Back to @AleoHQ's profile

Aleo engagement report

@AleoHQ - 278K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.034%
of 278K followers
Per impression
0.887%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
3.85%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
95
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.97/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 95 interactions against 278K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.887% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 89% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Aleo's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.034%, Aleo sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video89% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link89% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 89% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 573 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 15, 202612x their median

    From private spending to real-time streaming on @AleoHQ. Aleo-native streaming is now live through the Zebec SuperApp, bringing USDCx & USAD payment streams to Aleo’s privacy-first infrastructure. Start streaming: https://t.co/olqrMHP1Gj https://t.co/HEdAOCyAgT

    904181552871K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20265.5x their median

    Don’t be a target. https://t.co/LxFBBeW30N

    33188931191K viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 20263.1x their median

    The case for private stablecoins has never been stronger. Today, we're thrilled to release a landmark white paper that explains how privacy is the missing layer that makes blockchain payment rails viable for mainstream institutional use. The GENIUS Act presents the opportunity for widespread stablecoin adoption. But public blockchains expose every transaction, permanently, hindering adoption. Payroll. Treasury. Vendor payments. All of it broadcast to the world. Existing solutions fall short and carry too much risk for institutions to engage. The industry has been stuck. But today that changes. This paper presents a new path forward: permissionless, private stablecoin architecture built on Aleo, using zero-knowledge technology and programmable smart contracts. Financial privacy and institutional risk management are not in tension. They're built from the same foundation, with programmable risk mitigation that lets institutions transact privately without compromise. Behind this paper is a team that has spent careers at the intersection of cryptography, policy, and financial systems. Aleo's Global Head of Policy @SignCurve, Valerie-Leila Jaber of the @crypto_council for Innovation and former Global Head of Financial Crime Compliance at Coinbase, and @matthew_d_green, cryptographer and Johns Hopkins University computer science professor, bring a rare combination of hands-on experience in private payments, financial regulation, and zero-knowledge cryptography. This is a big deal. Not just for Aleo, but for institutional finance as a whole. Read More 👇 https://t.co/ngx5fgN5yy

    19937421358K viewsView on X
  • May 13, 20264.3x their median

    Aleo is the first blockchain to support shielded transactions on @Ledger 🛡️ For years, this gap has been an open problem. Hardware wallets were originally built for transparent chains, not private execution. Shielded transactions require generating zero-knowledge proofs over private state, a fundamentally different signing flow. After working closely with Ledger to adapt their architecture this feature is now live. Available across 7M+ devices. Until now, hardware wallets secured keys, but not privacy. This created new risks for large holders by exposing balances and activity. That tradeoff is gone. "At Ledger, our foundation is built on uncompromising security. This partnership with Aleo represents a pivotal moment, merging our hardware-based security with their zero-knowledge cryptography." — @P3b7_, CTO, Ledger Learn more 👇 https://t.co/6xmeZ5u57W

    19028252160K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.2x their median

    Arc 🤝 Aleo Today @arc went live & we're excited that USDCx on Aleo supports xReserve on Arc deposits from day one. What this unlocks: 👉 Deposit @USDC on Arc to mint USDCx on Aleo, with faster finality and lower costs. Ethereum remains fully supported 👉 CCTP allows users on other native USDC chains to move into private USDCx on Aleo 👉 Move balances between ecosystems to take advantage of Arc’s live markets for lending, borrowing, trading, onchain FX, payments, and tokenized assets 📖 Read more: https://t.co/H7cXD6nZTB 🌐 Explore Arc: https://t.co/QCbHh6LEQk 🦁 Shield your balance on Aleo: https://t.co/C1FHtZ04Ju

    1641421828K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20263.0x their median

    🔥 INSIGHT: Every payment and identity check leaves a digital footprint. What if you could prove who you are without exposing all your personal data? @AleoHQ uses zero-knowledge technology to enable private payments and identity verification while revealing only what’s necessary. Could privacy-by-design become the future of Web3?

    1192051575K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20261.8x their median

    Private USDCx is now live on @krakenfx 🎉 The first private, programmable stablecoin, available to millions of users 🌎 No bridges or complex steps. Just purchase it on Kraken and send it to your Aleo address, ready to use. Available today! Learn More 👇 https://t.co/OdM3porVkO

    12618181337K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20261.8x their median

    USDCx on Aleo is now live in the Ledger Wallet™ app 🎉 @Ledger and Aleo come together to bring private stablecoins to a mainstream hardware wallet for the first time. USDCx on Aleo is a dollar-denominated stablecoin built on Aleo. For years, holding meaningful value onchain has meant a tradeoff between security and privacy. Blockchain analytics, exchange records, and behavioral patterns make it increasingly straightforward to connect an address to the person behind it 🔎 Once that link is made, every balance and transaction attached to it is permanent. Moving to a centralized exchange solved public visibility by trading away ownership. Self-custody removes that custodial risk, but if your address is public, your balance and transaction history stay visible to anyone who finds it. Until today, it hasn't been possible to achieve both hardware cold storage and privacy. Now, every transaction is confirmed and signed on your Ledger device's secure screen, while amounts, sender, and receiver stay private. Your keys stay offline, and your balance stops being public information. Learn more 👇 https://t.co/YVHE1Rs7EZ

    1172621911K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    Kicking off the Wyoming Blockchain Symposium off in style! https://t.co/s9cQOx5h5d

    123115258K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 2026

    Built On Aleo 🛠️ USDCx on Aleo, a first private, programmable stablecoin ✨ Private transactions for real-world finance. USDCx on Aleo is a privacy-first stablecoin backed 1:1 by @USDC in @circle xReserve. It makes private programmable money accessible to mainstream users, opening it up to use cases like payroll, settlements, vendor payments, and more. Most stablecoins today run on public blockchains where every balance, payment, and transaction is visible to anyone. That level of transparency is a big concern for real businesses. Companies can’t expose payroll data. Vendors shouldn’t reveal customer payment details. Treasuries can’t broadcast all their financial activity. Real finance requires confidentiality. That’s where USDCx on Aleo comes in. By combining Aleo’s private-by-default architecture with the Circle xReserve infrastructure, USDCx on Aleo enables private stablecoin payments while remaining fully backed by USDC and interoperable across supported chains. The result is a stablecoin built for mainstream adoption. Companies can efficiently pay a global workforce without exposing compensation structures. Aid organizations can distribute funds without revealing identities. Businesses can transact onchain without leaking sensitive financial data. Private when it needs to be. Programmable when it matters. By integrating Aleo, stablecoins are transformed from transparent payment rails into infrastructure that can support real-world financial systems. USDCx on Aleo is available for use today. Learn more about it in our full article👇 https://t.co/VuKa32RQMn

    7814131012K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 95 interactions against 278K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.887% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 89% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is Aleo's engagement rate on X?
Aleo (@AleoHQ) has an engagement rate of 0.034%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 278,029 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.034%, Aleo sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AleoHQ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AleoHQ post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going