Back to @robmaurer's profile

Rob Maurer engagement report

@robmaurer - 371K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.093%
of 371K followers
Per impression
1.68%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
5.53%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
344
interactions (median)
Saved
0.127%
26 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.03/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 344 interactions against 371K followers, an engagement rate of 0.093%. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 1.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 44x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.093%, Rob Maurer sits above the 50th percentile of the 41,681 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.083% to 0.447%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.083%
p750.447%
p902.07%
p99143.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 41,681 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 89,603 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.083%
75th percentile0.447%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile143.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%58K
01:00 UTC-2%59K
02:00 UTC-3%58K
03:00 UTC-4%62K
04:00 UTC-6%50K
05:00 UTC-5%48K
06:00 UTC-5%56K
07:00 UTC-4%60K
08:00 UTC-4%70K
09:00 UTC-4%81K
10:00 UTC-3%83K
11:00 UTC-3%91K
12:00 UTC-2%100K
13:00 UTC-2%109K
14:00 UTC-3%112K
15:00 UTC-2%116K
16:00 UTC-4%113K
17:00 UTC-3%105K
18:00 UTC-2%98K
19:00 UTC-2%92K
20:00 UTC-1%86K
21:00 UTC-1%76K
22:00 UTC-2%66K
23:00 UTC-1%59K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%255K
Monday+1%328K
Tuesday-2%353K
Wednesday-4%317K
Thursday-2%269K
Friday-3%276K
Saturday+3%249K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Nov 25, 202444x their median

    We’re excited to announce the approval and launch of a new feasibility trial to extend BCI control using the N1 Implant to an investigational assistive robotic arm. This is an important first step towards restoring not only digital freedom, but also physical freedom. More info to come, but the CONVOY Study will enable cross-enrolling participants from the ongoing PRIME Study. To read more about the PRIME Study: https://t.co/EiR3A6nziH

    12K1.7K9583942.3M viewsView on X
  • May 6, 202627x their median

    TBC is excited to announce the first residential Music City Loop station agreement, serving those living at the beautiful Prime, Alcove, and Paramount towers in downtown Nashville. Residents will take an elevator directly to a Loop station within the building, board a Tesla, and be at the airport in ~9 minutes or Lower Broadway in ~2 minutes.

    7.4K1.3K4911271.4M viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 202526x their median

    Here’s my entire first Tesla Robotaxi trip from start to finish. Ten miles across south Austin. Timestamps in comments. https://t.co/cr6y4z1UWB

    7.2K1.1K5031483.7M viewsView on X
  • Jun 5, 202624x their median

    SpaceX just quietly amended its S-1 announcing another mega deal $920M/month from Google from October 2026 through June 2029 With both parties being able to terminate the agreement with 90 days notice Things are getting exciting 🚀 https://t.co/vnEFaWrlXm

    6.6K1.1K4861933.0M viewsView on X
  • Nov 6, 202424x their median

    One of the biggest fumbles of all time 👇 https://t.co/VOKgQi22ap

    7.5K40516040346K viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 202521x their median

    Here’s a quick overview of the Tesla Robotaxi app! https://t.co/AAtPZS1E5T

    6.1K841233471.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 202518x their median

    Grok 4 (Thinking) achieves new SOTA on ARC-AGI-2 with 15.9% This nearly doubles the previous commercial SOTA and tops the current Kaggle competition SOTA https://t.co/YbCMLXPJ2e

    4.9K6772302957.3M viewsView on X
  • Dec 11, 202417x their median

    Tesla stock has hit a new all time high! ✅ It's been a wild three years. TSLA was as low as $101 less than two years ago, 75% below peak. Congratulations to those who have been able to stay the course and keep a steady mind along the way. Respect. Thank you @tesla & @elonmusk

    5.2K35937524120K viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 202515x their median

    After multiple Tesla Robotaxi and Waymo rides in Austin, I have to say Tesla is quite a bit smoother.

    4.7K2627427347K viewsView on X
  • Jun 8, 202414x their median

    I have voted FOR the ratification of Elon Musk’s compensation plan. I just reviewed my thoughts from Tesla Daily in January '18 when it was announced: “To sum it up, I think for existing shareholders this proposal is extremely beneficial, extremely friendly to stockholders.” Buying In: “I think instances like this where Musk is able to fully buy into the company and fully predicate his returns on this amazing growth for Tesla — where if that doesn’t happen he gets literally nothing — just goes to show how invested he is.” Message For Short Sellers: "When shorts kind of question [Musk's long-term vision], or say that he’s just hyping up the stock for some temporary gains or things like that, stuff like this just immediately proves those sort of arguments to be complete false.” Amazing Growth “I believe that if the $650B market cap were to be achieved, for example by 2023, that Elon should definitely be rewarded for that kind of amazing growth. I mean, that would be the market cap increasing by 11x in less than what, six years? Which would be crazy, and certainly worthy of the payment that Elon would receive.” Market Didn't Believe It: “I remain extremely positive on this plan, I was actually surprised the stock was not up further yesterday on this news.” Plan Helped Tesla Recruit Talent: “I think maybe an under-appreciated aspect of Tesla is their ability to use equity to attract talent. So when prospective talent is kind of weighing their options and deciding potentially between Tesla and another competitor, the opportunity that exists within Tesla's equity is probably much greater than an alternative. The fact that Musk's compensation plan is tied to these aggressive market cap goals is a strong signal for anyone looking at [equity compensation] and trying to evaluate what their compensation could eventually equate to when including that equity. That should be a pretty big advantage, certainly against companies like Ford and GM, but even against companies like Google and Facebook, where there's maybe less upside in terms of the market cap and therefore possibly less upside in the equity stake that an employee might expect to earn. The fact that the CEO's compensation plan directly spells out a path to 11x in terms of the market cap is pretty significant when evaluating those options, I think. For a company like Facebook or Google to grow to that level, they would have to be $6-8 trillion in market cap, and there is no single company right now that's even above $1 trillion, so to expect that kind of growth from those other companies would be pretty unrealistic. I also think that this provides a similar benefit to investors in terms of spelling out that clear path and those clear growth targets, because part of the bear narrative of Tesla is that it's overpriced and that even if Tesla achieves their wildest dreams, that the market cap should still only be like $60 billion or something, which in my opinion is a pretty ridiculous argument, but with this compensation clearly spelled out like this, it shows that Tesla themselves believe that the market cap is not overpriced and that it does still have tremendous growth potential at these levels. I think that will encourage more people to invest, and I also believe that it will encourage stability as Tesla continues to grow, hopefully to those levels of market cap.” Back To Today I have always believed this plan was excellent for shareholders. I was right — the shares I owned when recording these thoughts are up 800% compared to the S&P 500 up 80%. This compensation plan was fundamental to that outperformance in many ways, from securing Musk's leadership, to talent acquisition / retention, to investor confidence, and more. If Tesla would have underperformed, @elonmusk would have received nothing. What Tesla has accomplished is unparalleled. For anyone to look back in hindsight and diminish how extremely difficult these milestones were to achieve is outrageous. I think the primary reason some shareholders are questioning this vote is due to the share price performance over the last couple years, and I believe that is extremely short-sighted, on top of being irrelevant to this issue. I held shares from 2013 that were in the red in 2019, six years later. People were also frustrated then, but it would have been wrong to use that as justification to retract Elon's (very similarly structured) 2012 compensation plan. Fortunately, I let my analysis and my ethics determine my actions, rather than being influenced by market sentiment, and it paid off. I hope other shareholders won't be prisoners of the moment in 2024.

    4.1K54022161333K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 344 interactions against 371K followers, an engagement rate of 0.093%. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 1.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 44x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Rob Maurer's engagement rate on X?
Rob Maurer (@robmaurer) has an engagement rate of 0.093%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 370,699 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.093%, Rob Maurer sits above the 50th percentile of the 41,681 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @robmaurer have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @robmaurer post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going