de retour chez lui, porté par une marée humaine de patriotes. Une image incroyable qui résume tout. PASTEF n’est plus un simple parti… PASTEF, c’est le Sénégal. 🇸🇳 https://t.co/9LJadikFS0

    1.9K343111032K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 202618x their median

    Dans son livre « La Médiocratie » (Système de la médiocrité), le philosophe canadien Alain Deneault écrit : « Les médiocres ont remporté la bataille de notre époque. Le temps de la vérité et des valeurs a changé. Les médiocres se sont emparés de tout, avec leur médiocrité et leur corruption. Lorsque les valeurs et les principes élevés disparaissent, une corruption programmée des goûts, des mœurs et des valeurs remonte à la surface. C'est l'ère de la décadence. » « Plus une personne s'enfonce dans la vulgarité, la superficialité et l'abaissement, plus elle gagne en popularité et en notoriété. » Alain Deneault ajoute : « Les réseaux sociaux ont largement contribué à promouvoir la médiocrité. Ils permettent à une belle personne dénuée de profondeur ou à un individu séduisant mais vide de contenu de s'imposer auprès du public, grâce à diverses plateformes médiatiques, dont beaucoup sont superficielles et peu productives, incapables d'offrir un contenu porteur de valeurs susceptibles de résister à l'épreuve du temps. »

    1.3K602496765K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 201114x their median

    Leaders who refuse to listen will eventually be surrounded by people who have nothing significant to say.

    3981.1K2145View on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#chine#tchad

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 115 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0.129%. Posts are seen about 8.7K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 213K interactions, about 1853x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #chine, #tchad. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Chérif Mahamat Zene's engagement rate on X?
Chérif Mahamat Zene (@Cherif_MZ) has an engagement rate of 0.129%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 89,417 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.129%, Chérif Mahamat Zene sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Cherif_MZ have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Cherif_MZ post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going