Molly Pitcher engagement report
@AmericanMama - 82K followers on X
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 187 interactions against 82K followers, an engagement rate of 0.23%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 66x its own typical post.
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Molly Pitcher's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.23%, Molly Pitcher sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 120.0% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 931 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 4, 202666x their median
Not all heroes wear capes. God bless that man!! https://t.co/RrBBx7ko1x
- Sep 3, 20264.2x their median
Massachusetts doesn’t have the death penalty, but that’s exactly what she deserves. https://t.co/KUkNfMLRNV
- Sep 4, 20262.7x their median
🍜 The Campbell’s Co. has cut 13% of its salaried workforce, roughly 515 employees, amid declining sales 🧐 Campbell’s also recently closed two snack facilities and plans to increase prices on roughly 60% of its products https://t.co/9q8eOsuUaI
- Sep 4, 2026
If Lindsay Clancy were a known MAGA supporter, would she still have the same support and cult following from liberal women? https://t.co/XPrL7t4By4
- Sep 4, 2026
A mistrial has been declared in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial after seven days of jury deliberations. The Massachusetts jury told the judge for a third time Friday morning that it could not reach a unanimous decision. The mistrial came after a dramatic dispute over an apparent lone holdout juror. Clancy’s attorney, Kevin Reddington, had asked Judge William Sullivan to remove the juror, arguing that the juror was not properly applying the court’s instructions on reasonable doubt. Sullivan refused. Clancy did not deny killing her three young children, Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, in their Duxbury home in 2023. Her defense argued that she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and was not criminally responsible for the killings. Prosecutors maintained that Clancy knew what she was doing and understood that her actions were wrong. After weeks of testimony and roughly 38 hours of deliberations, the jury could not agree. The mistrial does not end the case. Prosecutors can choose to try Clancy again. See the link to the article in the comments.👇
- Sep 4, 2026
I hope this man stays safe. May God protect him. 🙏 https://t.co/gIVtQj055u
- Aug 22, 2026
Judges at Every Level Are Undermining Trump’s America First Agenda Federal judges, many appointed by Obama and Biden, continue blocking President Trump’s efforts to secure the border, halt chain migration, and stop the flow of public-charge immigrants. Just this week, a Biden-appointed judge in Manhattan struck down the State Department’s suspension of immigrant visas from 75 high-risk countries. The policy targeted nations with elevated rates of welfare use. The judge called it “patently unlawful” and ordered it vacated. This follows a pattern: A California judge issued a nationwide ban on ICE arrests at immigration courts. A Rhode Island judge forced the restart of asylum and benefits processing for nationals of 39 travel-ban countries. District courts across the country have repeatedly ordered the release of detainees, slowed deportations, and blocked enforcement tools the American people voted for. These are not narrow, case-specific rulings. They are broad injunctions that interfere with national immigration policy and affect applicants from Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, South Asia, and beyond. In practice, unelected judges are shaping U.S. visa and enforcement policy for the rest of the world. The pattern is clear. When the executive branch tries to put American citizens and taxpayers first, activist judges step in to protect the open-borders status quo preferred by the Left. America First should mean America First, not judicial vetoes that favor foreign nationals over the will of the voters.
- Sep 4, 2026
They said nobody is using your tax dollars for Sharia. Then they built the loans around it. Islam forbids riba, interest. So cities, states, and federal housing giants did not tell people to use the same loans everyone else uses. They rewrote the product so it would comply with Islamic law. Start in Minneapolis. In 2006 the City Council approved an Alternative Financing program. It launched in 2007. The city’s own site says it “conforms with Islamic law.” Ordinary city loans charge 2% interest. This version charges a 2% “rate of return” so the borrower does not pay interest. A private lender puts up half. The city matches the rest with public money, now up to $75,000. Since launch, Minneapolis has issued about $1.44 million through that program to 48 businesses. That is not a private bank being “inclusive.” That is taxpayer cash structured to Sharia. It is not only Minneapolis. Louisville rewrote its small-business lending so METCO could offer a “Sharia-compliant modification option.” Philadelphia’s housing plan called for developing a “Sharia-compliant Financing Product.” Seattle’s mayor’s office created an action item: “Housing Tools for Sharia-Compliant Lending.” Maine changed the rules so state-chartered credit unions can offer Sharia-compliant mortgages. Minnesota’s Department of Revenue even published tax instructions for “Shariah Compliant” home financing, cost-plus-profit instead of principal-plus-interest. Then look at the federal housing machine. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are government-sponsored enterprises. After 2008 they were bailed out and put in federal conservatorship. They buy mortgages so lenders can keep making more loans. That pipeline is backstopped by the U.S. government. In 1997–99 the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency said Islamic lease-to-own structures could be treated like regular home loans. In 2001 Freddie Mac started buying Islamic home-finance contracts. Fannie Mae followed. In 2006 University Bank signed a $100 million Sharia home-acquisition commitment with Freddie Mac. Fannie Mae has a loan code for “Musharaka Islamic Finance Mortgages.” Freddie Mac recognizes financing “designed to comply with Islamic law.” Guidance Residential, the largest U.S. Islamic home financier, has put more than $10 billion into 40,000-plus homes. It sells those co-ownership contracts into Freddie Mac. That is how a religious no-interest product scales in America: government-backed liquidity. They will tell you it is just “faith-friendly banking” and open to anyone. Fine. Then why did city halls and federal housing giants specially design the paperwork around riba? Christians, Jews, and everyone else pay interest on a normal loan or they don’t borrow. One group got cities and Fannie and Freddie to rebuild the product so Sharia is satisfied. If government will change lending for Sharia, it will change the next rule too. Your money. Their law. Our country still has one Constitution. One law. No parallel finance system paid for by the public.
- Sep 4, 2026
El-Sayed Is Courting Jewish Voters. Most of Them Still Don’t Trust Him. Abdul El-Sayed is trying to repair the damage with Jewish Democrats after a bitter primary. According to a new report, it is not working with the people he most needs. Michigan’s Democratic Senate nominee spent two days this week trying to mend fences. He apologized to the Michigan Jewish Democratic Caucus for remarks after the March attack on Temple Israel in West Bloomfield, when he talked about a “cycle” of violence and said “hurt people hurt people.” He is hiring a Jewish community liaison. He told one audience his commitment to Jewish safety matches the safety of his own daughters. For many Jewish Democrats, that is too little, too late. He has called Israel’s government “evil,” labeled the Gaza war a “genocide,” and wants to end U.S. aid to Israel, including Iron Dome. He has ducked a clean answer on whether Israel has a right to exist as a Jewish state. He campaigned with Hasan Piker. Zach Nessel of the Jewish Democratic Caucus said the apology “didn’t go far enough.” Mike Rogers is not waiting. He has been campaigning with Jewish leaders and circulating a list of hundreds of Michigan Jews, including Democrats, who say they will vote for him. More than 400 Jewish Michiganders signed a letter saying they feel threatened and alienated by El-Sayed and his allies. Some lifelong Democrats in Oak Park, West Bloomfield, Huntington Woods, and Southfield are openly crossing over. The numbers are small and the stakes are not. Michigan has roughly 100,000 to 130,000 Jewish residents, concentrated in the Detroit suburbs. Rogers lost to Elissa Slotkin by about 19,000 votes. A few thousand defectors can move a Senate seat that helps decide control of the chamber. El-Sayed can hold all the listening sessions he wants. He does not get to call Israel evil, platform Piker, soft-pedal a synagogue attack, and then act shocked that Jewish voters will not rubber-stamp him because he is the Democrat. Party loyalty is not a suicide pact. In a race this close, that refusal may be the whole ballgame.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 187 interactions against 82K followers, an engagement rate of 0.23%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 66x its own typical post.
- What is Molly Pitcher's engagement rate on X?
- Molly Pitcher (@AmericanMama) has an engagement rate of 0.23%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 81,535 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.23%, Molly Pitcher sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @AmericanMama have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @AmericanMama post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.6 posts per day across the measured window.