The Brookings Institution engagement report
@BrookingsInst - 450K followers on X
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 450K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.7K times each, and 0.209% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26 interactions, about 2.2x its own typical post.
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
The Brookings Institution's engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.003%, The Brookings Institution sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.5% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 100% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 265 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 21, 20262.2x their median
New Beijing Brief: Recorded on the ground in Taipei, @ryanl_hass and @jonczin talk with @ProfTalmadge about Taiwan's defense strategy, its tech sector, and where Washington's read on the threat falls short. https://t.co/6yEtGlt5uK
- Aug 11, 20262.1x their median
German industry is losing roughly 10,000 jobs a month as a new wave of Chinese exports reshapes European markets. Constanze Stelzenmüller and Kari Heerman join Ryan Hass and Jonathan Czin on The Beijing Brief to unpack what's driving "China Shock 2.0"—and what Europe can do about it. https://t.co/zeJhyebo3r
- Aug 27, 20261.9x their median
What does a stronger European role in NATO mean for the U.S.? Michael O’Hanlon explores how greater European defense capacity could strengthen alliance burden-sharing, reinforce deterrence, and continue delivering significant strategic value for the United States. https://t.co/hzpzhWw74J
- Jul 23, 20261.9x their median
Will China replace America on the world stage? On the latest episode of The Beijing Brief, Kagan joins Ryan Hass and Jon Czin to unpack what a receding U.S. role in the world could mean for China's ambitions. https://t.co/F7Mcnrlt62
- Aug 17, 20261.8x their median
Is the U.S. becoming a "petrostate" and China an "electrostate"? Scott M. Moore argues the dichotomy is overstated, but warns China's dominance in EVs and clean tech could still give it a lasting edge as global demand shifts. https://t.co/051WaAm2gU
- Jun 19, 20261.8x their median
Tensions at key maritime chokepoints—from the Strait of Hormuz to the Black and Red seas—are straining U.S. naval capacity and exposing deeper structural shifts in global trade and geopolitics. Peter Dombrowski and Bruce Jones on the limits of American sea power. https://t.co/3opTQM8J3N
- Jun 8, 20261.8x their median
Where are AI-exposed workers concentrated, and how do they vote? New research from Mark Muro, Todd Jones, and Shriya Methkupally maps the political geography of AI exposure ahead of the midterms. https://t.co/sxP89BUEDu
- Jun 10, 20261.7x their median
Pope Leo XIV's first encyclical makes a pointed claim: AI is not "inherently evil"—but it's also "never neutral." Nicol Turner Lee, Elham Tabassi, and Valerie Wirtschafter dig into what a 42,000-word Vatican document means for AI governance, digital equity, and the tech industry's moral accountability. https://t.co/qR0m4SfToN
- Aug 28, 20261.6x their median
"The Iran war’s greatest risk for U.S.-Africa relations is the strategic distraction that hands competitors a window to deepen their foothold on the continent," writes @LandrySigne. https://t.co/WTzQQAhUzj
- Jul 31, 20261.6x their median
Morocco's run to the 2026 World Cup quarterfinals reflects two decades of investment in youth football and infrastructure. For Foresight Africa, Landry Signé talks with Morocco's U.S. ambassador about what's next as the country co-hosts 2030. https://t.co/D06s5s9DQO
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 450K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.7K times each, and 0.209% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26 interactions, about 2.2x its own typical post.
- What is The Brookings Institution's engagement rate on X?
- The Brookings Institution (@BrookingsInst) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 449,689 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.003%, The Brookings Institution sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @BrookingsInst have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @BrookingsInst post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.6 posts per day across the measured window.