Byzantine General engagement report
@ByzGeneral - 244K followers on X
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 212 interactions against 244K followers, an engagement rate of 0.087%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.2K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Byzantine General's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 54% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.087%, Byzantine General sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,829 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 118.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 70% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 6% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 70% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 196 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 1, 202625x their median
Do you know what this pattern is called? It's called the "we're gonna chop you up until you give up and then we're gonna send it again, fuck you" pattern. https://t.co/LslOURyuKm
- Sep 9, 202615x their median
Either these AI bros know that there's a real chance that AI is a threat to humanity in which case they're subhuman scum, or they're lying about a potential global genocide to get their investors excited about how powerful their AI is in which case they're subhuman scum.
- Aug 30, 20265.1x their median
he said this at the stone cold bottom btw https://t.co/zLFYv1TUwV
- Aug 30, 20265.1x their median
NEW: @RobinhoodCrypto CHAIN FLIPS @ethereum AND @HyperliquidX IN 24H APP REVENUE - @base HAS GONE MISSING FROM TOP 5 SOURCE: https://t.co/4h276GRKdN https://t.co/jTxJ5V67sw
- Aug 30, 20263.7x their median
I think that a lot of people are waiting for the local lows to be taken out, but we got a fat hidden bull div with below baseline funding. It's very much possible that bitcoin:native leaves everyone sidelined. https://t.co/3Y7BVIybB4
- Sep 7, 20263.7x their median
Damn we really bullied an exchange into delisting a coin before it even got listed.
- Sep 9, 20263.1x their median
$ETH trying to break $2550 for the 8th time, unreal. You can see in real time how the market is sidelined and doesn't have the patience to wait for lower to buy in. https://t.co/kimk4EfHYC
- Sep 7, 20262.7x their median
This is crazy. How many more times can bears defend this level on $ETH? https://t.co/gXwh9GVia5
- Sep 4, 20262.4x their median
The crazy thing about this is that after this pump funding actually went down... Open interest remains elevated and the liquidations tape is revealing something 👀 $BTC https://t.co/c7e5HpspH3
- Aug 31, 20262.2x their median
The Fed turned hawkish and Trump is threatening to re-start the war and bitcoin:native is... Up 1% in past 7D. I'm not saying anything, I'm just observing something.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 212 interactions against 244K followers, an engagement rate of 0.087%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.2K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.
- What is Byzantine General's engagement rate on X?
- Byzantine General (@ByzGeneral) has an engagement rate of 0.087%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 243,538 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.087%, Byzantine General sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,829 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ByzGeneral have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ByzGeneral post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.